Resting-state theta activity is linked to information content-specific coding levels during response inhibition.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 03 2022
16 03 2022
Historique:
received:
10
05
2021
accepted:
07
03
2022
entrez:
17
3
2022
pubmed:
18
3
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The neurophysiological processes underlying the inhibition of impulsive responses have been studied extensively. While also the role of theta oscillations during response inhibition is well examined, the relevance of resting-state theta activity for inhibitory control processes is largely unknown. We test the hypothesis that there are specific relationships between resting-state theta activity and sensory/motor coding levels during response inhibition using EEG methods. We show that resting theta activity is specifically linked to the stimulus-related fraction of neurophysiological activity in specific time windows during motor inhibition. In contrast, concomitantly coded processes related to decision-making or response selection as well as the behavioral inhibition performance were not associated with resting theta activity. Even at the peak of task-related theta power, where task-related theta activity and resting theta activity differed the most, there was still predominantly a significant correlation between both types of theta activity. This suggests that aspects similar to resting dynamics are evident in the proportion of inhibition-related neurophysiological activity that reflects an "alarm" signal, whose function is to process and indicate the need for cognitive control. Thus, specific aspects of task-related theta power may build upon resting theta activity when cognitive control is necessary.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35296740
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08510-8
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-08510-8
pmc: PMC8927579
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4530Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Sep 30;8:761
pubmed: 25324759
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Sep;70(3):1086-101
pubmed: 8229160
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Mar;38(3):1333-1346
pubmed: 27862666
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Mar;87(3):279-88
pubmed: 23073074
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Apr;39(4):1839-1849
pubmed: 29334155
Psychophysiology. 2013 Mar;50(3):253-65
pubmed: 23316862
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Sep;24(9):2430-5
pubmed: 23588188
Psychophysiology. 2011 Dec;48(12):1631-47
pubmed: 21895682
Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):712-22
pubmed: 26751830
PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43957
pubmed: 22952823
Cereb Cortex. 2011 Nov;21(11):2498-506
pubmed: 21422270
Neuropsychologia. 2016 Nov;92:20-30
pubmed: 27422540
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;22(9):741-744
pubmed: 30122169
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jun;21(6):1204-14
pubmed: 18752407
J Neurophysiol. 2010 Feb;103(2):827-43
pubmed: 20007502
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Nov;221(8):3949-3961
pubmed: 26543023
Neuroimage. 2019 Mar;188:135-144
pubmed: 30517844
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Oct;8(4):397-413
pubmed: 1761706
Brain Res. 2007 May 7;1148:161-9
pubmed: 17362884
J Neurosci. 2018 Jan 17;38(3):755-764
pubmed: 29167403
Psychophysiology. 2012 Feb;49(2):220-38
pubmed: 22091878
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 2;8(1):16235
pubmed: 30390016
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Dec;39(12):5050-5061
pubmed: 30133058
Brain Struct Funct. 2017 Nov;222(8):3819-3831
pubmed: 28470552
Neuroimage. 2017 Apr 1;149:44-52
pubmed: 28130191
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Dec;36(12):5003-17
pubmed: 26333392
Annu Rev Psychol. 2013;64:135-68
pubmed: 23020641
Neuroimage. 2011 Apr 15;55(4):1771-8
pubmed: 21256235
Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Apr;8(4):170-7
pubmed: 15050513
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:117052
pubmed: 32540357
Prog Neurobiol. 2013 Sep;108:44-79
pubmed: 23856628
Science. 2004 Jun 25;304(5679):1926-9
pubmed: 15218136
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:156869
pubmed: 21253357
Clin Neurophysiol. 2014 Jan;125(1):124-32
pubmed: 23891195
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Apr;75:1-21
pubmed: 28137458
Neuropsychologia. 2017 Oct;105:123-134
pubmed: 28159617
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:419-51
pubmed: 15217339
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Apr;38(4):1941-1951
pubmed: 28045223
Brain Struct Funct. 2019 Apr;224(3):1291-1300
pubmed: 30701308
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019 Feb;58(2):242-255.e2
pubmed: 30738551
Brain Struct Funct. 2016 Nov;221(8):4091-4101
pubmed: 26608829
J Neurophysiol. 2006 May;95(5):2987-3000
pubmed: 16467430
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Aug;18(8):414-21
pubmed: 24835663
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Aug 29;356(1412):1293-322
pubmed: 11545704
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Mar;87(3):217-33
pubmed: 22906815
Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Dec 15;41(18):5114-5127
pubmed: 32822109
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:575-585
pubmed: 28647483
J Neurosci. 2005 Jan 19;25(3):604-13
pubmed: 15659596
Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2002;24 Suppl D:5-12
pubmed: 12575463
Science. 2016 Apr 8;352(6282):216-20
pubmed: 27124457
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Nov;36(11):4383-93
pubmed: 26354091
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 May;22(5):918-30
pubmed: 19366288
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Nov;38(11):5681-5690
pubmed: 28782869
Neuroscience. 2010 Mar 10;166(1):178-84
pubmed: 20034542
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Jul 30;250:7-21
pubmed: 25455337
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 1;25(2):471-7
pubmed: 15784426
Clin Neurophysiol. 2002 May;113(5):702-12
pubmed: 11976050
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2697-706
pubmed: 19878726
Hum Brain Mapp. 2019 Oct 1;40(14):4253-4265
pubmed: 31219652
Psychophysiology. 2008 Jan;45(1):152-70
pubmed: 17850238
Biol Psychol. 2019 Sep;146:107732
pubmed: 31344371
Neurosci Behav Physiol. 2008 Sep;38(7):677-85
pubmed: 18720013
Trends Neurosci. 2014 Sep;37(9):480-90
pubmed: 25034536
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018 Mar;86:150-165
pubmed: 29223770
Neuroimage. 2005 May 1;25(4):1056-67
pubmed: 15850724