Mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke in COVID-19 patients: multicenter experience in 111 cases.
COVID-19
Infection
Stroke
Thrombectomy
Journal
Journal of neurointerventional surgery
ISSN: 1759-8486
Titre abrégé: J Neurointerv Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517079
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
22
01
2022
accepted:
02
03
2022
pubmed:
17
3
2022
medline:
17
8
2022
entrez:
16
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Data on the frequency and outcome of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) in patients with COVID-19 is limited. Addressing this subject, we report our multicenter experience. A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive acute stroke patients with COVID-19 infection treated with MT at 26 tertiary care centers between January 2020 and November 2021. Baseline demographics, angiographic outcome and clinical outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and 90 days were noted. We identified 111 out of 11 365 (1%) patients with acute or subsided COVID-19 infection who underwent MT due to LVO. Cardioembolic events were the most common etiology for LVO (38.7%). Median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score were 16 (IQR 11.5-20) and 9 (IQR 7-10), respectively. Successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b) was achieved in 97/111 (87.4%) patients and 46/111 (41.4%) patients were reperfused completely. The procedure-related complication rate was 12.6% (14/111). Functional independence was achieved in 20/108 (18.5%) patients at discharge and 14/66 (21.2%) at 90 days follow-up. The in-hospital mortality rate was 30.6% (33/108). In the subgroup analysis, patients with severe acute COVID-19 infection requiring intubation had a mortality rate twice as high as patients with mild or moderate acute COVID-19 infection. Acute respiratory failure requiring ventilation and time interval from symptom onset to groin puncture were independent predictors for an unfavorable outcome in a logistic regression analysis. Our study showed a poor clinical outcome and high mortality, especially in patients with severe acute COVID-19 infection undergoing MT due to LVO.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Data on the frequency and outcome of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) in patients with COVID-19 is limited. Addressing this subject, we report our multicenter experience.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive acute stroke patients with COVID-19 infection treated with MT at 26 tertiary care centers between January 2020 and November 2021. Baseline demographics, angiographic outcome and clinical outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and 90 days were noted.
RESULTS
RESULTS
We identified 111 out of 11 365 (1%) patients with acute or subsided COVID-19 infection who underwent MT due to LVO. Cardioembolic events were the most common etiology for LVO (38.7%). Median baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score and Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score were 16 (IQR 11.5-20) and 9 (IQR 7-10), respectively. Successful reperfusion (mTICI ≥2b) was achieved in 97/111 (87.4%) patients and 46/111 (41.4%) patients were reperfused completely. The procedure-related complication rate was 12.6% (14/111). Functional independence was achieved in 20/108 (18.5%) patients at discharge and 14/66 (21.2%) at 90 days follow-up. The in-hospital mortality rate was 30.6% (33/108). In the subgroup analysis, patients with severe acute COVID-19 infection requiring intubation had a mortality rate twice as high as patients with mild or moderate acute COVID-19 infection. Acute respiratory failure requiring ventilation and time interval from symptom onset to groin puncture were independent predictors for an unfavorable outcome in a logistic regression analysis.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Our study showed a poor clinical outcome and high mortality, especially in patients with severe acute COVID-19 infection undergoing MT due to LVO.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35292572
pii: neurintsurg-2022-018723
doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018723
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
858-862Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: MM: Grants or contracts from Balt, Medtronic, MircroVention and Stryker. FD: Consultant for Balt, Cerus Endovascular, Phenox and Cerenovus, honoraria for lectures from Cerenovus, Acandis and Asahi, support for attending meetings from MicroVention, Acandis and Cerus Endovascular, advisory board member for Cerenovus/Johnson & Johnson, associate editor for Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery. MG: Grants or contracts from Else Kröner Fresenius Stiftung, payment of honoraria for lectures from Phenox, proctoring contract with MircroVention, participation on clinical event committee from MicroVention, chair of ESMINT Examination Committee, received stents from Phenox for research purposes. DK: Grants or contracts from Else Kröner Fresenius Center of Digital Health and Joachim Herz Foundation, spokesman of the “Junge Neuroradiologie” in the German Society of Neuroradiology. CL: Consulting fees, payment of honoraria for lectures and support for attending meetings from Phenox, Penumbra and Acandis. MW: Grants from ab medica, Acandis, Bracco Imaging, Cerenovus, Kaneka Pharmaceuticals, Medtronic, Mentice AB, Microvention, Phenox, Siemens Healthcare and Stryker Neurovascular; Consulting fees from Stryker Healthcare; Payment honoraria for lectures from Stryker Neurovascular. The other authors declare no specific conflict of interest.