Measuring sedentary behavior using waist- and thigh-worn accelerometers and inclinometers - are the results comparable?

accelerometer adult inclinometer physical activity sedentary behavior

Journal

Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease
ISSN: 1759-720X
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101517322

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 30 07 2021
accepted: 18 01 2022
entrez: 21 3 2022
pubmed: 22 3 2022
medline: 22 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Objective sensor-based quantification of sedentary behavior is an important tool for planning and evaluating interventions for excessive sedentary behavior in patients with musculoskeletal diseases. Although waist-worn accelerometers are the standard for physical activity (PA) assessment, only thigh-worn inclinometers can clearly distinguish sedentary behavior from any light PA or standing activity. In this study, 53 adults (ages 20-85 years) wore two ActiGraph wGT3X-BT monitors, each containing an inclinometer and accelerometer (set for acquisition of slow movements in all three planes), attached to the right waist and thigh for a period of about 4 days. Both monitors recorded total sedentary time and continuous sedentary 10-min bouts by synchronous accelerometry and inclinometry. Differences and correlations between methods and wearing positions were evaluated against participant age, body mass index (BMI), and number of steps taken. Thigh-worn inclinometry was used as reference. Data from thigh-worn inclinometry and waist-worn accelerometry were highly correlated for total sedentary time [rho = 0.888; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.937] and time in sedentary bouts (rho = 0.818; ICC = 0.848). Nevertheless, accelerometry at the waist underestimated sedentary time by ≈17% ( A waist-worn accelerometer can be used to determine total sedentary time under free-living conditions with sufficient accuracy if the correct settings are chosen. Further investigations are necessary to investigate why short sedentary bouts cannot be reliably assessed. DRKS00024060 (German Clinical Trials Register).

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Objective sensor-based quantification of sedentary behavior is an important tool for planning and evaluating interventions for excessive sedentary behavior in patients with musculoskeletal diseases. Although waist-worn accelerometers are the standard for physical activity (PA) assessment, only thigh-worn inclinometers can clearly distinguish sedentary behavior from any light PA or standing activity.
Methods UNASSIGNED
In this study, 53 adults (ages 20-85 years) wore two ActiGraph wGT3X-BT monitors, each containing an inclinometer and accelerometer (set for acquisition of slow movements in all three planes), attached to the right waist and thigh for a period of about 4 days. Both monitors recorded total sedentary time and continuous sedentary 10-min bouts by synchronous accelerometry and inclinometry. Differences and correlations between methods and wearing positions were evaluated against participant age, body mass index (BMI), and number of steps taken. Thigh-worn inclinometry was used as reference.
Results UNASSIGNED
Data from thigh-worn inclinometry and waist-worn accelerometry were highly correlated for total sedentary time [rho = 0.888; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.937] and time in sedentary bouts (rho = 0.818; ICC = 0.848). Nevertheless, accelerometry at the waist underestimated sedentary time by ≈17% (
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
A waist-worn accelerometer can be used to determine total sedentary time under free-living conditions with sufficient accuracy if the correct settings are chosen. Further investigations are necessary to investigate why short sedentary bouts cannot be reliably assessed.
Trial registration UNASSIGNED
DRKS00024060 (German Clinical Trials Register).

Identifiants

pubmed: 35310836
doi: 10.1177/1759720X221079256
pii: 10.1177_1759720X221079256
pmc: PMC8928357
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1759720X221079256

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), 2022.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interest statement: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Références

Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2014;11:35-49
pubmed: 24765212
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Dec 02;10(12):6645-61
pubmed: 24317382
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Sep;32(9 Suppl):S498-504
pubmed: 10993420
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 May;47(5):952-9
pubmed: 25202847
Arch Public Health. 2020 Jun 3;78:52
pubmed: 32514348
J Aging Phys Act. 2020 Jan 22;:1-11
pubmed: 31968305
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Nov 26;15(1):119
pubmed: 30477509
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2019 Aug 16;16(1):65
pubmed: 31419998
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 May;18(3):294-8
pubmed: 24704421
Neurosci Lett. 2014 Nov 7;583:49-54
pubmed: 25242449
Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Nov 05;6:252
pubmed: 31828072
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 14;10(8):e0134606
pubmed: 26274586
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Sep;41(3):241-50
pubmed: 21855737
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39(1):130-8
pubmed: 26628415
J Phys Act Health. 2014 Jan;11(1):76-84
pubmed: 23249722
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Apr;40(4):639-45
pubmed: 18317383
J Nutr Health Aging. 2020;24(1):63-70
pubmed: 31886810
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jul 24;14:749
pubmed: 25059233
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Jun 10;14(1):75
pubmed: 28599680
Br J Sports Med. 2017 Nov;51(21):1526-1532
pubmed: 28724710
Int J Epidemiol. 2012 Oct;41(5):1460-71
pubmed: 23045206
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Oct;44(10):2009-16
pubmed: 22525772
J Rheumatol. 2016 Mar;43(3):666-72
pubmed: 26773104
Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jan 20;162(2):123-32
pubmed: 25599350
Ergonomics. 2009 Aug;52(8):977-86
pubmed: 19629812
Gait Posture. 2017 Jan;51:174-180
pubmed: 27780084
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 Jun;48(6):1085-90
pubmed: 26741122
Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Nov;43(11):2333-2342
pubmed: 30940917
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Feb;141(1):2-18
pubmed: 21823805
Physiol Meas. 2018 Sep 24;39(9):09TR02
pubmed: 30113317
Circ Res. 2019 Mar;124(5):799-815
pubmed: 30817262
Radiology. 2015 Dec;277(3):826-32
pubmed: 26509226
J Obes. 2012;2012:460271
pubmed: 22175006
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Aug;39(8):1423-34
pubmed: 17762377
Res Nurs Health. 2015 Dec;38(6):492-9
pubmed: 26444969
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Aug;43(8):1561-7
pubmed: 21233777

Auteurs

Tobias Kalisch (T)

Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Albert-Schweitzer-Campus 1, 48149 Muenster, Germany.

Christoph Theil (C)

Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.

Georg Gosheger (G)

Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.

Thomas Ackmann (T)

Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.

Isabell Schoenhals (I)

Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.

Burkhard Moellenbeck (B)

Department of Orthopedics and Tumor Orthopedics, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster, Germany.

Classifications MeSH