Safety and Immunogenicity of a 100 μg mRNA-1273 Vaccine Booster for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).


Journal

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 Mar 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 17 3 2022
medline: 17 3 2022
entrez: 16 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Due to the emergence of highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants, evaluation of boosters is needed. Evaluate safety and immunogenicity of 100-μg of mRNA-1273 booster dose in adults. Open-label, Phase 2/3 study. Multicenter study at 8 sites in the U.S. The mRNA-1273 100-μg booster was administered to adults who previously received a two dose primary series of 100-μg mRNA-1273 in the phase 3 Coronavirus Efficacy (COVE) trial, at least 6 months earlier. Lipid nanoparticle containing 100-μg of mRNA encoding the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-HU-1). Solicited local and systemic adverse reactions, and unsolicited adverse events were collected after vaccination. Primary immunogenicity objectives were to demonstrate non-inferiority of the neutralizing antibody (nAb) response against SARS-CoV-2 based on the geometric mean titer (GMTs) and the seroresponse rates (SRRs) (booster dose vs. primary series in a historical control group). nAbs against SARS-CoV-2 variants were also evaluated. The 100-μg booster dose had a greater incidence of local and systemic adverse reactions compared to the second dose of mRNA-1273 as well as the 50-μg mRNA-1273 booster in separate studies. The geometric mean titers (GMTs; 95% CI) of SARS-CoV-2 nAbs against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 at 28 days after the 100-μg booster dose were 4039.5 (3592.7,4541.8) and 1132.0 (1046.7,1224.2) at 28 days after the second dose in the historical control group [GMT ratio=3.6 (3.1,4.2)]. SRRs (95% CI) were 100% (98.6,100) at 28 days after the booster and 98.1% (96.7,99.1) 28 days after the second dose in the historical control group [percentage difference=1.9% (0.4,3.3)]. The GMT ratio (GMR) and SRR difference for the booster as compared to the primary series met the pre-specified non-inferiority criteria. Delta-specific nAbs also increased (GMT fold-rise=233.3) after the 100-μg booster of mRNA-1273. The 100-μg mRNA-1273 booster induced a robust neutralizing antibody response against SARS-CoV-2, and reactogenicity was higher with the 100-μg booster dose compared to the authorized booster dose level in adults (50-μg). mRNA-1273 100-μg booster dose can be considered when eliciting an antibody response might be challenging such as in moderately or severely immunocompromised hosts. NCT04927065.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35291289
doi: 10.1101/2022.03.04.22271830
pmc: PMC8923111
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04927065']

Types de publication

Preprint

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068614
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068618
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI148684
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068635
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068619
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068636
Pays : United States

Références

Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2258-2276
pubmed: 34863358
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):1063-1071
pubmed: 35189624
Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2093-2100
pubmed: 34756184
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 23;385(13):1244-1246
pubmed: 34379917
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Apr;20(4):229-238
pubmed: 31836872
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 17;386(11):1088-1091
pubmed: 35081298
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529):
pubmed: 33408181
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 23;385(26):2485-2487
pubmed: 34731553
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):1042-1049
pubmed: 35241844
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2025-2031
pubmed: 34526698
J Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 11;226(10):1731-1742
pubmed: 35535503
Science. 2022 Jan 07;375(6576):43-50
pubmed: 34812653
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1393-1400
pubmed: 34525275
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1774-1785
pubmed: 34551225

Auteurs

Spyros Chalkias (S)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Howard Schwartz (H)

CMO Research Centers of America, Hollywood, Florida, USA.

Biliana Nestorova (B)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Jing Feng (J)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Ying Chang (Y)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Honghong Zhou (H)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Frank J Dutko (FJ)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Darin K Edwards (DK)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

David Montefiori (D)

Department of Surgery and Duke Human Vaccine Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Rolando Pajon (R)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Brett Leav (B)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Jacqueline M Miller (JM)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Rituparna Das (R)

Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Classifications MeSH