Ejaculatory Function Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer.


Journal

The journal of sexual medicine
ISSN: 1743-6109
Titre abrégé: J Sex Med
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101230693

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
05 2022
Historique:
received: 26 09 2021
revised: 13 02 2022
accepted: 15 02 2022
pubmed: 21 3 2022
medline: 6 5 2022
entrez: 20 3 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Ejaculatory dysfunction is an important male quality of life issue which has not yet been studied in the setting of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The purpose of this study is to evaluate ejaculatory function following SBRT for prostate cancer. Two hundred and thirty-one patients on a prospective quality of life study with baseline ejaculatory capacity treated with prostate SBRT from 2013 to 2019 were included in this analysis. Ejaculation was assessed via the Ejaculation Scale (ES-8) from the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire. Patients completed the questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post-SBRT. Elderly patients (Age > 70) and those who received hormonal therapy were excluded from analysis. Patients were treated to 35-36.25 Gy in 5 fractions delivered with the CyberKnife Radiosurgical System (Accuray). Ejaculatory function was assessed by ES-8 scores (range 4-40) with lower values representing increased interference or annoyance. Median age at the time of treatment was 65 years. Median follow up was 24 months (IQR 19-24.5 months). 64.5% of patients had ED at baseline (SHIM < 22). The 2-year anejaculation rate was 15%. Mean composite ES-8 scores showed a decline in the first month following treatment then stabilized: 30.4 (start of treatment); 26.5 (1 month); 27.6 (3 month); 27.0 (6 month); 26.2 (9 month); 25.4 (12 month); 25.0 (18 month) and 25.4 (24 month). White race, higher pre-treatment SHIM (≥22), and higher ES-8 (≥31) at treatment start were significantly associated with a decreased probability of a clinically significant decline. Patient-reported ejaculate volume was significantly reduced at all time points post-SBRT. Ejaculatory discomfort peaked at 1 month and 9 months post-SBRT. Prior to treatment, 8.0% of men reported that they were very to extremely bothered by their ejaculatory dysfunction. The number of patients reporting this concern increased to 14.4% at one year and dropped to 11% at 24-months post-SBRT. Patients undergoing prostate SBRT may experience meaningful changes in ejaculatory function and should be counseled on the trajectory of these side effects. This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Subjective questionnaire responses captured limited aspects of ejaculatory function in this cohort. The high incidence of moderate to extreme bother in ejaculatory function before and after SBRT suggests a need for novel approaches to improving ejaculation. Sholklapper T, Creswell M, Cantalino J, et al. Ejaculatory Function Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. J Sex Med 2022;19:771-780.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Ejaculatory dysfunction is an important male quality of life issue which has not yet been studied in the setting of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
AIM
The purpose of this study is to evaluate ejaculatory function following SBRT for prostate cancer.
METHODS
Two hundred and thirty-one patients on a prospective quality of life study with baseline ejaculatory capacity treated with prostate SBRT from 2013 to 2019 were included in this analysis. Ejaculation was assessed via the Ejaculation Scale (ES-8) from the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire. Patients completed the questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post-SBRT. Elderly patients (Age > 70) and those who received hormonal therapy were excluded from analysis. Patients were treated to 35-36.25 Gy in 5 fractions delivered with the CyberKnife Radiosurgical System (Accuray).
OUTCOMES
Ejaculatory function was assessed by ES-8 scores (range 4-40) with lower values representing increased interference or annoyance.
RESULTS
Median age at the time of treatment was 65 years. Median follow up was 24 months (IQR 19-24.5 months). 64.5% of patients had ED at baseline (SHIM < 22). The 2-year anejaculation rate was 15%. Mean composite ES-8 scores showed a decline in the first month following treatment then stabilized: 30.4 (start of treatment); 26.5 (1 month); 27.6 (3 month); 27.0 (6 month); 26.2 (9 month); 25.4 (12 month); 25.0 (18 month) and 25.4 (24 month). White race, higher pre-treatment SHIM (≥22), and higher ES-8 (≥31) at treatment start were significantly associated with a decreased probability of a clinically significant decline. Patient-reported ejaculate volume was significantly reduced at all time points post-SBRT. Ejaculatory discomfort peaked at 1 month and 9 months post-SBRT. Prior to treatment, 8.0% of men reported that they were very to extremely bothered by their ejaculatory dysfunction. The number of patients reporting this concern increased to 14.4% at one year and dropped to 11% at 24-months post-SBRT.
CLINICAL TRANSLATION
Patients undergoing prostate SBRT may experience meaningful changes in ejaculatory function and should be counseled on the trajectory of these side effects.
STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS
This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Subjective questionnaire responses captured limited aspects of ejaculatory function in this cohort.
CONCLUSION
The high incidence of moderate to extreme bother in ejaculatory function before and after SBRT suggests a need for novel approaches to improving ejaculation. Sholklapper T, Creswell M, Cantalino J, et al. Ejaculatory Function Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. J Sex Med 2022;19:771-780.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35305936
pii: S1743-6095(22)00595-1
doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.02.018
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

771-780

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Tamir Sholklapper (T)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Michael Creswell (M)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Jonathan Cantalino (J)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Michael Markel (M)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Alan Zwart (A)

Julius L. Chambers Biomedical Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, USA.

Malika Danner (M)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Marilyn Ayoob (M)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Thomas Yung (T)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Brian Collins (B)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Deepak Kumar (D)

Julius L. Chambers Biomedical Biotechnology Research Institute, North Carolina Central University, Durham, NC, USA.

Nima Aghdam (N)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess, Boston, MA, USA.

Rachel S Rubin (RS)

Department of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Ryan Hankins (R)

Department of Urology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Simeng Suy (S)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

Sean Collins (S)

Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: sean.p.collins@gunet.georgetown.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH