Safety and Immunogenicity of a 100 μg mRNA-1273 Vaccine Booster for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2).
Journal
medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences
Titre abrégé: medRxiv
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101767986
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 Mar 2022
07 Mar 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
17
3
2022
medline:
17
3
2022
entrez:
16
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Due to the emergence of highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants, evaluation of boosters is needed. Evaluate safety and immunogenicity of 100-μg of mRNA-1273 booster dose in adults. Open-label, Phase 2/3 study. Multicenter study at 8 sites in the U.S. The mRNA-1273 100-μg booster was administered to adults who previously received a two dose primary series of 100-μg mRNA-1273 in the phase 3 Coronavirus Efficacy (COVE) trial, at least 6 months earlier. Lipid nanoparticle containing 100-μg of mRNA encoding the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 (Wuhan-HU-1). Solicited local and systemic adverse reactions, and unsolicited adverse events were collected after vaccination. Primary immunogenicity objectives were to demonstrate non-inferiority of the neutralizing antibody (nAb) response against SARS-CoV-2 based on the geometric mean titer (GMTs) and the seroresponse rates (SRRs) (booster dose vs. primary series in a historical control group). nAbs against SARS-CoV-2 variants were also evaluated. The 100-μg booster dose had a greater incidence of local and systemic adverse reactions compared to the second dose of mRNA-1273 as well as the 50-μg mRNA-1273 booster in separate studies. The geometric mean titers (GMTs; 95% CI) of SARS-CoV-2 nAbs against the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 at 28 days after the 100-μg booster dose were 4039.5 (3592.7,4541.8) and 1132.0 (1046.7,1224.2) at 28 days after the second dose in the historical control group [GMT ratio=3.6 (3.1,4.2)]. SRRs (95% CI) were 100% (98.6,100) at 28 days after the booster and 98.1% (96.7,99.1) 28 days after the second dose in the historical control group [percentage difference=1.9% (0.4,3.3)]. The GMT ratio (GMR) and SRR difference for the booster as compared to the primary series met the pre-specified non-inferiority criteria. Delta-specific nAbs also increased (GMT fold-rise=233.3) after the 100-μg booster of mRNA-1273. The 100-μg mRNA-1273 booster induced a robust neutralizing antibody response against SARS-CoV-2, and reactogenicity was higher with the 100-μg booster dose compared to the authorized booster dose level in adults (50-μg). mRNA-1273 100-μg booster dose can be considered when eliciting an antibody response might be challenging such as in moderately or severely immunocompromised hosts. NCT04927065.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35291289
doi: 10.1101/2022.03.04.22271830
pmc: PMC8923111
pii:
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04927065']
Types de publication
Preprint
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068614
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068618
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI148684
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068635
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068619
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : UM1 AI068636
Pays : United States
Références
Lancet. 2021 Dec 18;398(10318):2258-2276
pubmed: 34863358
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):1063-1071
pubmed: 35189624
Lancet. 2021 Dec 4;398(10316):2093-2100
pubmed: 34756184
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 23;385(13):1244-1246
pubmed: 34379917
Nat Rev Immunol. 2020 Apr;20(4):229-238
pubmed: 31836872
N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 17;386(11):1088-1091
pubmed: 35081298
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416
pubmed: 33378609
Science. 2021 Feb 5;371(6529):
pubmed: 33408181
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 23;385(26):2485-2487
pubmed: 34731553
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):1042-1049
pubmed: 35241844
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2025-2031
pubmed: 34526698
J Infect Dis. 2022 Nov 11;226(10):1731-1742
pubmed: 35535503
Science. 2022 Jan 07;375(6576):43-50
pubmed: 34812653
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 7;385(15):1393-1400
pubmed: 34525275
N Engl J Med. 2021 Nov 4;385(19):1774-1785
pubmed: 34551225