Feasibility of a prototype carbon nanotube enabled stationary digital chest tomosynthesis system for identification of pulmonary nodules by pulmonologists.
Tomosynthesis
bronchoscopy
chest imaging
lung cancer
pulmonary nodules
Journal
Journal of thoracic disease
ISSN: 2072-1439
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Dis
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101533916
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
22
08
2021
accepted:
30
12
2021
entrez:
14
3
2022
pubmed:
15
3
2022
medline:
15
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Screen detected and incidental pulmonary nodules are increasingly common. Current guidelines recommend tissue sampling of solid nodules >8 mm. Bronchoscopic biopsy poses the lowest risk but is paired with the lowest diagnostic yield when compared to CT-guided biopsy or surgery. A need exists for a safe, mobile, low radiation dose, intra-procedural method to localize biopsy instruments within target nodules. This retrospective cross sectional reader feasibility study evaluates the ability of clinicians to identify pulmonary nodules using a prototype carbon nanotube radiation enabled stationary digital chest tomosynthesis system. Patients with pulmonary nodules on prior CT imaging were recruited and consented for imaging with stationary digital chest tomosynthesis. Five pulmonologists of varying training levels participated as readers. Following review of patient CT and a thoracic radiologist's interpretation of nodule size and location the readers were tasked with interpreting the corresponding tomosynthesis scan to identify the same nodule found on CT. Fifty-five patients were scanned with stationary digital chest tomosynthesis. The median nodule size was 6 mm (IQR =4-13 mm). Twenty nodules (37%) were greater than 8 mm. The radiation entrance dose for s-DCT was 0.6 mGy. A significant difference in identification of nodules using s-DCT was seen for nodules <8 With system and carbon nanotube array optimization, we hypothesize the detection rate for nodules will improve. Additional study is needed to evaluate its use in target and tool co-localization and target biopsy.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Screen detected and incidental pulmonary nodules are increasingly common. Current guidelines recommend tissue sampling of solid nodules >8 mm. Bronchoscopic biopsy poses the lowest risk but is paired with the lowest diagnostic yield when compared to CT-guided biopsy or surgery. A need exists for a safe, mobile, low radiation dose, intra-procedural method to localize biopsy instruments within target nodules. This retrospective cross sectional reader feasibility study evaluates the ability of clinicians to identify pulmonary nodules using a prototype carbon nanotube radiation enabled stationary digital chest tomosynthesis system.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
Patients with pulmonary nodules on prior CT imaging were recruited and consented for imaging with stationary digital chest tomosynthesis. Five pulmonologists of varying training levels participated as readers. Following review of patient CT and a thoracic radiologist's interpretation of nodule size and location the readers were tasked with interpreting the corresponding tomosynthesis scan to identify the same nodule found on CT.
Results
UNASSIGNED
Fifty-five patients were scanned with stationary digital chest tomosynthesis. The median nodule size was 6 mm (IQR =4-13 mm). Twenty nodules (37%) were greater than 8 mm. The radiation entrance dose for s-DCT was 0.6 mGy. A significant difference in identification of nodules using s-DCT was seen for nodules <8
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
With system and carbon nanotube array optimization, we hypothesize the detection rate for nodules will improve. Additional study is needed to evaluate its use in target and tool co-localization and target biopsy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35280479
doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-1381
pii: jtd-14-02-257
pmc: PMC8902128
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
257-268Informations de copyright
2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://jtd.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/jtd-21-1381/coif) and report that the current study was partially funded by the institutional University Cancer Research Fund via a Lineberger Comprehensive Clinical Cancer Center award. CI reports that she is co-inventor of the tomosynthesis system and received royalties from UNC for the intellectual property (IP). OZ, JL, CI and YL are co-inventors of the stationary chest tomosynthesis imaging system evaluated in this study. OZ and JL are co-owners of Xintek, Inc., the company to which the technology has been licensed. OZ and JL report that they are shareholders and consultants for the company that the IP is licensed to. YL reports that he is co-inventor of the system, but does not receive financial or other interests from the IP. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.
Références
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 4;365(5):395-409
pubmed: 21714641
Med Phys. 2011 Aug;38(8):4563-74
pubmed: 21928628
Acad Radiol. 2014 Nov;21(11):1427-33
pubmed: 25097012
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2002 Oct;23(5):402-10
pubmed: 12509110
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2010 Apr-May;139(1-3):153-8
pubmed: 20233755
Chest. 1993 Oct;104(4):1021-4
pubmed: 8404158
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jan 1;193(1):68-77
pubmed: 26367186
Chest. 2015 May;147(5):1275-1281
pubmed: 25357229
J Thorac Dis. 2015 May;7(5):799-809
pubmed: 26101635
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol. 2018 Oct;25(4):274-282
pubmed: 30179922
Med Phys. 2021 Mar;48(3):1089-1099
pubmed: 33382470
Korean J Radiol. 2013 May-Jun;14(3):525-31
pubmed: 23690724
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Oct 7;48(19):R65-106
pubmed: 14579853
Chest. 2013 May;143(5 Suppl):e93S-e120S
pubmed: 23649456
Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Feb;35(1):17-26
pubmed: 24481756
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1595-1611
pubmed: 32395297
Laryngoscope. 2009 Mar;119(3):434-41
pubmed: 19235745
Eur Radiol. 2020 Oct;30(10):5437-5445
pubmed: 32382844
Eur Respir J. 2011 Apr;37(4):902-10
pubmed: 20693253
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 5;369(10):910-9
pubmed: 24004118
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2010;7622:76220H
pubmed: 27053823
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):477-484
pubmed: 31309308
Med Phys. 2016 Dec;43(12):6282
pubmed: 27908166
Radiographics. 2012 Sep-Oct;32(5):E201-32
pubmed: 22977038
Chest. 2012 Aug;142(2):385-393
pubmed: 21980059
Head Neck. 2010 Apr;32(4):504-12
pubmed: 19693942
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):433-40
pubmed: 17242253
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011 Dec;27(8):1205-22
pubmed: 21394614
N Engl J Med. 2011 Nov 24;365(21):2036; author reply 2037-8
pubmed: 22111730
Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):244-51
pubmed: 19616909
Clin Radiol. 2008 Mar;63(3):272-7
pubmed: 18275867
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):228-243
pubmed: 28240562
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Feb 24;7(5):202-7
pubmed: 26156930
Med Phys. 2003 Dec;30(12):3135-42
pubmed: 14713080
Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):368-74
pubmed: 21617585
Med Phys. 2009 Dec;36(12):5480-7
pubmed: 20095260
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 Jun 1;112(6):582-589
pubmed: 31503283
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 May;11(4):578-82
pubmed: 24635641
Eur Radiol. 2019 Apr;29(4):1665-1673
pubmed: 30255248
Med Phys. 2000 Aug;27(8):1903-14
pubmed: 10984236
Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4389-99
pubmed: 19928069
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 15;192(10):1208-14
pubmed: 26214244
Cureus. 2016 Sep 12;8(9):e778
pubmed: 27752404
Med Phys. 2018 Nov;45(11):5172-5185
pubmed: 30259988
Chest. 2007 Jun;131(6):1800-5
pubmed: 17400670
Radiology. 2008 Dec;249(3):1034-41
pubmed: 18849504
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;66(11):626-631
pubmed: 30062622
J Med Assoc Thai. 2007 Nov;90 Suppl 2:68-73
pubmed: 19230427
Med Phys. 2008 Jun;35(6):2554-7
pubmed: 18649488