Five-year audit of adherence to an anaesthesia pre-induction checklist.
airway management
anaesthesia
checklist
communication
conduction
patient safety
Journal
Anaesthesia
ISSN: 1365-2044
Titre abrégé: Anaesthesia
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370524
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
07 2022
07 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
19
3
2022
medline:
10
6
2022
entrez:
18
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Although patient safety related to airway management has improved substantially over the last few decades, life-threatening events still occur. Technical skills, clinical expertise and human factors contribute to successful airway management. Checklists aim to improve safety by providing a structured approach to equipment, personnel and decision-making. This audit investigates adherence to our institution's airway checklist from 1 June 2016 to 31 May 2021. Inclusion criteria were procedures requiring airway management and we excluded all procedures performed solely under regional anaesthesia, sedation without airway management or paediatric and cardiovascular surgery. The primary outcome was the proportion of wholly performed pre-induction checklists. Secondary outcomes were the pattern of adherence over the 5 years well as details of airway management, including: airway management difficulties; time and location of induction; anaesthesia teams in operating theatres (including teams for different surgical specialities); non-operating theatre and emergency procedures; type of anaesthesia (general or combined); and urgency of the procedure. In total, 95,946 procedures were included. In 57.3%, anaesthesia pre-induction checklists were completed. Over the 5 years after implementation, adherence improved from 48.3% to 66.7% (p < 0.001). Anticipated and unanticipated airway management difficulties (e.g. facemask ventilation, supraglottic airway device or intubation) defined by the handling anaesthetist were encountered in 4.2% of all procedures. Completion of the checklist differed depending on the time of day (61.3% during the day vs. 35.0% during the night, p < 0.001). Completion also differed depending on location (66.8% in operating theatres vs. 41.0% for non-operating theatre anaesthesia, p < 0.001) and urgency of procedure (65.4% in non-emergencies vs. 35.4% in emergencies, p < 0.001). A mixed-effect model indicated that urgency of procedure is a strong predictor for adherence, with emergency cases having lower adherence (OR 0.58, 95%CI 0.49-0.68, p < 0.001). In conclusion, over 5 years, a significant increase in adherence to an anaesthesia pre-induction checklist was found, and areas for further improvement (e.g. emergencies, non-operating room procedures, night-time procedures) were identified.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35302235
doi: 10.1111/anae.15704
pmc: PMC9314793
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
751-762Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Anaesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Anaesthetists.
Références
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):827-48
pubmed: 26556848
JAMA. 2021 Mar 23;325(12):1164-1172
pubmed: 33755076
Paediatr Anaesth. 2021 Dec;31(12):1271-1275
pubmed: 34478189
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Jul;125(1):e22-e24
pubmed: 32386835
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Jul;24(7):425-7
pubmed: 25972221
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Sep;127(3):470-478
pubmed: 34238547
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 11;29(1):115
pubmed: 34380539
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Oct;37(10):842-846
pubmed: 31860603
Arch Surg. 2009 Dec;144(12):1133-7
pubmed: 20026831
Anaesthesia. 2022 Feb;77(2):185-195
pubmed: 34333761
N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 29;360(5):491-9
pubmed: 19144931
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Jan;64(1):124-130
pubmed: 31436306
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2018 Sep;48(3):225-232
pubmed: 30191910
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct;18(10):965-972
pubmed: 28654550
Crit Care Med. 2021 Feb 1;49(2):250-260
pubmed: 33177363
Anaesthesia. 2020 Jun;75(6):785-799
pubmed: 32221970
Anesth Analg. 2015 Oct;121(4):948-956
pubmed: 25806399
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jul 1;3(7):e209278
pubmed: 32614424
Anesth Analg. 2015 Aug;121(2):570-3
pubmed: 26197378
Emerg Med J. 2018 Sep;35(9):532-537
pubmed: 29794121
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Nov;127(5):798-806
pubmed: 34535275
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2022 Jan 1;39(1):33-41
pubmed: 34397508
Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1419-25, table of contents
pubmed: 15105224
Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31
pubmed: 21447488
Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):31-81
pubmed: 34762729
Br J Anaesth. 2018 Feb;120(2):323-352
pubmed: 29406182
Anesth Analg. 2011 Jul;113(1):84-8
pubmed: 21467561
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014 Jan;58(1):5-18
pubmed: 24116973
J R Soc Interface. 2017 Sep;14(134):
pubmed: 28904005
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Sep;68(9):1373-1404
pubmed: 34143394
Intensive Care Med. 2010 Feb;36(2):248-55
pubmed: 19921148
Anesth Analg. 2021 Feb 1;132(2):395-405
pubmed: 33060492
Anesth Analg. 2018 Jan;126(1):223-232
pubmed: 28763359