Civic engagement in serious illness, death, and loss: A systematic mixed-methods review.

Civic engagement community development community participation compassionate communities palliative care public health systematic review volunteers

Journal

Palliative medicine
ISSN: 1477-030X
Titre abrégé: Palliat Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8704926

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 16 3 2022
medline: 15 4 2022
entrez: 15 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

New public health approaches to palliative care such as compassionate communities aim to increase capacity in serious illness, death, and loss by involving civic society. Civic engagement has been described in many domains of health; a description of the characteristics, processes, and impact of the initiatives in palliative care is lacking. To systematically describe and compare civic engagement initiatives in palliative care in terms of context, development, impact, and evaluation methods. Systematic, mixed-methods review using a convergent integrated synthesis approach. Registered in Prospero: CRD42020180688. Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, WOS, Embase, PsycINFO) were searched up to November 2021 for publications in English describing civic engagement in serious illness, death, and loss. Additional grey literature was obtained by contacting the first authors. We performed a quality appraisal of the included studies. We included 23 peer-reviewed and 11 grey literature publications, reporting on nineteen unique civic engagement initiatives, mostly in countries with English as one of the official languages. Initiatives involved the community in their development, often through a community-academic partnership. Activities aimed to connect people with palliative care needs to individuals or resources in the community. There was a variety of evaluation aims, methods, outcomes, and strength of evidence. Information on whether or how to sustain the initiatives was generally lacking. This is the first review to systematically describe and compare reported civic engagement initiatives in the domain of palliative care. Future studies would benefit from improved evaluation of impact and sustainability.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
New public health approaches to palliative care such as compassionate communities aim to increase capacity in serious illness, death, and loss by involving civic society. Civic engagement has been described in many domains of health; a description of the characteristics, processes, and impact of the initiatives in palliative care is lacking.
AIM
To systematically describe and compare civic engagement initiatives in palliative care in terms of context, development, impact, and evaluation methods.
DESIGN
Systematic, mixed-methods review using a convergent integrated synthesis approach. Registered in Prospero: CRD42020180688.
DATA SOURCES
Six databases (PubMed, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, WOS, Embase, PsycINFO) were searched up to November 2021 for publications in English describing civic engagement in serious illness, death, and loss. Additional grey literature was obtained by contacting the first authors. We performed a quality appraisal of the included studies.
RESULTS
We included 23 peer-reviewed and 11 grey literature publications, reporting on nineteen unique civic engagement initiatives, mostly in countries with English as one of the official languages. Initiatives involved the community in their development, often through a community-academic partnership. Activities aimed to connect people with palliative care needs to individuals or resources in the community. There was a variety of evaluation aims, methods, outcomes, and strength of evidence. Information on whether or how to sustain the initiatives was generally lacking.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first review to systematically describe and compare reported civic engagement initiatives in the domain of palliative care. Future studies would benefit from improved evaluation of impact and sustainability.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35287517
doi: 10.1177/02692163221077850
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

625-651

Auteurs

Louise D'Eer (L)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium.
Compassionate Community Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan, Brussels, Belgium.

Bert Quintiens (B)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium.
Compassionate Community Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan, Brussels, Belgium.

Lieve Van den Block (L)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium.
Compassionate Community Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan, Brussels, Belgium.

Sarah Dury (S)

Belgian Ageing Studies Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan, Brussels, Belgium.
Compassionate Community Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan, Brussels, Belgium.

Luc Deliens (L)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium.
Compassionate Community Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan, Brussels, Belgium.

Kenneth Chambaere (K)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium.
Compassionate Community Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan, Brussels, Belgium.

Tinne Smets (T)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium.
Compassionate Community Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan, Brussels, Belgium.

Joachim Cohen (J)

End-of-life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Laarbeeklaan, Brussels, Belgium.
Compassionate Community Centre of Expertise (COCO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan, Brussels, Belgium.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH