A pilot study assessing average detrusor pressure garnered from area under a urodynamic curve: Evaluation of clinical outcomes.
Compliance
Cystometry
Detrusor leak point pressure
Spinal dysraphism
Urinary bladder
Urodynamics
Journal
Journal of pediatric urology
ISSN: 1873-4898
Titre abrégé: J Pediatr Urol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101233150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
received:
06
08
2021
revised:
10
02
2022
accepted:
12
02
2022
pubmed:
16
3
2022
medline:
29
6
2022
entrez:
15
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The management of neurogenic bladder mostly relies on urodynamic studies; however, several studies have shown low interobserver reproducibility. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a new objective cystometric parameter was superior to other cystometric measures. A new parameter (pressure adjusted area under curve ratio, PAUC) was formulated from the ratio of area under the cystometry curve to a DLPP-adjusted total area (A The study group consisted of 115 subjects with a median age of 4 (0-23) years at the time of the first urodynamic study. The median follow-up was 6 (5-14) years. PAUC and its derivatives (UMSP and TEFP) had the best discriminative power in predicting high grade hydronephrosis (0.830, 95% CI:0.732-0.927, p < 0.001), worsening in hydronephrosis (0.827, 95% CI:0.723-0.931, p < 0.001), and new scar formation (0.704, 95% CI: 0.576-0.832, p = 0.002). PAUC>0.1 significantly correlated with urinary tract dilatation (p < 0.001) and new scar formation (p = 0.002). In the multivariate analysis, our three parameters and having scars at admission were the only independent risk factors for new scars (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively) and worsening in hydronephrosis (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). Our results show that our three parameters derived from area under the urodynamic curve are more reliable than other urodynamic measures. Their major theoretical advantage is to incorporate all the pressure during filling phase giving a more accurate picture of what the intravesical pressure milleu is. Using these measures, we demonstrated their superiority in predicting clinical outcomes. Major limitations of this study are the retrospectively collected data and lack of longitudinal follow-up starting from infancy in each patient. Our new parameters (PAUC, UMSP and TEFP) which incorporate the impact of entire filling phase pressure changes in the analysis, may be useful tools to identify those patients who are under the risk of kidney damage with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35288043
pii: S1477-5131(22)00074-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2022.02.012
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
325.e1-325.e9Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Journal of Pediatric Urology Company. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflicts of interest Israel Franco, MD Patent holder and Principal in FIAS Inc, a software company making urodynamic work analysis and uroflowmetry.