Predicting Acceptance of e-Mental Health Interventions in Patients With Obesity by Using an Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance Model: Cross-sectional Study.
UTAUT
acceptance
e–mental health
mobile phone
obesity
Journal
JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Mar 2022
17 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
14
06
2021
accepted:
30
12
2021
revised:
08
10
2021
entrez:
17
3
2022
pubmed:
18
3
2022
medline:
18
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The rapid increase in the number of people who are overweight and obese is a worldwide health problem. Obesity is often associated with physiological and mental health burdens. Owing to several barriers to face-to-face psychotherapy, a promising approach is to exploit recent developments and implement innovative e-mental health interventions that offer various benefits to patients with obesity and to the health care system. This study aims to assess the acceptance of e-mental health interventions in patients with obesity and explore its influencing predictors. In addition, the well-established Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model is compared with an extended UTAUT model in terms of variance explanation of acceptance. A cross-sectional web-based survey study was conducted from July 2020 to January 2021 in Germany. Eligibility requirements were adult age (≥18 years), internet access, good command of the German language, and BMI >30 kg/m Overall, the acceptance of e-mental health interventions in patients with obesity was moderate (mean 3.18, SD 1.11). Significant differences in the acceptance of e-mental health interventions among patients with obesity exist, depending on the grade of obesity, age, sex, occupational status, and mental health status. In an extended UTAUT regression model, acceptance was significantly predicted by the depression score (Patient Health Questionnaire-8; β=.07; P=.03), stress owing to constant availability via mobile phone or email (β=.06; P=.02), and confidence in using digital media (β=-0.058; P=.04) and by the UTAUT core predictors performance expectancy (β=.45; P<.001), effort expectancy (β=.22; P<.001), and social influence (β=.27; P<.001). The comparison between an extended UTAUT model (16 predictors) and the restrictive UTAUT model (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence) revealed a significant difference in explained variance (F The UTAUT model has proven to be a valuable instrument to predict the acceptance of e-mental health interventions in patients with obesity. The extended UTAUT model explained a significantly high percentage of variance in acceptance (in total 73.6%). On the basis of the strong association between acceptance and future use, new interventions should focus on these UTAUT predictors to promote the establishment of effective e-mental health interventions for patients with obesity who experience mental health burdens.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The rapid increase in the number of people who are overweight and obese is a worldwide health problem. Obesity is often associated with physiological and mental health burdens. Owing to several barriers to face-to-face psychotherapy, a promising approach is to exploit recent developments and implement innovative e-mental health interventions that offer various benefits to patients with obesity and to the health care system.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to assess the acceptance of e-mental health interventions in patients with obesity and explore its influencing predictors. In addition, the well-established Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model is compared with an extended UTAUT model in terms of variance explanation of acceptance.
METHODS
METHODS
A cross-sectional web-based survey study was conducted from July 2020 to January 2021 in Germany. Eligibility requirements were adult age (≥18 years), internet access, good command of the German language, and BMI >30 kg/m
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, the acceptance of e-mental health interventions in patients with obesity was moderate (mean 3.18, SD 1.11). Significant differences in the acceptance of e-mental health interventions among patients with obesity exist, depending on the grade of obesity, age, sex, occupational status, and mental health status. In an extended UTAUT regression model, acceptance was significantly predicted by the depression score (Patient Health Questionnaire-8; β=.07; P=.03), stress owing to constant availability via mobile phone or email (β=.06; P=.02), and confidence in using digital media (β=-0.058; P=.04) and by the UTAUT core predictors performance expectancy (β=.45; P<.001), effort expectancy (β=.22; P<.001), and social influence (β=.27; P<.001). The comparison between an extended UTAUT model (16 predictors) and the restrictive UTAUT model (performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and social influence) revealed a significant difference in explained variance (F
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The UTAUT model has proven to be a valuable instrument to predict the acceptance of e-mental health interventions in patients with obesity. The extended UTAUT model explained a significantly high percentage of variance in acceptance (in total 73.6%). On the basis of the strong association between acceptance and future use, new interventions should focus on these UTAUT predictors to promote the establishment of effective e-mental health interventions for patients with obesity who experience mental health burdens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35297769
pii: v6i3e31229
doi: 10.2196/31229
pmc: PMC8972105
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e31229Informations de copyright
©Vanessa Rentrop, Mirjam Damerau, Adam Schweda, Jasmin Steinbach, Lynik Chantal Schüren, Marco Niedergethmann, Eva-Maria Skoda, Martin Teufel, Alexander Bäuerle. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 17.03.2022.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 05;15(9):e193
pubmed: 24007949
Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Apr;27(2):139-46
pubmed: 23731876
J Anxiety Disord. 2018 Apr;55:70-78
pubmed: 29422409
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Mar 15;15:103
pubmed: 25889884
Behav Res Ther. 2011 Nov;49(11):729-36
pubmed: 21851929
Digit Health. 2020 Jan 07;6:2055207619898987
pubmed: 32030193
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Apr;5(7):161
pubmed: 28480197
Psychiatr Prax. 2017 Jul;44(5):286-295
pubmed: 28403502
Obes Res. 2002 Aug;10(8):816-23
pubmed: 12181391
Curr Obes Rep. 2015 Sep;4(3):303-10
pubmed: 26627487
World Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;13(3):288-95
pubmed: 25273302
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 21;20(8):e244
pubmed: 30131313
Depress Res Treat. 2014;2014:790457
pubmed: 24804089
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Mar;67(3):220-9
pubmed: 20194822
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jun;90:22-31
pubmed: 27103194
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2020 Jun;28(6):1010-1012
pubmed: 32294297
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr 16;15:162
pubmed: 25888988
J Postgrad Med. 2017 Jul-Sep;63(3):182-190
pubmed: 28695871
J Public Health (Oxf). 2020 Nov 23;42(4):672-678
pubmed: 32657323
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 22;14(3):e91
pubmed: 22743581
Adv Nutr. 2017 May 15;8(3):449-462
pubmed: 28507010
J Health Commun. 2017 Mar;22(3):274-284
pubmed: 28248626
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 23;18(12):e337
pubmed: 28011445
J Affect Disord. 2020 Nov 1;276:45-52
pubmed: 32697715
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e039646
pubmed: 32792455
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 10;11(6):e0157240
pubmed: 27285386
Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(5):447-55
pubmed: 24901351
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 03;17(6):e136
pubmed: 26041682
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014 Feb 21;8(2):230-237
pubmed: 24876572
Neuropsychiatr. 2012;26(4):159-65
pubmed: 23179359
Lancet. 2014 Aug 30;384(9945):766-81
pubmed: 24880830
Health Commun. 2020 Mar;35(3):350-355
pubmed: 32013612
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Aug 06;10:231
pubmed: 20691097
J Clin Psychol. 2011 Feb;67(2):184-92
pubmed: 21128304
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 21;8(11):e79206
pubmed: 24278121
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Jan 5;17(1):6
pubmed: 28056832
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jun;100(6):1019-28
pubmed: 20075322
Psychiatr Prax. 2020 Oct;47(7):388-391
pubmed: 32268415
Australas Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;19(3):259-64
pubmed: 21682626
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Jul;105(1):30-9
pubmed: 24862240
J Affect Disord. 2015 May 1;176:9-17
pubmed: 25682378
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2021 Dec;17(12):2065-2080
pubmed: 34474983
Pain. 2020 May;161(5):889-893
pubmed: 32251203
J Affect Disord. 2009 Apr;114(1-3):163-73
pubmed: 18752852
Int J Med Inform. 2017 May;101:75-84
pubmed: 28347450
World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2000;894:i-xii, 1-253
pubmed: 11234459
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 25;7(10):e12612
pubmed: 31654566