Fracture resistance of polyetheretherketone, Ni-Cr, and fiberglass postcore systems: An
Bicuspid
Fiberglass
Polyetheretherketone
post and core technique
Journal
Dental research journal
ISSN: 1735-3327
Titre abrégé: Dent Res J (Isfahan)
Pays: Iran
ID NLM: 101471186
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
10
08
2020
revised:
02
08
2021
accepted:
14
09
2021
entrez:
21
3
2022
pubmed:
22
3
2022
medline:
22
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
It is unclear which the material is a better choice for post and core rehabilitation systems in endodontically treated teeth. This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of three different postcore systems. In this The fracture resistance was significantly higher in Group B (Ni-Cr) than in Group C (PEEK) ( The present study showed that the fracture resistance was significantly higher in the Ni-Cr post than in the fiberglass and PEEK posts. Further, the fracture mode was more repairable in teeth restored with the PEEK post, as compared to the other posts.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
It is unclear which the material is a better choice for post and core rehabilitation systems in endodontically treated teeth. This study aimed to compare the fracture resistance of three different postcore systems.
Materials and Methods
UNASSIGNED
In this
Results
UNASSIGNED
The fracture resistance was significantly higher in Group B (Ni-Cr) than in Group C (PEEK) (
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
The present study showed that the fracture resistance was significantly higher in the Ni-Cr post than in the fiberglass and PEEK posts. Further, the fracture mode was more repairable in teeth restored with the PEEK post, as compared to the other posts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35308441
doi: 10.4103/1735-3327.338783
pii: DRJ-19-20
pmc: PMC8927960
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
20Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2022 Dental Research Journal.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors of this manuscript declare that they have no conflicts of interest, real or perceived, financial or nonfinancial in this article.
Références
J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Jan;60(1):12-9
pubmed: 26520679
J Dent. 2006 May;34(5):326-35
pubmed: 16202498
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):666-73
pubmed: 26344191
Oper Dent. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):47-54
pubmed: 16536193
J Prosthet Dent. 2001 Jul;86(1):74-80
pubmed: 11458265
J Clin Med. 2019 Feb 12;8(2):
pubmed: 30759863
Materials (Basel). 2016 Nov 08;9(11):
pubmed: 28774027
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2012 May;100(4):1044-52
pubmed: 22331553
J Clin Exp Dent. 2013 Jul 01;5(3):e150-3
pubmed: 24455071
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Apr;87(4):431-7
pubmed: 12011860
J Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Spring;11(2):153-159
pubmed: 32273956
J Adv Prosthodont. 2017 Jun;9(3):170-175
pubmed: 28680547
Restor Dent Endod. 2015 Aug;40(3):229-35
pubmed: 26295027
Eur J Dent. 2017 Jan-Mar;11(1):122-125
pubmed: 28435378
Materials (Basel). 2018 May 29;11(6):
pubmed: 29844270
J Endod. 2013 Jan;39(1):11-5
pubmed: 23228250
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2017 Dec 01;25(4):201-208
pubmed: 29182213
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1373127
pubmed: 28386547
Stomatologija. 2017;19(1):19-23
pubmed: 29243680
Indian J Dent Res. 2014 Jan-Feb;25(1):58-63
pubmed: 24748301
Dent Mater J. 2010 May;29(3):233-45
pubmed: 20467158
J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Sep;114(3):390-7
pubmed: 26047799
Int J Prosthodont. 2004 Jul-Aug;17(4):476-82
pubmed: 15382786