Genetically Determined Reproductive Aging and Coronary Heart Disease: A Bidirectional 2-sample Mendelian Randomization.
Mendelian Randomization
coronary heart disease
reproductive aging
risk factors
Journal
The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism
ISSN: 1945-7197
Titre abrégé: J Clin Endocrinol Metab
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375362
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 06 2022
16 06 2022
Historique:
received:
22
05
2021
pubmed:
21
3
2022
medline:
22
6
2022
entrez:
20
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Accelerated reproductive aging, in women indicated by early natural menopause, is associated with increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in observational studies. Conversely, an adverse CHD risk profile has been suggested to accelerate menopause. To study the direction and evidence for causality of the relationship between reproductive aging and (non-)fatal CHD and CHD risk factors in a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, using age at natural menopause (ANM) genetic variants as a measure for genetically determined reproductive aging in women. We also studied the association of these variants with CHD risk (factors) in men. Two-sample MR, using both cohort data as well as summary statistics, with 4 methods: simple and weighted median-based, standard inverse-variance weighted (IVW) regression, and MR-Egger regression. Data from EPIC-CVD and summary statistics from UK Biobank and publicly available genome-wide association studies were pooled for the different analyses. CHD, CHD risk factors, and ANM. Across different methods of MR, no association was found between genetically determined reproductive aging and CHD risk in women (relative risk estimateIVW = 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-1.01), or any of the CHD risk factors. Similarly, no associations were found in men. Neither did the reversed analyses show evidence for an association between CHD (risk factors) and reproductive aging. Genetically determined reproductive aging is not causally associated with CHD risk (factors) in women, nor were the genetic variants associated in men. We found no evidence for a reverse association in a combined sample of women and men.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Accelerated reproductive aging, in women indicated by early natural menopause, is associated with increased coronary heart disease (CHD) risk in observational studies. Conversely, an adverse CHD risk profile has been suggested to accelerate menopause.
OBJECTIVES
To study the direction and evidence for causality of the relationship between reproductive aging and (non-)fatal CHD and CHD risk factors in a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) approach, using age at natural menopause (ANM) genetic variants as a measure for genetically determined reproductive aging in women. We also studied the association of these variants with CHD risk (factors) in men.
DESIGN
Two-sample MR, using both cohort data as well as summary statistics, with 4 methods: simple and weighted median-based, standard inverse-variance weighted (IVW) regression, and MR-Egger regression.
PARTICIPANTS
Data from EPIC-CVD and summary statistics from UK Biobank and publicly available genome-wide association studies were pooled for the different analyses.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES
CHD, CHD risk factors, and ANM.
RESULTS
Across different methods of MR, no association was found between genetically determined reproductive aging and CHD risk in women (relative risk estimateIVW = 0.99; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.97-1.01), or any of the CHD risk factors. Similarly, no associations were found in men. Neither did the reversed analyses show evidence for an association between CHD (risk factors) and reproductive aging.
CONCLUSION
Genetically determined reproductive aging is not causally associated with CHD risk (factors) in women, nor were the genetic variants associated in men. We found no evidence for a reverse association in a combined sample of women and men.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35306566
pii: 6550950
doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgac171
pmc: PMC9202700
mid: EMS144700
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2952-e2961Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17228
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/P014550/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : European Union Framework 7
ID : HEALTH-F2-2012-279233
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : SP/09/002
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : European Research Council
ID : 268834
Pays : International
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : RG13/13/30194
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
ID : RG/08/014
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Regional Governments of Andalucía, Asturias, Basque Country, Murcia and Navarra, ISCIII RETIC
ID : RD06/0020
Organisme : Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit
ID : MC_UU_12015/1
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_QA137853
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : UK Medical Research Council Skills Development Fellowship
ID : MR/P014550/1
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UU_00006/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L003120/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Sixth Framework Programme
ID : LSHM_CT_2006_037197
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
Organisme : World Cancer Research Fund
ID : ERC-2009-AdG 232997
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : G0800270
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Royal Society
ID : 204623/Z/16/Z
Organisme : Dutch Heart Foundation
ID : 2013T083
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society.
Références
Genet Epidemiol. 2016 May;40(4):304-14
pubmed: 27061298
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Nov;4(11):e553-e564
pubmed: 31588031
Epidemiology. 2005 Jul;16(4):556-62
pubmed: 15951675
Int J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb;32(1):1-22
pubmed: 12689998
Nat Genet. 2013 Nov;45(11):1274-1283
pubmed: 24097068
Epidemiology. 2014 May;25(3):427-35
pubmed: 24681576
Hum Reprod. 2016 Dec;31(12):2856-2864
pubmed: 27798047
Lancet. 1996 Mar 16;347(9003):714-8
pubmed: 8602000
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Jan;23(2):178-86
pubmed: 25331207
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 May 16;47(10):1976-83
pubmed: 16697313
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Feb 4;98(2):392-3
pubmed: 26849114
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779
pubmed: 25826379
Eur J Epidemiol. 2017 May;32(5):391-392
pubmed: 28664250
Climacteric. 2016;19(1):27-36
pubmed: 26576012
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jan 22;51(3):264-70
pubmed: 18206734
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Apr;103(4):965-78
pubmed: 26961927
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;1(7):767-776
pubmed: 27627190
Hum Mol Genet. 2013 Apr 1;22(7):1465-72
pubmed: 23307926
Eur Heart J. 2018 Feb 14;39(7):508-579
pubmed: 29190377
Elife. 2019 Mar 05;8:
pubmed: 30835202
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(1):98-106
pubmed: 33203707
Circulation. 2017 Jun 13;135(24):2373-2388
pubmed: 28500271
Diabetes. 2010 Dec;59(12):3229-39
pubmed: 20858683
BMJ. 2018 Jul 12;362:k601
pubmed: 30002074
Int J Epidemiol. 2019 Aug 1;48(4):1275-1285
pubmed: 30796459
BMC Med. 2017 Jan 4;15(1):2
pubmed: 28049531
Nat Genet. 2010 Feb;42(2):105-16
pubmed: 20081858
Genet Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;40(7):597-608
pubmed: 27625185
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Dec 1;46(6):1734-1739
pubmed: 28398548
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Dec 15;54(25):2366-73
pubmed: 20082925
Bioinformatics. 2016 Oct 15;32(20):3207-3209
pubmed: 27318201
Nat Genet. 2015 Oct;47(10):1121-1130
pubmed: 26343387
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Mar;34(3):235-246
pubmed: 30721378
Eur J Epidemiol. 2007;22(2):129-41
pubmed: 17295097
Nat Genet. 2015 Nov;47(11):1294-1303
pubmed: 26414677
Nature. 2011 Sep 11;478(7367):103-9
pubmed: 21909115
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 19;59(25):2356-65
pubmed: 22698489
Lancet. 2012 Mar 31;379(9822):1173-4
pubmed: 22463865
Nature. 2015 Feb 12;518(7538):197-206
pubmed: 25673413
Menopause. 2018 Apr;25(4):451-457
pubmed: 29112599