Ovulation suppression following subcutaneous administration of depot medroxyprogesterone acetate.
DMPA
Depo-Provera
Depo-subQ Provera
Pharmacodynamics
Pharmacokinetics
Journal
Contraception: X
ISSN: 2590-1516
Titre abrégé: Contracept X
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767748
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
30
10
2021
revised:
05
02
2022
accepted:
11
02
2022
entrez:
14
3
2022
pubmed:
15
3
2022
medline:
15
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To characterize the relationship between serum medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) concentrations and ovulation suppression, and to estimate the risk of ovulation for investigational subcutaneous regimens of Depo-Provera CI (Depo-Provera) and Depo-subQ Provera 104 (Depo-subQ). We performed a secondary analysis of 2 studies that assessed the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of MPA when Depo-Provera is administered subcutaneously rather than by the labeled intramuscular route. Each woman received a single 45 mg to 300 mg subcutaneous injection of Depo-Provera, a single 104 mg subcutaneous injection of Depo-subQ, or 2 injections of Depo-subQ at 3-month intervals. We used an elevation of serum progesterone ≥4.7 ng/mL as a surrogate for ovulation and non-parametric statistical methods to assess pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationships. This analysis included 101 women with body mass index (BMI) 18 to 34 kg/m The typical MPA concentration associated with loss of ovulation suppression is substantially less than the commonly cited threshold of 0.2 ng/mL. Based on our results, MPA levels would rarely be low enough to permit ovulation if the Depo-subQ reinjection interval were extended to four months or if 150 mg Depo-Provera were injected subcutaneously every 6 months. Extending the three-month Depo-subQ reinjection interval by one month would result in a 25% reduction in yearly MPA exposure, with little risk of pregnancy. Off-label subcutaneous administration of 150 mg Depo-Provera every 6 months would be a highly effective repurposing of an excellent product, with a similar reduction in cumulative exposure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35281554
doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2022.100073
pii: S2590-1516(22)00002-8
pmc: PMC8907671
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
100073Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc.
Références
Clin Ther. 2004 Nov;26(11):1845-54
pubmed: 15639696
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1977 Jan;44(1):32-8
pubmed: 833262
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2003 Dec;30(6):405-16
pubmed: 15000422
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jan 29;44:101273
pubmed: 35128365
Contraception. 2010 Jun;81(6):487-95
pubmed: 20472115
Contraception. 2014 May;89(5):341-3
pubmed: 24267634
Contraception. 2004 Jul;70(1):11-8
pubmed: 15208047
Contracept X. 2021 Oct 02;3:100070
pubmed: 34746745
Contraception. 2009 Jul;80(1):7-17
pubmed: 19501210
Fertil Steril. 2021 Apr;115(4):1035-1043
pubmed: 33485608
Contraception. 2016 Sep;94(3):202-15
pubmed: 26874275
Contraception. 2004 Oct;70(4):269-75
pubmed: 15451329