Biomarker analysis from CheckMate 214: nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma.
gene expression profiling
immunotherapy
inflammation
kidney neoplasms
tumor biomarkers
Journal
Journal for immunotherapy of cancer
ISSN: 2051-1426
Titre abrégé: J Immunother Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101620585
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2022
03 2022
Historique:
accepted:
01
02
2022
entrez:
19
3
2022
pubmed:
20
3
2022
medline:
6
4
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial demonstrated higher response rates and improved overall survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line therapy for advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). An unmet need exists to identify patients with RCC who are most likely to benefit from treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. In exploratory analyses, pretreatment levels of programmed death ligand 1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Genomic and transcriptomic biomarkers (including tumor mutational burden and gene expression signatures) were also investigated. Biomarkers previously associated with benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor-containing regimens in RCC were not predictive for survival in patients with RCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Analysis of gene expression identified an association between an inflammatory response and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. The exploratory analyses reveal relationships between molecular biomarkers and provide supportive data on how the inflammation status of the tumor microenvironment may be important for identifying predictive biomarkers of response and survival with combination immunotherapy in patients with RCC. Further validation may help to provide biomarker-driven precision treatment for patients with RCC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial demonstrated higher response rates and improved overall survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in first-line therapy for advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC). An unmet need exists to identify patients with RCC who are most likely to benefit from treatment with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.
METHODS
In exploratory analyses, pretreatment levels of programmed death ligand 1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry. Genomic and transcriptomic biomarkers (including tumor mutational burden and gene expression signatures) were also investigated.
RESULTS
Biomarkers previously associated with benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor-containing regimens in RCC were not predictive for survival in patients with RCC treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Analysis of gene expression identified an association between an inflammatory response and progression-free survival with nivolumab plus ipilimumab.
CONCLUSIONS
The exploratory analyses reveal relationships between molecular biomarkers and provide supportive data on how the inflammation status of the tumor microenvironment may be important for identifying predictive biomarkers of response and survival with combination immunotherapy in patients with RCC. Further validation may help to provide biomarker-driven precision treatment for patients with RCC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35304405
pii: jitc-2021-004316
doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004316
pmc: PMC8935174
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Ipilimumab
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Sunitinib
V99T50803M
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA008748
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: RJM reports consulting fees from Aveo, Calithera, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Merck, Novartis AG, Pfizer, and Roche, and contracted research to employer MSKCC for Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Genentech, Merck, Pfizer, and Roche. TC reports personal and institutional research undertaken for Alexion, Analysis Group, AstraZeneca, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/ER Squibb & Sons LLC, Calithera, Cerulean, Corvus, Eisai, Exelixis, F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Foundation Medicine, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, Prometheus Labs, Roche, Roche Products Limited, Sanofi/Aventis, Takeda, and Tracon; consulting/honoraria or advisory roles from Alexion, Analysis Group, AstraZeneca, Aveo, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb/ER Squibb & Sons LLC, Cerulean, Corvus, Eisai, EMD Serono, Exelixis, Foundation Medicine Inc, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Heron Therapeutics, Infinity Pharma, Ipsen, Jansen Oncology, IQVIA, Lilly, Merck, NCCN, NiKang, Novartis, Peloton, Pfizer, Pionyr, Prometheus Labs, Roche, Sanofi/Aventis, Surface Oncology, Tempest, and Up-to-Date; travel, accommodations, expenses, and medical writing in relation to consulting, advisory roles, or honoraria; participation in CME-related events by OncLive, PVI, MJH Life Sciences, and in the NCI GU steering committee; owning Pionyr and Tempest stock; and patents filed, royalties, and other intellectual properties related to biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors and ctDNA. TC is also supported in part by the Dana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center Kidney SPORE and Program, the Kohlberg Chair at Harvard Medical School and the Trust Family, Michael Brigham, and Loker Pinard Funds for Kidney Cancer Research at DFCI. DM reports honoraria from Alkermes, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calithera Biosciences, Eisai, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Iovance, Merck, Pfizer, and Werewolf Therapeutics; and research support from Alkermes Inc, Bristol Myers Squibb, Exelixis, Genentech, Merck, Pfizer, and X4 Pharma. TP reports honoraria for advisory/research boards from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Incyte, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seattle Genetics; institutional grants and funding from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eisai, Exelixis, Ipsen, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Merck Serono, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Seattle Genetics; and fees for travel and accommodation expenses from AstraZeneca, Ipsen, MSD, Roche, and Pfizer. YV reports no conflicts of interest. SG is employed by, and owns stock in, Bristol Myers Squibb. JY is employed by, and owns stock in, Bristol Myers Squibb. CH is employed by Bristol Myers Squibb. RA is employed by, and owns stock in, Bristol Myers Squibb. SP-C is employed by, and a shareholder of, Bristol Myers Squibb. SSS is employed by, and owns stock in, Bristol Myers Squibb. MBM is currently employed by BeiGene and owns stock in Bristol Myers Squibb. MW-R is currently employed by Agios Pharmaceuticals and owns stock in Agios Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb. MBM, MW-R, and PR-M were employees of Bristol Myers Squibb at the time this work was conducted.
Références
Br J Cancer. 2018 May;118(9):1238-1242
pubmed: 29674707
Int J Oncol. 2016 Oct;49(4):1360-8
pubmed: 27499357
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Jul 1;21(13):3031-40
pubmed: 25688160
J Immunother Cancer. 2017 Feb 21;5:18
pubmed: 28239471
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Dec;18(6):469-476.e4
pubmed: 32641261
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jul 15;27(14):3926-3935
pubmed: 33782030
Cell Syst. 2015 Dec 23;1(6):417-425
pubmed: 26771021
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):909-918
pubmed: 32472114
Nature. 2013 Aug 22;500(7463):415-21
pubmed: 23945592
Science. 2018 Feb 2;359(6375):582-587
pubmed: 29217585
Mol Diagn Ther. 2019 Aug;23(4):507-520
pubmed: 31250328
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Mar 1;113(3):234-243
pubmed: 32359162
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):78-86
pubmed: 32873572
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Mar;9(3):
pubmed: 33658305
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 4;384(9):829-841
pubmed: 33657295
J Cancer. 2019 Oct 21;10(26):6599-6607
pubmed: 31777589
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13
pubmed: 26406148
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Jun 22;6(1):63
pubmed: 29929551
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Oct;14(10):1807-1817
pubmed: 31238177
ESMO Open. 2020 Nov;5(6):e001079
pubmed: 33246931
Science. 2018 Feb 16;359(6377):801-806
pubmed: 29301960
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2021 Feb;70(2):265-273
pubmed: 32757054
Exp Mol Med. 2018 Dec 13;50(12):1-11
pubmed: 30546008
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Jul;8(2):
pubmed: 32661118
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Sep 6;2021:5790416
pubmed: 34531966
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Apr 20;37(12):992-1000
pubmed: 30785829
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1116-1127
pubmed: 30779529
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Nov 15;22(22):5461-5471
pubmed: 27169994
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 05;378(14):1277-1290
pubmed: 29562145
Cancer Cell. 2020 Dec 14;38(6):803-817.e4
pubmed: 33157048
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr;15(4):234-248
pubmed: 29405201
Mol Cancer Ther. 2015 Apr;14(4):847-56
pubmed: 25695955
Genome Biol. 2016 Oct 20;17(1):218
pubmed: 27765066
Science. 2018 Oct 12;362(6411):
pubmed: 30309915
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Oct 25;102(43):15545-50
pubmed: 16199517
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1009-1021
pubmed: 28694034
Nat Commun. 2017 Jun 08;8:15770
pubmed: 28593993
ESMO Open. 2017 May 9;2(2):e000185
pubmed: 28761748
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 2;373(1):23-34
pubmed: 26027431
Nat Med. 2020 Nov;26(11):1733-1741
pubmed: 32895571
Nat Methods. 2018 Aug;15(8):591-594
pubmed: 30013048
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 26;376(4):354-366
pubmed: 28121507
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 09;11(9):e0161779
pubmed: 27610613
Nat Med. 2018 Jun;24(6):749-757
pubmed: 29867230
Nat Genet. 2014 Mar;46(3):225-233
pubmed: 24487277
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 5;12(1):808
pubmed: 33547292
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 27;7(1):16424
pubmed: 29180625