Different Neural Responses for Unfinished Sentence as a Conventional Indirect Refusal Between Native and Non-native Speakers: An Event-Related Potential Study.

EPN N400 P200 P300 P600 conventional indirect refusal mentalization unfinished Japanese sentences

Journal

Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 31 10 2021
accepted: 24 01 2022
entrez: 21 3 2022
pubmed: 22 3 2022
medline: 22 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Refusal is considered a face-threatening act (FTA), since it contradicts the inviter's expectations. In the case of Japanese, native speakers (NS) are known to prefer to leave sentences unfinished for a conventional indirect refusal. Successful comprehension of this indirect refusal depends on whether the addressee is fully conventionalized to the preference for syntactic unfinishedness so that they can identify the true intention of the refusal. Then, non-native speakers (NNS) who are not fully accustomed to the convention may be confused by the indirect style. In the present study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) of electroencephalography in an attempt to differentiate the neural substrates for perceiving unfinished sentences in a conventionalized indirect refusal as an FTA between NS and NNS, in terms of the unfinishedness and indirectness of the critical sentence. In addition, we examined the effects of individual differences in mentalization, or the theory of mind, which refers to the ability to infer the mental states of others. We found several different ERP effects for these refusals between NS and NNS. NNS induced stronger P600 effects for the unfinishedness of the refusal sentences, suggesting their perceived syntactic anomaly. This was not evoked in NS. NNS also revealed the effects of N400 and P300 for the indirectness of refusal sentences, which can be interpreted as their increased processing load for pragmatic processing in the inexperienced contextual flow. We further found that the NNS's individual mentalizing ability correlates with the effect of N400 mentioned above, indicating that lower mentalizers evoke higher N400 for indirect refusal. NS, on the contrary, did not yield these effects reflecting the increased pragmatic processing load. Instead, they evoked earlier ERPs of early posterior negativity (EPN) and P200, both of which are known as indices of emotional processing, for finished sentences of refusal than for unfinished ones. We interpreted these effects as a NS's dispreference for finished sentences to realize an FTA, given that unfinished sentences are considered more polite and more conventionalized in Japanese social encounters. Overall, these findings provide evidence that a syntactic anomaly inherent in a cultural convention as well as individual mentalizing ability plays an important role in understanding an indirect speech act of face-threatening refusal.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35310221
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806023
pmc: PMC8929272
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

806023

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 Wang, Tokimoto, Song, Ueno, Koizumi and Kiyama.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Références

Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Nov 01;7:712
pubmed: 24198773
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Nov;70(11):2200-2218
pubmed: 27557566
Brain Lang. 1996 Dec;55(3):293-316
pubmed: 8954602
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2014 Dec;85(5):474-81
pubmed: 25639030
Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Mar;110(3):463-8
pubmed: 10363770
J Mem Lang. 2010 Oct 1;63(3):324-346
pubmed: 20936088
Lang Speech. 2021 Sep;64(3):594-624
pubmed: 32715872
Cereb Cortex. 2014 Oct;24(10):2572-8
pubmed: 23645715
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011 Mar;261(2):111-20
pubmed: 20661744
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2001 Aug;25(6):465-76
pubmed: 11595268
Int J Psychophysiol. 2019 Jun;140:33-40
pubmed: 30910645
Curr Opin Neurol. 2013 Apr;26(2):146-53
pubmed: 23406909
J Autism Dev Disord. 1988 Sep;18(3):379-402
pubmed: 3049519
Emotion. 2010 Dec;10(6):863-73
pubmed: 21171758
Brain Lang. 2008 Mar;104(3):262-9
pubmed: 17428529
J Psycholinguist Res. 2016 Jun;45(3):475-505
pubmed: 25794495
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2009 Mar;9(1):28-43
pubmed: 19246325
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 25;5:1072
pubmed: 25309492
J Autism Dev Disord. 2006 Feb;36(2):263-70
pubmed: 16586157
J Neurosci Methods. 2015 Jul 30;250:47-63
pubmed: 25791012
Biol Psychol. 2013 Mar;92(3):464-79
pubmed: 23059636
Int J Psychophysiol. 1997 Feb;25(2):169-76
pubmed: 9101341
Brain Res. 2012 Mar 29;1446:127-43
pubmed: 22361114
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Mar 28;7:86
pubmed: 23543248
Brain Lang. 2017 Aug;171:52-61
pubmed: 28527316
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0120068
pubmed: 25793289
J Autism Dev Disord. 2015 Nov;45(11):3606-12
pubmed: 26093391
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:130714
pubmed: 21687590
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 21;4:345
pubmed: 23801973
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015 Nov;62(11):2553-67
pubmed: 26415149
Soc Neurosci. 2018 Aug;13(4):495-510
pubmed: 28712338
J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Nov;24(11):2237-47
pubmed: 22849399
J Cogn Neurosci. 2010 Aug;22(8):1870-87
pubmed: 19580390
Biol Psychiatry. 1991 Mar 1;29(5):467-80
pubmed: 2018820
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997 Oct;38(7):813-22
pubmed: 9363580
Psychophysiology. 1993 Sep;30(5):518-24
pubmed: 8416078
Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2914-26
pubmed: 23498655
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 29;9:1574
pubmed: 30210402
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Nov;49(13):3542-50
pubmed: 21930137
Cogn Sci. 2017 Jan;41(1):137-157
pubmed: 26913833
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2015 Aug;10(8):1021-9
pubmed: 25556210
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jul;26(7):1428-44
pubmed: 24666127
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 13;10:2744
pubmed: 31920802
J Neurosci Methods. 2004 Mar 15;134(1):9-21
pubmed: 15102499

Auteurs

Min Wang (M)

Department of Linguistics, Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Shingo Tokimoto (S)

Department of English Language Studies, Mejiro University, Tokyo, Japan.

Ge Song (G)

Department of Linguistics, Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Takashi Ueno (T)

Department of Social Welfare, Faculty of Comprehensive Welfare, Tohoku Fukushi University, Sendai, Japan.

Masatoshi Koizumi (M)

Department of Linguistics, Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Sachiko Kiyama (S)

Department of Linguistics, Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

Classifications MeSH