Effect of a prioritization score on the inter-hospital transfer time management of severe COVID-19 patients: a quasi-experimental intervention study.
COVID-19
critical illness
dispatch centre
emergency care
triage management
Journal
International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care
ISSN: 1464-3677
Titre abrégé: Int J Qual Health Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9434628
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
28 Mar 2022
28 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
04
10
2021
revised:
21
02
2022
accepted:
12
03
2022
pubmed:
16
3
2022
medline:
1
4
2022
entrez:
15
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The overburdening of the healthcare system during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic is driving the need to create new tools to improve the management of inter-hospital transport for patients with a severe COVID-19 infection. The aim of this study was to analyse the usefulness of the application of a prioritization score (IHTCOVID-19) for inter-hospital transfer of patients with COVID-19 infection. The study has a quasi-experimental design and was conducted on the Medical Emergency System, the pre-hospital emergency department of the public company belonging to the Autonomous Government of Catalonia that manages urgent healthcare in the region. Patients with a severe COVID-19 infection requiring inter-hospital transport were consecutively included. The pre-intervention period was from 1 to 31 March 2020, and the intervention period with the IHTCOVID-19 score was from 1 to 30 April 2020 (from 8 am to 8 pm). The prioritization score comprises four priority categories, with Priority 0 being the highest and Priority 3 being the lowest. Inter-hospital transfer (IHT) management times (alert-assignment time, resource management time and total central management time) and their variability were evaluated according to whether or not the IHTCOVID-19 score was applied. A total of 344 IHTs were included: 189 (54.9%) in the pre-intervention period and 155 (45.1%) in the post-intervention period. The majority of patients were male and the most frequent age range was between 50 and 70 years. According to the IHTCOVID-19 score, 12 (3.5%) transfers were classified as Priority 0, 66 (19.4%) as Priority 1, 247 (71.8%) as Priority 2 and 19 (5.6%) as Priority 3. Overall, with the application of the IHTCOVID-19 score, there was a significant reduction in total central management time [from 112.4 (inter-quartile range (IQR) 281.3) to 89.8 min (IQR 154.9); P = 0.012]. This significant reduction was observed in Priority 0 patients [286.2 (IQR 218.5) to 42.0 min (IQR 58); P = 0.018] and Priority 1 patients [130.3 (IQR 297.3) to 75.4 min (IQR 91.1); P = 0.034]. After applying the IHTCOVID-19 score, the average time of the process decreased by 22.6 min, and variability was reduced from 618.1 to 324.0 min. The application of the IHTCOVID-19 score in patients with a severe COVID-19 infection reduces IHT management times and variability.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The overburdening of the healthcare system during the coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) pandemic is driving the need to create new tools to improve the management of inter-hospital transport for patients with a severe COVID-19 infection.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to analyse the usefulness of the application of a prioritization score (IHTCOVID-19) for inter-hospital transfer of patients with COVID-19 infection.
METHODS
METHODS
The study has a quasi-experimental design and was conducted on the Medical Emergency System, the pre-hospital emergency department of the public company belonging to the Autonomous Government of Catalonia that manages urgent healthcare in the region. Patients with a severe COVID-19 infection requiring inter-hospital transport were consecutively included. The pre-intervention period was from 1 to 31 March 2020, and the intervention period with the IHTCOVID-19 score was from 1 to 30 April 2020 (from 8 am to 8 pm). The prioritization score comprises four priority categories, with Priority 0 being the highest and Priority 3 being the lowest. Inter-hospital transfer (IHT) management times (alert-assignment time, resource management time and total central management time) and their variability were evaluated according to whether or not the IHTCOVID-19 score was applied.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 344 IHTs were included: 189 (54.9%) in the pre-intervention period and 155 (45.1%) in the post-intervention period. The majority of patients were male and the most frequent age range was between 50 and 70 years. According to the IHTCOVID-19 score, 12 (3.5%) transfers were classified as Priority 0, 66 (19.4%) as Priority 1, 247 (71.8%) as Priority 2 and 19 (5.6%) as Priority 3. Overall, with the application of the IHTCOVID-19 score, there was a significant reduction in total central management time [from 112.4 (inter-quartile range (IQR) 281.3) to 89.8 min (IQR 154.9); P = 0.012]. This significant reduction was observed in Priority 0 patients [286.2 (IQR 218.5) to 42.0 min (IQR 58); P = 0.018] and Priority 1 patients [130.3 (IQR 297.3) to 75.4 min (IQR 91.1); P = 0.034]. After applying the IHTCOVID-19 score, the average time of the process decreased by 22.6 min, and variability was reduced from 618.1 to 324.0 min.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The application of the IHTCOVID-19 score in patients with a severe COVID-19 infection reduces IHT management times and variability.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35289365
pii: 6548674
doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac011
pmc: PMC8992311
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
J Emerg Med. 2020 Feb;58(2):280-289
pubmed: 31761462
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jun 4;29(1):78
pubmed: 34088335
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2021 Apr-Jun;57(2):113-120
pubmed: 34132207
JAMA. 2007 Nov 28;298(20):2371-80
pubmed: 17982184
BMJ. 2020 May 22;369:m1966
pubmed: 32444366
Emergencias. 2021 Abr;33(2):151-153
pubmed: 33750060
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1003-11
pubmed: 17334242
Rev Med Virol. 2021 Jan;31(1):1-10
pubmed: 32845042
Chest. 2014 Oct;146(4 Suppl):e44S-60S
pubmed: 25144509
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;203(3):287-295
pubmed: 33522881
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jul 1;180(7):934-943
pubmed: 32167524
Emergencias. 2020 Ago;32(4):301-302
pubmed: 32692016
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2020 Oct;44(7):439-445
pubmed: 32402532
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1873-1875
pubmed: 32187459
N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 26;354(4):366-78
pubmed: 16436768
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):282-9
pubmed: 24401167
Emergencias. 2021 Aug;33(4):265-272
pubmed: 34251139
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 23;15(7):e0236240
pubmed: 32702044
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e2012606
pubmed: 32558916
Nat Med. 2020 Aug;26(8):1212-1217
pubmed: 32546823
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Apr;46(2):425-433
pubmed: 30406394
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149
pubmed: 29942800
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Jul;21(7):915-918
pubmed: 32674819
Med Care. 2009 Jul;47(7):787-93
pubmed: 19536030
Heart Lung Circ. 2020 Jul;29(7):e88-e93
pubmed: 32487432