Impact of legislative reform on worker fatalities in New Zealand workplaces: a 30-year retrospective population-level analysis.

accidents epidemiology injury mortality wounds and Injuries

Journal

Occupational and environmental medicine
ISSN: 1470-7926
Titre abrégé: Occup Environ Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9422759

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 04 10 2021
accepted: 18 02 2022
entrez: 18 3 2022
pubmed: 19 3 2022
medline: 19 3 2022
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To determine the impact of major legislative changes to New Zealand's Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) legislation with the adoption of the Robens model as a means to control occupational risks on the burden and risk of work-related fatal injury (WRFI). Population-based comparison of WRFI to workers aged 15-84 years occurring during three periods: before (pre:1985-1992), after legislative reform (post-1:1993-2002) and after subsequent amendment (post-2:2003-2014). Annual age-industry standardised rates were calculated with 95% CI. Multivariable Poisson regression was used to estimate age-adjusted annual percentage changes (APC) for each period, overall and stratified by high-risk industry and occupational groups. Over the 30-year period, 2053 worker deaths met the eligibility criteria. Age-adjusted APC in rates of worker WRFI changed little between periods: pre (-2.8%, 95% CI 0.0% to -5.5%); post-1 (-2.9%, 95% CI -1.3% to -4.5%) and post-2 (-2.9%, 95% CI -1.3% to -4.4%). There was no evidence of differences in slope. Variable trends in worker WRFI were observed for historically high-risk industry and occupational groups. The rate of worker WRFI decreased steadily over the 30-year period under examination and there was no evidence that this pattern of declining WRFI was substantially altered with the introduction of Robens-styled OHS legislative reforms. Beyond headline figures, historically high-risk groups had highly variable progress in reducing worker WRFI following legislative reform. This study demonstrates the value in including prereform data and high-risk subgroup analysis when assessing the performance of OHS legislative reforms to control occupational risks.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35301262
pii: oemed-2021-108054
doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-108054
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Rebbecca Lilley (R)

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand rebbecca.lilley@otago.ac.nz.

Gabrielle Davie (G)

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Bronwen McNoe (B)

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Simon Horsburgh (S)

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Tim R Driscoll (TR)

School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Colin Cryer (C)

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Classifications MeSH