It's time for a minimum synoptic operation template in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Operation notes
Patient safety
Synoptic reporting
Journal
World journal of emergency surgery : WJES
ISSN: 1749-7922
Titre abrégé: World J Emerg Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101266603
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 03 2022
17 03 2022
Historique:
received:
31
12
2021
accepted:
07
01
2022
entrez:
17
3
2022
pubmed:
18
3
2022
medline:
26
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Despite the call to enhance accuracy and value of operation records few international recommended minimal standards for operative notes documentation have been described. This study undertook a systematic review of existing operative reporting systems for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to fashion a comprehensive, synoptic operative reporting template for the future. A search for all relevant articles was conducted using PubMed version of Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases in June 2021, for publications from January 1st 2011 to October 25th 2021, using the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND operation notes OR operative notes OR proforma OR documentation OR report OR narrative OR audio-visual OR synoptic OR digital. Two reviewers (NOC, GMC) independently assessed each published study using a MINORS score of ≥ 16 for comparative and ≥ 10 for non-comparative for inclusion. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. Synoptic operative templates from published data were assimilated into one "ideal" laparoscopic operative report template following international input from the World Society of Emergency Surgery board. A total of 3567 articles were reviewed. Following MINORS grading 25 studies were selected spanning 14 countries and 4 continents. Twenty-two studies were prospective. A holistic overview of the operative procedure documentation was reported in 6/25 studies and a further 19 papers dealt with selective surgical aspects of LC. A unique synoptic LC operative reporting template was developed and translated into Chinese/Mandarin, French and Arabic. This systematic review identified a paucity of publications dealing with operative reporting of LC. The proposed new template may be integrated digitally with hospitals' medical systems and include additional narrative text and audio-visual data. The template may help define new OR (operating room) recording standards and impact on care for patients undergoing LC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Despite the call to enhance accuracy and value of operation records few international recommended minimal standards for operative notes documentation have been described. This study undertook a systematic review of existing operative reporting systems for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to fashion a comprehensive, synoptic operative reporting template for the future.
METHODS
A search for all relevant articles was conducted using PubMed version of Medline, Scopus and Web of Science databases in June 2021, for publications from January 1st 2011 to October 25th 2021, using the keywords: laparoscopic cholecystectomy AND operation notes OR operative notes OR proforma OR documentation OR report OR narrative OR audio-visual OR synoptic OR digital. Two reviewers (NOC, GMC) independently assessed each published study using a MINORS score of ≥ 16 for comparative and ≥ 10 for non-comparative for inclusion. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO. Synoptic operative templates from published data were assimilated into one "ideal" laparoscopic operative report template following international input from the World Society of Emergency Surgery board.
RESULTS
A total of 3567 articles were reviewed. Following MINORS grading 25 studies were selected spanning 14 countries and 4 continents. Twenty-two studies were prospective. A holistic overview of the operative procedure documentation was reported in 6/25 studies and a further 19 papers dealt with selective surgical aspects of LC. A unique synoptic LC operative reporting template was developed and translated into Chinese/Mandarin, French and Arabic.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review identified a paucity of publications dealing with operative reporting of LC. The proposed new template may be integrated digitally with hospitals' medical systems and include additional narrative text and audio-visual data. The template may help define new OR (operating room) recording standards and impact on care for patients undergoing LC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35296354
doi: 10.1186/s13017-022-00411-5
pii: 10.1186/s13017-022-00411-5
pmc: PMC8928637
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
15Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):491-9
pubmed: 19144931
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):617-623
pubmed: 32432660
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):73-86
pubmed: 29095575
Surgery. 2014 Mar;155(3):384-9
pubmed: 24439739
Ir Med J. 2016 Jan;109(1):332-4
pubmed: 26904788
World J Surg. 2019 Sep;43(9):2175-2185
pubmed: 31049605
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 Jan;76(1 Suppl):8-10
pubmed: 8017801
HPB (Oxford). 2014 Sep;16(9):859-63
pubmed: 24635851
Cir Cir. 2018;86(2):152-156
pubmed: 29809180
Br J Surg. 2021 Jun 22;108(6):613-621
pubmed: 34157080
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 Oct;165:13-23
pubmed: 30337068
Resid Staff Physician. 1983 Feb;29(2):109-110
pubmed: 10258884
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;29(3):1797-1804
pubmed: 34523005
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4608-19
pubmed: 23892759
Ann Surg. 2020 Jan;271(1):122-127
pubmed: 29916872
J Med Assoc Thai. 2016 Nov;99 Suppl 8:S43-S47
pubmed: 29901905
Br J Surg. 2013 Feb;100(3):426-32
pubmed: 23255237
Am J Surg. 2018 Nov;216(5):935-940
pubmed: 29937324
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Mar;87(3):143-148
pubmed: 27770497
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Sep;73(9):712-6
pubmed: 12956787
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2019 Jul 11;4(1):e000324
pubmed: 31392281
World J Emerg Surg. 2019 Mar 14;14:12
pubmed: 30911325
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
HPB (Oxford). 2018 Apr;20(4):370-378
pubmed: 29397335
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2018 Feb;22(1):52-57
pubmed: 29536056
Surg Endosc. 2019 Jan;33(1):110-121
pubmed: 29956029
Br J Surg. 2011 Oct;98(10):1431-6
pubmed: 21633952
World J Emerg Surg. 2015 Mar 08;10:14
pubmed: 25870652
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Feb;103(2):342-6
pubmed: 14754706
Surgery. 2007 Jun;141(6):708-14
pubmed: 17560246
World J Surg. 2013 Aug;37(8):1841-50
pubmed: 23604304
World J Surg. 2021 Jan;45(1):81-87
pubmed: 32888062
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Feb;218(2):170-8
pubmed: 24440064
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Feb;230(2):200-206
pubmed: 31726214
Int J Surg. 2016 Mar;27:17-20
pubmed: 26804350
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):79-85
pubmed: 21792718
Arch Surg. 2010 Sep;145(9):865-71
pubmed: 20855757
J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Apr;10(2):62-7
pubmed: 24761077
Am J Surg. 2019 Sep;218(3):624-630
pubmed: 31130211
World J Emerg Surg. 2020 Nov 5;15(1):61
pubmed: 33153472
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 Feb;29(2):206-212
pubmed: 30256167
Br J Surg. 2021 Apr 30;108(4):342-345
pubmed: 33783479
J Pak Med Assoc. 2019 Mar;69(3):409-411
pubmed: 30890836
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2017 Feb 2;78(2):104-107
pubmed: 28165791
Surg Endosc. 2020 Oct;34(10):4549-4561
pubmed: 31732855