A structural equation model analysis of the association between work-related stress, burnout and job-related affective well-being among nurses in Saudi Arabia during the COVID-19 pandemic.
burnout
compassion fatigue
job-related affective well-being
secondary traumatic stress
work-related stress
Journal
Journal of nursing management
ISSN: 1365-2834
Titre abrégé: J Nurs Manag
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9306050
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2022
May 2022
Historique:
revised:
06
03
2022
received:
24
11
2021
accepted:
08
03
2022
pubmed:
13
3
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
entrez:
12
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To test a model that examines the direct and indirect effects of work-related stress on job-related affective well-being through compassion fatigue. Despite the danger of infection, nurses' dedication to their work appears to be an innate desire to provide care for patients with COVID-19. Nonetheless, the universal effort to control the outbreak has led to extended work hours and workload, which has been defined as the primary contributor to work-related stress among nurses and might impact their job-related affective well-being. We used a cross-sectional exploratory design. Data were collected using an online survey from 161 nurses working in the Saudi health care system. The survey included obtaining information on demographics and work-related stress using Professional Quality of Life Scale version 5 to measure compassion fatigue as well as a job-related affective well-being scale. Work-related stress had significant negative direct effects on job-related affective well-being and positive effects on compassion fatigue. Compassion fatigue had significantly negative direct effects on job-related affective well-being. Work-related stress exerted negative indirect effects on job-related affective well-being through compassion fatigue, which partially mediated the relationship. The findings supported the model and added to our understanding regarding the impact of work-related stress on nurses. Stress reduction is an important element in improving staff outcomes as well as job-related affective well-being.
Sections du résumé
AIM
OBJECTIVE
To test a model that examines the direct and indirect effects of work-related stress on job-related affective well-being through compassion fatigue.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Despite the danger of infection, nurses' dedication to their work appears to be an innate desire to provide care for patients with COVID-19. Nonetheless, the universal effort to control the outbreak has led to extended work hours and workload, which has been defined as the primary contributor to work-related stress among nurses and might impact their job-related affective well-being.
METHOD
METHODS
We used a cross-sectional exploratory design. Data were collected using an online survey from 161 nurses working in the Saudi health care system. The survey included obtaining information on demographics and work-related stress using Professional Quality of Life Scale version 5 to measure compassion fatigue as well as a job-related affective well-being scale.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Work-related stress had significant negative direct effects on job-related affective well-being and positive effects on compassion fatigue. Compassion fatigue had significantly negative direct effects on job-related affective well-being. Work-related stress exerted negative indirect effects on job-related affective well-being through compassion fatigue, which partially mediated the relationship.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The findings supported the model and added to our understanding regarding the impact of work-related stress on nurses.
IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT
CONCLUSIONS
Stress reduction is an important element in improving staff outcomes as well as job-related affective well-being.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35277901
doi: 10.1111/jonm.13587
pmc: PMC9115163
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
892-900Subventions
Organisme : Research Centre of the Female Scientific and Medical Colleges
Informations de copyright
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
J Nurs Manag. 2022 May;30(4):892-900
pubmed: 35277901
Int J Nurs Stud. 2016 Aug;60:1-11
pubmed: 27297364
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2020 Mar 20;38(3):192-195
pubmed: 32131151
Saudi Med J. 2021 Mar;42(3):306-314
pubmed: 33632910
Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Feb;102:103472
pubmed: 31810017
HeilberufeScience. 2021;12(3-4):92-98
pubmed: 34522573
Work. 2019;62(1):87-95
pubmed: 30741714
Behav Med. 1991 Fall;17(3):111-20
pubmed: 1932844
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2021 Aug;94(6):1345-1352
pubmed: 33864490
Res Nurs Health. 2010 Apr;33(2):133-43
pubmed: 20069612
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 26;382(13):1199-1207
pubmed: 31995857
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Feb 26;15(3):
pubmed: 29495360
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2021 Aug;67(5):522-531
pubmed: 32972298
Eur J Psychol. 2019 Jun 07;15(2):342-357
pubmed: 33574959
Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Oct;24(5):e12676
pubmed: 30003631
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2021 Aug;59(8):31-42
pubmed: 34110949
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jan;82:102945
pubmed: 31491722
BMC Public Health. 2020 Dec 7;20(1):1885
pubmed: 33287794
J Adv Nurs. 2020 Jul;76(7):1486-1487
pubmed: 32202336
Am J Nurs. 2013 Dec;113(12):24-31; quiz 32
pubmed: 24247662