Impact of G-CSF Prophylaxis on Chemotherapy Dose-Intensity, Link Between Dose-Intensity and Survival in Patients with Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 07 2022
Historique:
received: 08 10 2021
accepted: 26 01 2022
pubmed: 16 3 2022
medline: 7 7 2022
entrez: 15 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

In metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, few data are available on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis and its impact on dose-intensity (DI), or the link between DI and progression-free survival (PFS). This study assessed the impact of G-CSF prophylaxis on the DI received by patients and the relationship between full DI and PFS according to chemotherapy regimens. Patients from three first-line randomized phase II clinical trials were included in this retrospective cohort. G-CSF prophylaxis groups were identified and balanced according to baseline characteristics using a propensity score. Patients were classified into 2 treatment groups (FOLFIRINOX vs FOLFIRI/nab-paclitaxel (NAB)). DI was a binary variable (full/reduced). Adverse events were defined using NCI-CTCAE v4.0. Of the 498 patients, 154 (31%) were in "prophylaxis" group; 179 (36%) were treated by FOLFIRINOX and 319 (64%) by FOLFIRI/NAB. In FOLFIRINOX group, G-CSF prophylaxis was significantly associated with a higher rate of full DI (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.52-16.90; P < .01) while in FOLFIRI/NAB group, it was significantly associated with a lower rate of full DI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83; P = .03). Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS (FOLFIRINOX group: HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.16; P = .27; FOLFIRI/NAB group: HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11; P = .22). Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis was associated with a higher rate of full DI with FOLFIRINOX. Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS. These results need to be confirmed prospectively.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
In metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, few data are available on the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) prophylaxis and its impact on dose-intensity (DI), or the link between DI and progression-free survival (PFS). This study assessed the impact of G-CSF prophylaxis on the DI received by patients and the relationship between full DI and PFS according to chemotherapy regimens.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients from three first-line randomized phase II clinical trials were included in this retrospective cohort. G-CSF prophylaxis groups were identified and balanced according to baseline characteristics using a propensity score. Patients were classified into 2 treatment groups (FOLFIRINOX vs FOLFIRI/nab-paclitaxel (NAB)). DI was a binary variable (full/reduced). Adverse events were defined using NCI-CTCAE v4.0.
RESULTS
Of the 498 patients, 154 (31%) were in "prophylaxis" group; 179 (36%) were treated by FOLFIRINOX and 319 (64%) by FOLFIRI/NAB. In FOLFIRINOX group, G-CSF prophylaxis was significantly associated with a higher rate of full DI (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.52-16.90; P < .01) while in FOLFIRI/NAB group, it was significantly associated with a lower rate of full DI (OR, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.06-0.83; P = .03). Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS (FOLFIRINOX group: HR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.59-1.16; P = .27; FOLFIRI/NAB group: HR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.63-1.11; P = .22).
CONCLUSION
Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor prophylaxis was associated with a higher rate of full DI with FOLFIRINOX. Full DI was associated with a non-significant increase in PFS. These results need to be confirmed prospectively.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35289915
pii: 6548878
doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac055
pmc: PMC9255980
doi:

Substances chimiques

Albumins 0
Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor 143011-72-7
Paclitaxel P88XT4IS4D
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e571-e579

Commentaires et corrections

Type : ErratumIn

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

Références

Bull Cancer. 2018 Feb;105(2):146-154
pubmed: 29290332
Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v111-v118
pubmed: 27664247
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jul 1;24(19):3187-205
pubmed: 16682719
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2016 Nov;43(12):1678-1680
pubmed: 28133096
Intern Med. 2020 Mar 15;59(6):877
pubmed: 31735794
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Oct 08;(4):CD003189
pubmed: 18843642
Ann Hematol. 2008 Apr;87(4):277-83
pubmed: 17952688
J Clin Oncol. 1997 Jun;15(6):2403-13
pubmed: 9196156
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Oct 1;33(28):3199-212
pubmed: 26169616
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Oct 10;39(29):3242-3250
pubmed: 34288696
Int Stat Rev. 2017 Aug;85(2):185-203
pubmed: 29307954
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81
pubmed: 9802183
Ann Oncol. 2003 Jan;14(1):29-35
pubmed: 12488289
Blood. 1992 Sep 15;80(6):1430-6
pubmed: 1381626
Ann Oncol. 2015 Dec;26(12):2437-41
pubmed: 26416895
Eur J Cancer. 2011 Jan;47(1):8-32
pubmed: 21095116
N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1817-25
pubmed: 21561347
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 May;2(5):337-346
pubmed: 28397697
Cancer. 2010 Mar 15;116(6):1476-84
pubmed: 20091841
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2008 Apr-Jun;9(2):303-8
pubmed: 18712980
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;22(2):670-6
pubmed: 25155401
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Jun;16(2):103-114.e3
pubmed: 28038865
Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Dec;23(6):1189-1195
pubmed: 29948238
J Clin Oncol. 2001 May 15;19(10):2638-46
pubmed: 11352955
Intern Med. 2019 Jul 15;58(14):1993-2002
pubmed: 30996164
N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 20;379(25):2395-2406
pubmed: 30575490
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Apr;114(3):479-84
pubmed: 18463977
J BUON. 2009 Apr-Jun;14(2):203-9
pubmed: 19650167
N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 31;369(18):1691-703
pubmed: 24131140
Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24(10):2475-2484
pubmed: 23788754
Eur J Cancer. 2006 Oct;42(15):2433-53
pubmed: 16750358
Leuk Lymphoma. 1997 Apr;25(3-4):289-300
pubmed: 9168439
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Sep;136:25-34
pubmed: 32623182

Auteurs

Clémence Canton (C)

Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.
EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.

Olayidé Boussari (O)

EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France.

Mathieu Boulin (M)

EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Department of Pharmacy, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.

Karine Le Malicot (K)

EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France.

Julien Taieb (J)

Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Carpem, Sorbonne Paris City, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.

Laetitia Dahan (L)

Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, La Timone, AMU, Marseille, France.

Anthony Lopez (A)

Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, University Hospital Nancy-Brabois, Nancy, France.

Come Lepage (C)

Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Dijon, Dijon, France.
EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231 University of Burgundy and Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.

Jean-Baptiste Bachet (JB)

Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH