Impact of the National Lockdown Due to the COVID-19 Pandemic On Upper Limb Trauma Workload in Central London: A Multi-Centre Longitudinal Observational Study During Implementation and Ease of National Lockdown.
COVID-19
Coronavirus
Lockdown
Trauma
Upper Limb
Journal
The archives of bone and joint surgery
ISSN: 2345-4644
Titre abrégé: Arch Bone Jt Surg
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101636743
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2022
Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
30
11
2020
accepted:
07
07
2021
entrez:
16
3
2022
pubmed:
17
3
2022
medline:
17
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute upper limb referrals and operative case-mix at the beginning and ease of British lockdown. A longitudinal multicentre observational cohort study was conducted for both upper limb trauma referrals and operative case-mix over a 12-week period (6 weeks from the beginning and 6 weeks from the ease of the national lockdown). Statistical analysis included median (± median absolute deviation), risk and odds ratios, and Fisher's exact test to calculate the statistical significance, set at p ≤ 0.05. There was a 158% (n = 456 vs. 177) increase in upper limb referrals and 133% (n = 91 vs. 39) increase in the operative trauma caseload at the ease of lockdown compared with its commencement. An increase in sporting injuries was demonstrated (p=0.02), specifically cycling (p=0.004, OR=2.58). A significant increase in COVID-19 testing was demonstrated during the ease of lockdown (p=0.0001) with more patients having their management changed during the beginning of the pandemic (9.6% vs. 0.7%, p=0.0001). Of these patients, 47% went on to have delayed surgery within 6 months. No patients who underwent surgery tested positive for COVID-19 infection within 14 days post-operatively and no mortalities were recorded at 30 days. The ease of lockdown has seen upper limb referrals and operations more than double compared to early lockdown. With no patients testing positive for COVID-19 within 14 days of the procedure, this demonstrates that having upper limb surgery during the current pandemic is safe.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
This study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute upper limb referrals and operative case-mix at the beginning and ease of British lockdown.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
A longitudinal multicentre observational cohort study was conducted for both upper limb trauma referrals and operative case-mix over a 12-week period (6 weeks from the beginning and 6 weeks from the ease of the national lockdown). Statistical analysis included median (± median absolute deviation), risk and odds ratios, and Fisher's exact test to calculate the statistical significance, set at p ≤ 0.05.
Results
UNASSIGNED
There was a 158% (n = 456 vs. 177) increase in upper limb referrals and 133% (n = 91 vs. 39) increase in the operative trauma caseload at the ease of lockdown compared with its commencement. An increase in sporting injuries was demonstrated (p=0.02), specifically cycling (p=0.004, OR=2.58). A significant increase in COVID-19 testing was demonstrated during the ease of lockdown (p=0.0001) with more patients having their management changed during the beginning of the pandemic (9.6% vs. 0.7%, p=0.0001). Of these patients, 47% went on to have delayed surgery within 6 months. No patients who underwent surgery tested positive for COVID-19 infection within 14 days post-operatively and no mortalities were recorded at 30 days.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The ease of lockdown has seen upper limb referrals and operations more than double compared to early lockdown. With no patients testing positive for COVID-19 within 14 days of the procedure, this demonstrates that having upper limb surgery during the current pandemic is safe.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35291242
doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2021.53205.2639
pmc: PMC8889424
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
23-31Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflict of interest concerning the materials or methods used in this study or the findings specified in this paper.
Références
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2020 Jul;2(4):175-181
pubmed: 32835183
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan;12(1):22-26
pubmed: 32921952
Injury. 2020 Oct;51(10):2142-2147
pubmed: 32654849
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062
pubmed: 32171076
Int Orthop. 2020 Aug;44(8):1497-1501
pubmed: 32488564
Bone. 2016 Jun;87:19-26
pubmed: 26968752
Hand (N Y). 2012 Mar;7(1):18-22
pubmed: 23449400
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020 Apr 2;81(4):1-6
pubmed: 32343187
Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):627-632
pubmed: 32731774
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0242958
pubmed: 33301459
J Hosp Infect. 2020 Oct;106(2):376-384
pubmed: 32702463
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Oct;11(Suppl 5):S700-S703
pubmed: 32999543
Injury. 2007 Aug;38(8):913-22
pubmed: 17628559
BMJ Qual Saf. 2021 Apr;30(4):283-291
pubmed: 33037143
Lancet. 2020 Jul 4;396(10243):27-38
pubmed: 32479829
Acta Orthop. 2020 Oct;91(5):556-561
pubmed: 32573331
BMJ. 2020 May 12;369:m1808
pubmed: 32398230
Acta Orthop. 2020 Dec;91(6):633-638
pubmed: 32835573
Nature. 2020 Apr;580(7803):E7
pubmed: 32296181
Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 05;172(9):577-582
pubmed: 32150748