Adverse skin reactions to personal protective equipment during COVID-19 pandemic in Italian health care workers.
COVID-19
dermatology
personal protective equipment
Journal
Dermatologic therapy
ISSN: 1529-8019
Titre abrégé: Dermatol Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9700070
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2022
06 2022
Historique:
revised:
07
02
2022
received:
01
12
2021
accepted:
17
03
2022
pubmed:
21
3
2022
medline:
9
6
2022
entrez:
20
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To avoid exposure to SARS-COV-2, healthcare professionals must use personal protective equipment (PPE). Their use has been related to a series of adverse effects; the most frequent adverse events were headache, dyspnoea, and pressure injuries. Skin adverse effects are very common, including contact dermatitis, itching, erythema, and acneiform eruptions. The objective of this study is to evaluate the skin problems caused by personal protection equipment (PPE) in health care workers (HCWs) and to individuate eventual risk factors. From May to June 2020 a retrospective observational multi-centric study conducted by an online survey sent by email, involving 10 hospital centers, was performed. We considered as independent variables gender and age, occupational group and sector, time of utilization, type and material of PPE. We tested 3 types of PPE: gloves, bonnet, and mask for different time of utilization (<1, 1-3, 3-6, >6 h). We performed a multiple logistic regression model to correlate them with skin adverse events occurrence. Among all the 1184 participants, 292 workers reported a dermatological pathology: 45 (15.41%) had psoriasis, 54 (18.49%) eczema, 38 (13.01%) acne, 48 (16.44%) seborrheic dermatitis, and 107 (36.64%) other. In our sample previous inflammatory dermatological conditions, female sex, prolonged use of PPE were significant risk factors for developing skin related adverse events considering all the PPE considered. The use of PPE is still mandatory in the hospital setting and skin adverse reactions still represent a global problem. Although data from Europe are limited, our study highlighted the importance of the problem of PPE skin reactions in a large sample of Italian healthcare professionals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35306721
doi: 10.1111/dth.15460
pmc: PMC9111857
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e15460Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Dermatologic Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Références
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 24;9:815415
pubmed: 35141194
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Aug;34(8):1626-1632
pubmed: 32426855
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jul;34(7):e297-e298
pubmed: 32302444
Pers Individ Dif. 2021 Feb 15;170:110417
pubmed: 33052155
J Med Virol. 2020 Nov;92(11):2332-2334
pubmed: 32410241
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Jul;183(1):190-192
pubmed: 32255197
Contact Dermatitis. 2006 Nov;55(5):291-4
pubmed: 17026695
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Jun;35(6):e15460
pubmed: 35306721
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jun 12;99(24):e20603
pubmed: 32541493
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Oct;34(10):e563-e566
pubmed: 32495393
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Mar;34(2):e14823
pubmed: 33527560
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14346
pubmed: 32985745
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2020 Oct 12;20(12):75
pubmed: 33047260
J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Oct;19(10):2464-2465
pubmed: 32790897
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240785
pubmed: 33057375
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Oct;35(10):1994-2006
pubmed: 34077565
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021 Jan;46(1):142-144
pubmed: 32705718