Neural Correlates of Attachment Representation in Patients With Borderline Personality Disorder Using a Personalized Functional Magnet Resonance Imaging Task.
adult attachment representation
aloneness
anterior medial cingulate cortex
fear of abandonment
hypermentalization
neural correlates of attachment representation borderline personality disorder
social pain
Journal
Frontiers in human neuroscience
ISSN: 1662-5161
Titre abrégé: Front Hum Neurosci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101477954
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
06
11
2021
accepted:
07
02
2022
entrez:
14
3
2022
pubmed:
15
3
2022
medline:
15
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fear of abandonment and aloneness play a key role in the clinical understanding interpersonal and attachment-specific problems in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and has been investigated in previous functional Magnet Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies. The aim of the present study was to examine how different aspects of attachment representations are processed in BPD, by using for the first time an fMRI attachment paradigm including personalized core sentences from the participants' own attachment stories. We hypothesized that BPD patients would show increased functional involvement of limbic brain regions associated with fear and pain (e.g., the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex) when presented personalized attachment relevant stimuli representing loneliness compared to healthy controls (HC). We examined the attachment classifications of 26 female BPD patients and 26 female HC using the Adult Attachment Projective Picture System (AAP). We used an fMRI-adapted attachment paradigm to investigate the neural correlates of attachment. All participants were presented three personalized (vs. neutral) sentences extracted from their AAP attachment narrative, combined with standardized AAP pictures representing being alone (monadic) or in interactive (dyadic) attachment situations. As expected, the classification of unresolved attachment was significantly greater in BPD compared to HC. BPD patients showed increased fMRI-activation in brain areas associated with fear, pain, and hyperarousal than HC when presented with personalized attachment-relevant alone stimuli. In particular, pictures with monadic attachment situations induced greater anterior medial cingulate cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, thalamus and superior temporal gyrus activation in the patient group. The results point to increased fMRI-activation in areas processing emotional distress and painful experiences in BPD patients. In particular, the emotional cascade reflecting attachment distress was evoked by combining monadic pictures, representing abandonment and aloneness, with the patients' personalized narrative material. Our results confirmed and replicated previous results that illustrate once again the high relevance of aloneness and feelings of abandonment for BPD in the context of attachment trauma. Moreover, our results support the hypothesis of hypermentalization in response to attachment distress as a core feature of social-cognitive impairment in BPD associated with common treatment implications across different therapeutic orientations.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Fear of abandonment and aloneness play a key role in the clinical understanding interpersonal and attachment-specific problems in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and has been investigated in previous functional Magnet Resonance Imaging (fMRI) studies. The aim of the present study was to examine how different aspects of attachment representations are processed in BPD, by using for the first time an fMRI attachment paradigm including personalized core sentences from the participants' own attachment stories. We hypothesized that BPD patients would show increased functional involvement of limbic brain regions associated with fear and pain (e.g., the amygdala and the anterior cingulate cortex) when presented personalized attachment relevant stimuli representing loneliness compared to healthy controls (HC).
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We examined the attachment classifications of 26 female BPD patients and 26 female HC using the Adult Attachment Projective Picture System (AAP). We used an fMRI-adapted attachment paradigm to investigate the neural correlates of attachment. All participants were presented three personalized (vs. neutral) sentences extracted from their AAP attachment narrative, combined with standardized AAP pictures representing being alone (monadic) or in interactive (dyadic) attachment situations.
Results
UNASSIGNED
As expected, the classification of unresolved attachment was significantly greater in BPD compared to HC. BPD patients showed increased fMRI-activation in brain areas associated with fear, pain, and hyperarousal than HC when presented with personalized attachment-relevant alone stimuli. In particular, pictures with monadic attachment situations induced greater anterior medial cingulate cortex, anterior insula, amygdala, thalamus and superior temporal gyrus activation in the patient group.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The results point to increased fMRI-activation in areas processing emotional distress and painful experiences in BPD patients. In particular, the emotional cascade reflecting attachment distress was evoked by combining monadic pictures, representing abandonment and aloneness, with the patients' personalized narrative material. Our results confirmed and replicated previous results that illustrate once again the high relevance of aloneness and feelings of abandonment for BPD in the context of attachment trauma. Moreover, our results support the hypothesis of hypermentalization in response to attachment distress as a core feature of social-cognitive impairment in BPD associated with common treatment implications across different therapeutic orientations.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35280201
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.810417
pmc: PMC8908102
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
810417Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Bernheim, Buchheim, Domin, Mentel and Lotze.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014 Nov;9(11):1789-97
pubmed: 24273076
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2018 Dec;41(4):651-668
pubmed: 30447730
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 15;10(1):9658
pubmed: 32541672
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Jul;6(7):533-44
pubmed: 15995724
Lancet. 2011 Jan 1;377(9759):74-84
pubmed: 21195251
Neuroimage. 2005 May 1;25(4):1325-35
pubmed: 15850749
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011 Spring;23(2):121-5
pubmed: 21677237
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2001 May;51(5):201-11
pubmed: 11417358
Pain Med. 2015 Nov;16(11):2121-33
pubmed: 25989475
Psychother Psychosom. 2013;82(4):221-33
pubmed: 23712109
Am J Psychiatry. 1996 Jun;153(6):752-8
pubmed: 8633685
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Jul 05;10:345
pubmed: 27458363
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Feb;64(1):22-31
pubmed: 8907081
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Aug 02;10:389
pubmed: 27531977
Psychopathology. 2006;39(3):144-52
pubmed: 16531690
Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2017;4(1):21-30
pubmed: 28331780
Neuroimage. 2002 Jan;15(1):273-89
pubmed: 11771995
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):459-73
pubmed: 12689373
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2019 Apr 10;6:5
pubmed: 31007932
Attach Hum Dev. 2001 Apr;3(1):30-61
pubmed: 11708383
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(4):252-254
pubmed: 29768272
J Abnorm Psychol. 2015 May;124(2):387-98
pubmed: 25730515
Psychiatry Res. 2008 Aug 30;163(3):223-35
pubmed: 18635342
Science. 2003 Oct 10;302(5643):290-2
pubmed: 14551436
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2014 Sep 09;1:12
pubmed: 26401296
Attach Hum Dev. 2009 May;11(3):223-63
pubmed: 19455453
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Sep;30(9):2731-45
pubmed: 19072897
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 24;11:196
pubmed: 28484382
Neuroimage. 2005 Dec;28(4):835-47
pubmed: 16087352
Neuroimage. 2017 Jun;153:359-368
pubmed: 28235565
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Feb 19;9:79
pubmed: 25745393
J Pers Disord. 2009 Feb;23(1):6-19
pubmed: 19267658
Cereb Cortex. 2015 Aug;25(8):2065-75
pubmed: 24518753
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Dec;48(12):1060-4
pubmed: 1845222
Eur J Pain. 2005 Aug;9(4):463-84
pubmed: 15979027
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):470-8
pubmed: 17071110
Am J Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 1;173(7):688-94
pubmed: 26869248
Neuroimage. 2011 Feb 1;54(3):2492-502
pubmed: 20946964
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2012 Feb;7(2):184-92
pubmed: 21467049
Hum Brain Mapp. 2004 Dec;23(4):200-9
pubmed: 15449355
Dev Psychopathol. 2005 Fall;17(4):959-86
pubmed: 16613426
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2017 Nov 24;4:23
pubmed: 29204276
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2000 Mar;23(1):89-101
pubmed: 10729933
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Mar 24;11:136
pubmed: 28392762
Psychother Psychosom. 2017;86(5):314-316
pubmed: 28903103
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2004 Mar-Apr;12(2):94-104
pubmed: 15204804
Am J Psychiatry. 2015 Sep 1;172(9):840-51
pubmed: 26324303
Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Jul 15;54(2):142-51
pubmed: 12873804
World J Biol Psychiatry. 2013 May;14(4):307-18, S1-4
pubmed: 22404662
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2019 May;26(3):339-349
pubmed: 30667573
Psychiatry Res. 2007 Aug 15;155(3):231-43
pubmed: 17601709
Psychol Med. 2015 Nov;45(15):3171-80
pubmed: 26087850
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33745
pubmed: 22470470
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2014 Oct 28;1:15
pubmed: 26401299
Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Dec 1;54(11):1284-93
pubmed: 14643096
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2017 Apr 11;4:11
pubmed: 28413687