Retweet communities reveal the main sources of hate speech.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 17 05 2021
accepted: 02 03 2022
entrez: 17 3 2022
pubmed: 18 3 2022
medline: 6 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We address a challenging problem of identifying main sources of hate speech on Twitter. On one hand, we carefully annotate a large set of tweets for hate speech, and deploy advanced deep learning to produce high quality hate speech classification models. On the other hand, we create retweet networks, detect communities and monitor their evolution through time. This combined approach is applied to three years of Slovenian Twitter data. We report a number of interesting results. Hate speech is dominated by offensive tweets, related to political and ideological issues. The share of unacceptable tweets is moderately increasing with time, from the initial 20% to 30% by the end of 2020. Unacceptable tweets are retweeted significantly more often than acceptable tweets. About 60% of unacceptable tweets are produced by a single right-wing community of only moderate size. Institutional Twitter accounts and media accounts post significantly less unacceptable tweets than individual accounts. In fact, the main sources of unacceptable tweets are anonymous accounts, and accounts that were suspended or closed during the years 2018-2020.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35298556
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265602
pii: PONE-D-21-16242
pmc: PMC8929563
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0265602

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

PLoS One. 2016 May 05;11(5):e0155036
pubmed: 27149621
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 4;11(1):19655
pubmed: 34608258
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 11;11(11):e0166586
pubmed: 27835683
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Nov 15;102(46):16569-72
pubmed: 16275915
Appl Netw Sci. 2016;1(1):2
pubmed: 30533494
Appl Netw Sci. 2021;6(1):20
pubmed: 33718589
Sci Rep. 2016 Dec 01;6:37825
pubmed: 27905402
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 13;13(3):e0194317
pubmed: 29534112
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 20;14(8):e0221152
pubmed: 31430308
Comput Soc Netw. 2017;4(1):6
pubmed: 29266132
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 18;15(6):e0234689
pubmed: 32555659
Appl Netw Sci. 2021;6(1):96
pubmed: 34957317
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 11;11(1):22083
pubmed: 34764344
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 1;16(9):e0256175
pubmed: 34469456

Auteurs

Bojan Evkoski (B)

Department of Knowledge Technologies, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Andraž Pelicon (A)

Department of Knowledge Technologies, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Igor Mozetič (I)

Department of Knowledge Technologies, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Nikola Ljubešić (N)

Department of Knowledge Technologies, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Faculty of Information and Communication Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Petra Kralj Novak (P)

Department of Knowledge Technologies, Jozef Stefan Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH