Quality of care in a differentiated HIV service delivery intervention in Tanzania: A mixed-methods study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
31
12
2020
accepted:
28
02
2022
entrez:
15
3
2022
pubmed:
16
3
2022
medline:
4
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Differentiated service delivery (DSD) offers benefits to people living with HIV (improved access, peer support), and the health system (clinic decongestion, efficient service delivery). ART clubs, 15-30 clients who usually meet within the community, are one of the most common DSD options. However, evidence about the quality of care (QoC) delivered in ART clubs is still limited. We conducted a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods study as part of the Test & Treat project in northwest Tanzania. We surveyed QoC among stable clients and health care workers (HCW) comparing between clinics and clubs. Using a Donabedian framework we structured the analysis into three levels of assessment: structure (staff, equipment, supplies, venue), processes (time-spent, screenings, information, HCW-attitude), and outcomes (viral load, CD4 count, retention, self-worth). We surveyed 629 clients (40% in club) and conducted eight focus group discussions, while 24 HCW (25% in club) were surveyed and 22 individual interviews were conducted. Quantitative results revealed that in terms of structure, clubs fared better than clinics except for perceived adequacy of service delivery venue (94.4% vs 50.0%, p = 0.013). For processes, time spent receiving care was significantly more in clinics than clubs (119.9 vs 49.9 minutes). Regarding outcomes, retention was higher in the clubs (97.6% vs 100%), while the proportion of clients with recent viral load <50 copies/ml was higher in clinics (100% vs 94.4%). Qualitative results indicated that quality care was perceived similarly among clients in clinics and clubs but for different reasons. Clinics were generally perceived as places with expertise and clubs as efficient places with peer support and empathy. In describing QoC, HCW emphasized structure-related attributes while clients focused on processes. Outcomes-related themes such as improved client health status, self-worth, and confidentiality were similarly perceived across clients and HCW. We found better structure and process of care in clubs than clinics with comparable outcomes. While QoC was perceived similarly in clinics and clubs, its meaning was understood differently between clients. DSD catered to the individual needs of clients, either technical care in the clinic or proximate and social care in the club. Our findings highlight that both clinic and DSD care are required as many elements of QoC were individually perceived.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Differentiated service delivery (DSD) offers benefits to people living with HIV (improved access, peer support), and the health system (clinic decongestion, efficient service delivery). ART clubs, 15-30 clients who usually meet within the community, are one of the most common DSD options. However, evidence about the quality of care (QoC) delivered in ART clubs is still limited.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a concurrent triangulation mixed-methods study as part of the Test & Treat project in northwest Tanzania. We surveyed QoC among stable clients and health care workers (HCW) comparing between clinics and clubs. Using a Donabedian framework we structured the analysis into three levels of assessment: structure (staff, equipment, supplies, venue), processes (time-spent, screenings, information, HCW-attitude), and outcomes (viral load, CD4 count, retention, self-worth).
RESULTS
We surveyed 629 clients (40% in club) and conducted eight focus group discussions, while 24 HCW (25% in club) were surveyed and 22 individual interviews were conducted. Quantitative results revealed that in terms of structure, clubs fared better than clinics except for perceived adequacy of service delivery venue (94.4% vs 50.0%, p = 0.013). For processes, time spent receiving care was significantly more in clinics than clubs (119.9 vs 49.9 minutes). Regarding outcomes, retention was higher in the clubs (97.6% vs 100%), while the proportion of clients with recent viral load <50 copies/ml was higher in clinics (100% vs 94.4%). Qualitative results indicated that quality care was perceived similarly among clients in clinics and clubs but for different reasons. Clinics were generally perceived as places with expertise and clubs as efficient places with peer support and empathy. In describing QoC, HCW emphasized structure-related attributes while clients focused on processes. Outcomes-related themes such as improved client health status, self-worth, and confidentiality were similarly perceived across clients and HCW.
CONCLUSION
We found better structure and process of care in clubs than clinics with comparable outcomes. While QoC was perceived similarly in clinics and clubs, its meaning was understood differently between clients. DSD catered to the individual needs of clients, either technical care in the clinic or proximate and social care in the club. Our findings highlight that both clinic and DSD care are required as many elements of QoC were individually perceived.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35290989
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265307
pii: PONE-D-20-41086
pmc: PMC8923447
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-HIV Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0265307Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The Shinyanga and Simiyu Test & Treat program in Tanzania is funded by Gilead Sciences (USA). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. [GBG is currently employed by Sanofi Pasteur. Sanofi Pasteur was not involved in any way and did not provide funding for this study]. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Références
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Jul 21;20(Suppl 4):21649
pubmed: 28770595
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 Aug;19(8):968-77
pubmed: 24889337
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 27;14(9):e0222028
pubmed: 31560689
J Infect Dis. 2012 Apr 15;205(8):1230-8
pubmed: 22438396
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;30(5):511-520
pubmed: 30720561
AIDS Care. 2018 Aug;30(8):1010-1016
pubmed: 29471667
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(20):e20236
pubmed: 32443358
PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 23;16(7):e1002874
pubmed: 31335865
PLoS Med. 2018 Sep 19;15(9):e1002659
pubmed: 30231024
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Jul 21;20(Suppl 4):21650
pubmed: 28770594
J Mix Methods Res. 2010 Sep 20;4(4):342-360
pubmed: 22167325
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729
pubmed: 16279964
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Mar 28;20(1):21374
pubmed: 28406273
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2012 Feb;26(2):101-7
pubmed: 22224411
Qual Health Res. 2018 Oct;28(12):1839-1857
pubmed: 30033857
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 25;3(5):e001007
pubmed: 30483408
J Int AIDS Soc. 2012 Jul 11;15 Suppl 2:17389
pubmed: 22789644
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53993
pubmed: 23342056
BMC Public Health. 2019 Oct 28;19(1):1382
pubmed: 31660947
Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2017;69(Suppl 2):107-131
pubmed: 28989188
Trop Med Int Health. 2010 Sep;15(9):1000-7
pubmed: 20636305
J Int AIDS Soc. 2018 Sep;21(9):e25183
pubmed: 30225946
PLoS One. 2014 May 14;9(5):e97353
pubmed: 24828585
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Aug;22(8):e25393
pubmed: 31454178
Trop Med Int Health. 2016 Sep;21(9):1115-23
pubmed: 27300077
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Dec 13;17(1):766
pubmed: 29237401
S Afr Med J. 2010 Mar 30;100(4):224, 226
pubmed: 20459967
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Jun;12(3):188-93
pubmed: 12792008
J Infect Dis. 2007 Dec 1;196 Suppl 3:S464-8
pubmed: 18181695
AIDS Behav. 2020 Apr;24(4):1197-1206
pubmed: 31560093
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 21;375(3):205-7
pubmed: 27468057
Psychol Health Med. 2015;20(4):488-94
pubmed: 25168720
BMC Public Health. 2012 Aug 30;12:716
pubmed: 22935331
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Mar 23;17(1):229
pubmed: 28330486
J Int AIDS Soc. 2019 Oct;22(10):e25396
pubmed: 31588668
PLoS Med. 2019 May 21;16(5):e1002808
pubmed: 31112543
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 20;9(3):e91544
pubmed: 24651523
JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8
pubmed: 3045356
Trop Med Int Health. 2014 May;19(5):514-21
pubmed: 24898272
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 9;17(1):341
pubmed: 28486980
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2016 Winter;15(4):
pubmed: 27856556
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):554-61
pubmed: 26553895