Pulmonary Screening Practices of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgeons Across Saudi Arabia in the Posttreatment Surveillance of Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Cross-sectional Survey Study.
lung neoplasms
otolaryngology
radiography
squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck
surgeons
survey
Journal
Interactive journal of medical research
ISSN: 1929-073X
Titre abrégé: Interact J Med Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101598421
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Mar 2022
18 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
25
09
2020
accepted:
31
05
2021
revised:
07
05
2021
entrez:
18
3
2022
pubmed:
19
3
2022
medline:
19
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
With respect to patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), posttreatment surveillance for distant disease has mostly focused on the lungs, as HNSCC distant metastasis occurs in this organ in 90% of HNSCC cases. Additionally, the incidence rate of primary tumors in the lungs is high due to the field cancerization of the entire upper aerodigestive tract. Our cross-sectional survey study aims to evaluate the current beliefs and pulmonary screening practices of otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons across Saudi Arabia with respect to the posttreatment surveillance of HNSCC. This nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted among head and neck surgeon members of the Saudi Society of Otolaryngology from June 1 to June 30, 2020. A predesigned questionnaire was used for data collection, and a descriptive analysis was carried out. This study included 22 participants and had a 78% (22/28) response rate. This study found that the majority of participants (9/22, 41%) used lung radiography for routine lung screening during posttreatment follow-ups, whereas 32% (7/22) used low-dose computed tomography (CT; 7/22, 32%). With regard to the number of years for which participants perform lung screening during follow-ups, the majority of participants (17/22, 77%) reported 5 years, and only 9% (2/22) have performed lifelong lung screening. With regard to the frequency of lung screening, 77% (17/22) of participants conduct screening annually, 18% (4/22) conduct screening half-yearly, and 5% (1/22) conduct screening biennially. With regard to beliefs about the effectiveness of screening procedures in reducing lung cancer mortality rates during follow-ups, 36% (8/22) of participants believed them to be very effective or somewhat effective, 18% (4/22) did not know, and only 9% (2/22) believed that they were not effective. The participants mainly used lung radiography (9/22, 41%), low-dose CT (7/22, 32%), or positron emission tomography/CT (6/22, 27%) as a routine lung screening method during the posttreatment follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer for 5 years (17/22, 77%) or 10 years (3/22, 14%), and only a small percentage of participants have performed lifelong lung screening (2/22, 9%). Lung screening was mostly conducted annually or half-yearly. Such screening was believed to be very effective or somewhat effective.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
With respect to patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), posttreatment surveillance for distant disease has mostly focused on the lungs, as HNSCC distant metastasis occurs in this organ in 90% of HNSCC cases. Additionally, the incidence rate of primary tumors in the lungs is high due to the field cancerization of the entire upper aerodigestive tract.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
Our cross-sectional survey study aims to evaluate the current beliefs and pulmonary screening practices of otolaryngology-head and neck surgeons across Saudi Arabia with respect to the posttreatment surveillance of HNSCC.
METHODS
METHODS
This nationwide cross-sectional survey was conducted among head and neck surgeon members of the Saudi Society of Otolaryngology from June 1 to June 30, 2020. A predesigned questionnaire was used for data collection, and a descriptive analysis was carried out.
RESULTS
RESULTS
This study included 22 participants and had a 78% (22/28) response rate. This study found that the majority of participants (9/22, 41%) used lung radiography for routine lung screening during posttreatment follow-ups, whereas 32% (7/22) used low-dose computed tomography (CT; 7/22, 32%). With regard to the number of years for which participants perform lung screening during follow-ups, the majority of participants (17/22, 77%) reported 5 years, and only 9% (2/22) have performed lifelong lung screening. With regard to the frequency of lung screening, 77% (17/22) of participants conduct screening annually, 18% (4/22) conduct screening half-yearly, and 5% (1/22) conduct screening biennially. With regard to beliefs about the effectiveness of screening procedures in reducing lung cancer mortality rates during follow-ups, 36% (8/22) of participants believed them to be very effective or somewhat effective, 18% (4/22) did not know, and only 9% (2/22) believed that they were not effective.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The participants mainly used lung radiography (9/22, 41%), low-dose CT (7/22, 32%), or positron emission tomography/CT (6/22, 27%) as a routine lung screening method during the posttreatment follow-up of patients with head and neck cancer for 5 years (17/22, 77%) or 10 years (3/22, 14%), and only a small percentage of participants have performed lifelong lung screening (2/22, 9%). Lung screening was mostly conducted annually or half-yearly. Such screening was believed to be very effective or somewhat effective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35302511
pii: v11i1e24592
doi: 10.2196/24592
pmc: PMC8976246
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e24592Informations de copyright
©Majed Alnefaie, Abdullah Alamri, Asalh Saeedi, Awwadh Althobaiti, Shahad Alosaimi, Yousuf Alqurashi, Hani Marzouki, Mazin Merdad. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 18.03.2022.
Références
Head Neck Surg. 1988 Mar-Apr;10(4):225-8
pubmed: 3235352
Semin Oncol. 2017 Oct;44(5):323-329
pubmed: 29580434
Head Neck. 2000 Oct;22(7):680-6
pubmed: 11002323
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008 Aug;6(7):646-95
pubmed: 18691457
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1987 Jul;113(7):762-4
pubmed: 3580159
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2001 Jul-Aug;63(4):202-7
pubmed: 11408812
JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970
pubmed: 33687470
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Dec;267(12):1969-71
pubmed: 20835832
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Sep;122(9):961-6
pubmed: 18177532
Oral Oncol. 2003 Jan;39(1):31-6
pubmed: 12457719
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Feb 04;44:5
pubmed: 25649793
Laryngoscope. 2000 Mar;110(3 Pt 1):397-401
pubmed: 10718426
Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014 Apr;22(2):101-8
pubmed: 24419405
Laryngoscope. 2008 Apr;118(4):671-5
pubmed: 18197136
Laryngoscope. 1980 Feb;90(2):196-201
pubmed: 7354687
Laryngoscope. 2000 Dec;110(12):2033-6
pubmed: 11129015
Head Neck. 2006 Jan;28(1):1-7
pubmed: 16155911
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Feb 1;174(2):269-74
pubmed: 24322569
Radiother Oncol. 2009 Jul;92(1):4-14
pubmed: 19446902
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2001 Jun;27 Suppl A:S1-17
pubmed: 11583107