Plasma Tie2 trajectories identify vascular response criteria for VEGF inhibitors across advanced biliary tract, colorectal and ovarian cancers.
Tie2
VEGF inhibitor
angiogenesis
bile duct cancer
response biomarker
Journal
ESMO open
ISSN: 2059-7029
Titre abrégé: ESMO Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101690685
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
received:
15
11
2021
revised:
10
01
2022
accepted:
19
01
2022
pubmed:
14
3
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
entrez:
13
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi) are compromised by a lack of validated biomarkers. Previously we showed that changes in the concentration of plasma Tie2 (pTie2) was a response biomarker for bevacizumab. Here, we investigated whether pTie2 can predict response and progression cross-tumour for generic VEGFi treatment. Patients (n = 124) with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC) received cisplatin/gemcitabine with cediranib or placebo (ABC-03 trial). Concentrations of pTie2 were measured longitudinally from before treatment until disease progression. Data from patients with ovarian cancer (n = 92, ICON7 trial) and patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) (n = 70, Travastin trial) were also included. Cediranib-treated ABC patients were deconvoluted into distinct groups where in one group pTie2 trajectories resembled those seen in placebo-treated patients and in another pTie2 significantly reduced (t-test P = 2.7 × 10 pTie2 is the first cross-tumour, generic VEGFi, vascular response biomarker to guide optimum use of VEGFi in clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors (VEGFi) are compromised by a lack of validated biomarkers. Previously we showed that changes in the concentration of plasma Tie2 (pTie2) was a response biomarker for bevacizumab. Here, we investigated whether pTie2 can predict response and progression cross-tumour for generic VEGFi treatment.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients (n = 124) with advanced biliary tract cancer (ABC) received cisplatin/gemcitabine with cediranib or placebo (ABC-03 trial). Concentrations of pTie2 were measured longitudinally from before treatment until disease progression. Data from patients with ovarian cancer (n = 92, ICON7 trial) and patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) (n = 70, Travastin trial) were also included.
RESULTS
Cediranib-treated ABC patients were deconvoluted into distinct groups where in one group pTie2 trajectories resembled those seen in placebo-treated patients and in another pTie2 significantly reduced (t-test P = 2.7 × 10
CONCLUSION
pTie2 is the first cross-tumour, generic VEGFi, vascular response biomarker to guide optimum use of VEGFi in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35279528
pii: S2059-7029(22)00038-2
doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100417
pmc: PMC9058891
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
100417Subventions
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C2930/A11428
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C480/A15578
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C5759/A27412
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Disclosure JWV reports personal fees from Agios, AstraZeneca, Baxter, Genoscience Pharma, Hutchison Medipharma, Imaging Equipment Ltd (AAA), Incyte, Ipsen, Mundipharma EDO, Mylan, QED, Servier, Sirtex and Zymerworks; and grants, personal fees and non-financial support from NuCana, outside the submitted work. GCJ reports research funding from AstraZeneca for clinical trials outside of the submitted work. Research funding has been received from: AstraZeneca, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Bioven, Amgen, Carrick Therapeutics, Merck AG, Taiho Oncology, GSK, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, BMS, Novartis, Celgene, Epigene Therapeutics Inc, Angle PLC, Menarini, Clearbridge Biomedics, Thermo Fisher Scientific and Neomed Therapeutics. CD has received honoraria for consultancy/advisory boards from Biocartis, Merck and AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Références
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 10;24(5):769-77
pubmed: 16391297
Cancer Cell. 2011 Apr 12;19(4):512-26
pubmed: 21481792
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):267-276
pubmed: 33539744
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):967-78
pubmed: 26179201
N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 19;381(25):2416-2428
pubmed: 31851799
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1894-1905
pubmed: 32402160
Br J Cancer. 2016 Jul 12;115(2):228-35
pubmed: 27351218
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Oct;20(10):1409-1419
pubmed: 31474354
Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jan;14(1):29-37
pubmed: 23168366
Eur J Cancer. 2005 Aug;41(12):1690-6
pubmed: 16043346
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 24;8(57):96496-96505
pubmed: 29228548
Lancet. 2016 Jul 30;388(10043):518-29
pubmed: 26853587
Br J Cancer. 2018 Jul;119(1):27-35
pubmed: 29925934
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 15;23(22):7034-7046
pubmed: 28855350
Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):711-718
pubmed: 30922731
J Immunol Methods. 2009 Mar 15;342(1-2):106-14
pubmed: 19174166
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 7;9(1):4672
pubmed: 30405103