Total Ankle Replacement Provides Symmetrical Postoperative Kinematics: A Biplane Fluoroscopy Imaging Study.
biplane fluoroscopy
kinematics
subtalar joint
total ankle replacement
Journal
Foot & ankle international
ISSN: 1944-7876
Titre abrégé: Foot Ankle Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9433869
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
17
3
2022
medline:
7
6
2022
entrez:
16
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In vivo measurements of tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion following TAR are unavailable. Using biplane fluoroscopy, we tested the hypothesis that the prosthetic tibiotalar joint and adjacent subtalar joint would demonstrate kinematic and range of motion differences compared to the contralateral untreated limb, and control participants. Six patients of 41 identified candidates that all underwent unilateral Zimmer TAR (5.4 ± 1.9 years prior) and 6 control participants were imaged with biplane fluoroscopy during overground walking and a double heel-rise activity. Computed tomography scans were acquired; images were segmented and processed to serve as input for model-based tracking of the biplane fluoroscopy data. Measurements included tibiotalar and subtalar kinematics for the TAR, untreated contralateral, and control limbs. Statistical parametric mapping quantified differences in kinematics throughout overground walking and the double heel-rise activity. Patients with this TAR performed walking and heel-rise activities symmetrically with no significant kinematic differences at the tibiotalar and subtalar joints between limbs. Compared to control participants, patients exhibited reduced dorsi/plantarflexion range of motion that corresponded to decreased peak dorsiflexion, but only in the late stance phase of walking. This reduction in tibiotalar dorsi/plantarflexion range of motion in the TAR group became more apparent with double heel-rise activity. Patients with a Zimmer TAR had symmetric kinematics during activities of walking and double heel-rise, but they did exhibit minor compensations in tibiotalar kinematics as compared to controls. The lack of significant kinematic compensation at the subtalar joint may explain why secondary subtalar osteoarthritis is reported as being relatively uncommon in patients with some TAR designs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
In vivo measurements of tibiotalar and subtalar joint motion following TAR are unavailable. Using biplane fluoroscopy, we tested the hypothesis that the prosthetic tibiotalar joint and adjacent subtalar joint would demonstrate kinematic and range of motion differences compared to the contralateral untreated limb, and control participants.
METHODS
Six patients of 41 identified candidates that all underwent unilateral Zimmer TAR (5.4 ± 1.9 years prior) and 6 control participants were imaged with biplane fluoroscopy during overground walking and a double heel-rise activity. Computed tomography scans were acquired; images were segmented and processed to serve as input for model-based tracking of the biplane fluoroscopy data. Measurements included tibiotalar and subtalar kinematics for the TAR, untreated contralateral, and control limbs. Statistical parametric mapping quantified differences in kinematics throughout overground walking and the double heel-rise activity.
RESULTS
Patients with this TAR performed walking and heel-rise activities symmetrically with no significant kinematic differences at the tibiotalar and subtalar joints between limbs. Compared to control participants, patients exhibited reduced dorsi/plantarflexion range of motion that corresponded to decreased peak dorsiflexion, but only in the late stance phase of walking. This reduction in tibiotalar dorsi/plantarflexion range of motion in the TAR group became more apparent with double heel-rise activity.
CONCLUSION
Patients with a Zimmer TAR had symmetric kinematics during activities of walking and double heel-rise, but they did exhibit minor compensations in tibiotalar kinematics as compared to controls.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
The lack of significant kinematic compensation at the subtalar joint may explain why secondary subtalar osteoarthritis is reported as being relatively uncommon in patients with some TAR designs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35293257
doi: 10.1177/10711007221078001
pmc: PMC9980879
mid: NIHMS1772740
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
818-829Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R21 AR069773
Pays : United States
Références
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2012;15(3):295-301
pubmed: 21756121
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Oct;30(10):933-44
pubmed: 19796586
Foot Ankle Clin. 2000 Dec;5(4):761-75
pubmed: 11232468
J Orthop Res. 2022 Mar;40(3):685-694
pubmed: 33913547
PeerJ. 2016 Nov 2;4:e2652
pubmed: 27833816
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 Feb;32(2):113-9
pubmed: 21288409
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Nov;42(11):1431-1438
pubmed: 34142574
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Apr 1;102(7):600-608
pubmed: 32079879
J Biomech. 2015 May 1;48(7):1277-85
pubmed: 25817475
J Biomech. 1977;10(4):261-8
pubmed: 858732
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Jan 20;103(2):131-138
pubmed: 33298797
Acta Physiol (Oxf). 2006 Feb;186(2):127-39
pubmed: 16497190
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Nov-Dec;20(10):739-44
pubmed: 17106388
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Dec 18;95(24):e191(1-10)
pubmed: 24352777
Foot Ankle Clin. 2008 Sep;13(3):381-400, viii
pubmed: 18692006
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Mar 17;103(6):477-482
pubmed: 33464768
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Nov;34(11):1479-85
pubmed: 23774467
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88(3):526-35
pubmed: 16510818
Foot Ankle Int. 2019 Oct;40(10):1122-1128
pubmed: 31327242
Bone Joint J. 2013 Nov;95-B(11):1500-7
pubmed: 24151270
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Jun;34(6):993-9
pubmed: 16452268
Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Oct;34(10):1340-8
pubmed: 23669163
J Biomech. 2002 Apr;35(4):543-8
pubmed: 11934426
Foot Ankle Spec. 2023 Feb;16(1):20-27
pubmed: 33472419
J Appl Biomech. 2014 Jun;30(3):461-70
pubmed: 24584728
Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Jan;29(1):3-9
pubmed: 18275730
Foot Ankle Int. 2021 Jan;42(1):31-37
pubmed: 32985282
Foot Ankle Int. 2017 Nov;38(11):1183-1187
pubmed: 28810805
J Biomech. 2010 Jul 20;43(10):1976-82
pubmed: 20434726
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 Mar;93(3):293-7
pubmed: 21357948
J Orthop Surg Res. 2008 Sep 04;3:38
pubmed: 18771582
Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502
pubmed: 13498604
Physiotherapy. 2011 Sep;97(3):182-9
pubmed: 21820535
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Oct;37(10):1119-1129
pubmed: 27354397
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020 May 05;8:375
pubmed: 32432091
Joints. 2017 Jun 05;5(1):12-16
pubmed: 29114624
Iowa Orthop J. 2005;25:44-6
pubmed: 16089071
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 May 19;103(10):869-878
pubmed: 33983146
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2009 Nov;64(11):1190-8
pubmed: 19643842
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Mar 13;112(11):177-84
pubmed: 25837859
Proc Biol Sci. 2013 Feb 13;280(1756):20122784
pubmed: 23407831
J Biomech Eng. 2016 Sep 1;138(9):
pubmed: 27455417
J Biomech. 2013 Sep 27;46(14):2394-401
pubmed: 23948374
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Jan;468(1):199-208
pubmed: 19618248
Gait Posture. 2015 May;41(4):888-93
pubmed: 25864769
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Mar 21;100(6):505-515
pubmed: 29557867
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Jul;(424):2
pubmed: 15241136
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Jan;37(1):24-32
pubmed: 26337948