Biocompatibility of Amalgam vs Composite - A Review.
bisphenol-A
child
lactation
mercury
pregnancy
Journal
Oral health & preventive dentistry
ISSN: 1757-9996
Titre abrégé: Oral Health Prev Dent
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101167768
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Mar 2022
14 Mar 2022
Historique:
entrez:
21
3
2022
pubmed:
22
3
2022
medline:
23
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Minamata Convention resulted in restrictions in the use of amalgam in daily dental practice. This opens up new discussions about the biocompatibility of amalgam, but also of composites as alternative materials. In the following review article, these issues will be discussed in more detail to provide dentists with a knowledge base for themselves and for communication with their patients. In addition to mercury in amalgam or monomers in composites, bisphenol A and nanoparticles generated during the grinding, polishing or removal of restorations must also be included in the biocompatibility evaluation. In laboratory tests, these substances cause toxic reactions, and bisphenol A also exhibits estrogen-like effects. However, it must be taken into account that the concentrations used in laboratory tests are much higher than in clinical practice. Thus, both amalgam and composite can be used in the general population. Nevertheless, for scientifically, politically and legally defined risk groups (e.g. dental personnel, allergic persons, pregnant or lactating women, children under 15 years of age, people with certain systemic diseases), indication restrictions and precautionary measures must be observed. The well-known amalgam discussion has taught us the importance of thorough and open risk communication with the patient.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35308016
pii: 2831749
doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.b2831749
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzhydryl Compounds
0
Biocompatible Materials
0
Phenols
0
Dental Amalgam
8049-85-2
Mercury
FXS1BY2PGL
bisphenol A
MLT3645I99
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM