Difficulties Experienced by Older Listeners in Utilizing Voice Cues for Speaker Discrimination.
formant frequencies
fundamental frequency
older adults
speaker discrimination
voice discrimination
Journal
Frontiers in psychology
ISSN: 1664-1078
Titre abrégé: Front Psychol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101550902
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
18
10
2021
accepted:
24
01
2022
entrez:
21
3
2022
pubmed:
22
3
2022
medline:
22
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Human listeners are assumed to apply different strategies to improve speech recognition in background noise. Young listeners with normal hearing (NH), e.g., have been shown to follow the voice of a particular speaker based on the fundamental (F0) and formant frequencies, which are both influenced by the gender, age, and size of the speaker. However, the auditory and cognitive processes that underlie the extraction and discrimination of these voice cues across speakers may be subject to age-related decline. The present study aimed to examine the utilization of F0 and formant cues for voice discrimination (VD) in older adults with hearing expected for their age. Difference limens (DLs) for VD were estimated in 15 healthy older adults (65-78 years old) and 35 young adults (18-35 years old) using only F0 cues, only formant frequency cues, and a combination of F0 + formant frequencies. A three-alternative forced-choice paradigm with an adaptive-tracking threshold-seeking procedure was used. Wechsler backward digit span test was used as a measure of auditory working memory. Trail Making Test (TMT) was used to provide cognitive information reflecting a combined effect of processing speed, mental flexibility, and executive control abilities. The results showed that (a) the mean VD thresholds of the older adults were poorer than those of the young adults for all voice cues, although larger variability was observed among the older listeners; (b) both age groups found the formant cues more beneficial for VD, compared to the F0 cues, and the combined (F0 + formant) cues resulted in better thresholds, compared to each cue separately; (c) significant associations were found for the older adults in the combined F0 + formant condition between VD and TMT scores, and between VD and hearing sensitivity, supporting the notion that a decline with age in both top-down and bottom-up mechanisms may hamper the ability of older adults to discriminate between voices. The present findings suggest that older listeners may have difficulty following the voice of a specific speaker and thus implementing doing so as a strategy for listening amid noise. This may contribute to understanding their reported difficulty listening in adverse conditions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35310278
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.797422
pmc: PMC8928022
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
797422Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Zaltz and Kishon-Rabin.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Nov;114(5):2913-22
pubmed: 14650025
Ear Hear. 2011 Feb;32(1):75-83
pubmed: 20739892
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009 May;15(3):438-50
pubmed: 19402930
J Acoust Soc Am. 2001 Mar;109(3):1101-9
pubmed: 11303924
J Acoust Soc Am. 1971 Feb;49(2):Suppl 2:467+
pubmed: 5541744
J Am Acad Audiol. 2012 Sep;23(8):635-66
pubmed: 22967738
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Aug;130(2):1006-19
pubmed: 21877813
Int J Audiol. 2005 Apr;44(4):213-30
pubmed: 16011050
J Acoust Soc Am. 2009 Feb;125(2):1114-24
pubmed: 19206886
J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 Sep;106(3 Pt 1):1511-22
pubmed: 10489707
J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98
pubmed: 1202204
Phonetica. 2008;65(4):210-30
pubmed: 19221452
Age Ageing. 2012 Mar;41(2):195-200
pubmed: 22130560
Hear Res. 2021 Apr;403:108188
pubmed: 33581668
Am J Audiol. 2012 Dec;21(2):344-50
pubmed: 23233520
Hear Res. 2008 Aug;242(1-2):132-40
pubmed: 18249077
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Mar;139(3):EL51-6
pubmed: 27036287
Trends Amplif. 2008 Dec;12(4):316-31
pubmed: 18974203
Int J Audiol. 2003 Jul;42 Suppl 2:2S17-20
pubmed: 12918624
Audiol Res. 2011 Mar 07;1(1):e10
pubmed: 26557294
Trends Amplif. 2006 Mar;10(1):29-59
pubmed: 16528429
Psychol Aging. 2000 Sep;15(3):527-41
pubmed: 11014715
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Dec;122(6):3628-39
pubmed: 18247770
J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Nov;118(5):3177-86
pubmed: 16334696
Hear Res. 2008 Jan;235(1-2):143-56
pubmed: 18093766
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277-81
pubmed: 17406468
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Jul;114(1):368-79
pubmed: 12880048
J Acoust Soc Am. 1988 Mar;83(3):859-95
pubmed: 3281988
Science. 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):494
pubmed: 25635081
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 15;10(7):e0132193
pubmed: 26177102
Ear Hear. 2018 Mar/Apr;39(2):226-237
pubmed: 28799983
Int J Audiol. 2011 Dec;50(12):887-96
pubmed: 21929374
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Sep;138(3):1687-95
pubmed: 26428806
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Jan;46(1):10-20
pubmed: 31436452
J Acoust Soc Am. 2018 Feb;143(2):1085
pubmed: 29495693
Biol Psychol. 2000 Oct;54(1-3):35-54
pubmed: 11035219
Ear Hear. 2017 Nov/Dec;38(6):e335-e342
pubmed: 28562426
Clin Geriatr Med. 2013 Nov;29(4):737-52
pubmed: 24094294
Ear Hear. 2020 Jan/Feb;41(1):182-193
pubmed: 31107364
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Jul;130(1):429-39
pubmed: 21786910
Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 05;12:125
pubmed: 29556173
J Am Acad Audiol. 2007 Jul-Aug;18(7):559-72
pubmed: 18236644
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Oct;50(5):1139-56
pubmed: 17905901
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Feb;57(1):285-96
pubmed: 23882002
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Mar;40(3):e316-e325
pubmed: 30741913
Neuroimage. 2021 Feb 15;227:117675
pubmed: 33359849
Gerontology. 1999 Nov-Dec;45(6):323-8
pubmed: 10559650
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Jul;77(5):1465-87
pubmed: 25828463
Hear Res. 2020 Nov;397:108053
pubmed: 32863099
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2018 Apr;19(2):193-209
pubmed: 29313147
J Acoust Soc Am. 2016 Dec;140(6):4142
pubmed: 28040038
J Voice. 2006 Mar;20(1):18-24
pubmed: 15979277
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004 Sep;5(3):253-60
pubmed: 15492884
J Acoust Soc Am. 1994 Jun;95(6):3529-40
pubmed: 8046144
J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 May;91(5):2881-93
pubmed: 1629481