The Clinical and Prognostic Impact of the Choice of Surgical Approach to Fourth Ventricular Tumors in a Single-Center, Single-Surgeon Cohort of 92 Consecutive Pediatric Patients.

A single-institution cohort of 92 consecutive pediatric patients harboring tumors involving the fourth ventricle, surgically treated Clinical, radiological, surgical, and pathology details were retrospectively analyzed. We selected n = 6 surgery-related clinical and radiological outcomes: transient and permanent neurological deficits, duration of assisted ventilation, postoperative new onset medical events, postoperative cerebellar mutism, and extent of resection. We built univariate and multivariate logistic models to analyze the significance of relationships between the surgical routes and the outcomes. Cumulative survival (CS) was estimated by the cohort approach. There were 53 girls and 39 boys (mean age, 83 months). Telovelar approach was performed in 51 cases and transvermian approach in 41 cases. Early postoperative MRI studies showed complete removal in 57 cases (62%) and measurable residual tumor in 35 cases (38%). The average tumor residual volume was 1,316 cm With the limitation of a single-center, single-surgeon retrospective series, our findings offer significant data to reconsider the real impact of the choice of the surgical route to the fourth ventricle on the incidence of cerebellar mutism and surgery-related morbidity. This seems to be in line with some recent reports in the literature. Surgical approach to the fourth ventricle should be individualized according to the location of the tumor, degree of vermian infiltration, and lateral and upward extension. Telovelar and transvermian approaches should not be considered alternative but complementary. Pediatric neurosurgeons should fully master both approaches and choose the one that they consider the best for the patient based on a thorough and careful evaluation of pre-operative imaging.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Onorini, Spennato, Orlando, Savoia, Calì, Russo, De Martino, de Santi, Mirone, Ruggiero, Quaglietta and Cinalli.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.