NEMA NU 2-2018 performance evaluation of a new generation 30-cm axial field-of-view Discovery MI PET/CT.
6-Ring
Discovery MI 6-ring scanner
NEMA NU 2
PET/CT
Performance evaluation
Journal
European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
ISSN: 1619-7089
Titre abrégé: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101140988
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
received:
04
11
2021
accepted:
01
03
2022
pubmed:
15
3
2022
medline:
7
7
2022
entrez:
14
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The DMI PET/CT is a modular silicon photomultiplier-based scanner with an axial field-of-view (FOV) between 15 and 25 cm depending on ring configuration (3, 4, or 5 rings). A new generation of the system includes a reengineered detector module, featuring improved electronics and an additional 6th ring, extending the axial FOV to 30 cm. We report on the performance evaluation of the 6-ring upgraded Generation 2 (Gen2) system while values are also reported for the 5-ring configuration of the very same system prior to the upgrade. PET performance was evaluated using the NEMA NU 2-2018 standard for spatial resolution, sensitivity, image quality, count rate performance, timing resolution, and image co-registration accuracy. Patient images were used to assess image quality. The average system sensitivity was measured at 32.76 cps/kBq (~ 47% increase to 5 rings at 22.29 cps/kBq) while noise equivalent count rate peaked at 434.3 kcps corresponding to 23.6 kBq/mL (~ 60% increase to Generation 1 (Gen1) and 39% to Gen2 5 rings). Contrast recovery ranged between 54.5 and 85.8% similar to 5 rings, while the 6 rings provided lower background variability (2.3-8.5% for 5 rings vs 1.9-6.8% for 6 rings) and lower lung error (4.0% for the 5 rings and 3.16% for the 6 rings). Transverse/axial full width at half-maximum (FWHM) at 1 cm (3.79/4.26 mm) and 10 cm (4.29/4.55 mm), scatter fraction (40.2%), energy resolution (9.63%), and time-of-flight (TOF) resolution (389.6 ps at 0 kBq/mL) were in line to previously reported values measured across different system configurations. Improved patient image quality is obtained with the 6 rings compared to the 5 rings, while image quality is retained even at reduced scan times, enabling WB dynamic acquisitions. The higher sensitivity of the 6-ring DMI compared to the 5-ring configuration may lead to improved image quality of clinical images at reduced scan time. Additionally, it could equally be used to allow improved temporal sampling and/or reduced overall scan time in dynamic acquisitions. Conversely, temporal sampling and scan time could be traded per application to further drive injected dose at lower levels.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35284970
doi: 10.1007/s00259-022-05751-7
pii: 10.1007/s00259-022-05751-7
pmc: PMC9250480
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
3023-3032Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Nucl Med. 2017 Sep;58(9):1511-1518
pubmed: 28450566
Phys Med. 2017 Oct;42:203-210
pubmed: 29173917
Phys Med Biol. 2012 Jul 7;57(13):4077-94
pubmed: 22678106
EJNMMI Phys. 2019 May 10;6(1):8
pubmed: 31076884
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178936
pubmed: 28582472
J Nucl Med. 2019 Jul;60(7):1031-1036
pubmed: 30630944
Med Phys. 2019 Jul;46(7):3025-3033
pubmed: 31069816
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Aug;44(Suppl 1):4-16
pubmed: 28687866