Combination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis RS Ratio and CFU Improves the Ability of Murine Efficacy Experiments to Distinguish between Drug Treatments.
16S rRNA burden
BALB/c relapse models
CFU
RS ratio
antimicrobial therapies
drug efficacy
murine drug experiments
pharmacodynamic marker
rRNA
Journal
Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy
ISSN: 1098-6596
Titre abrégé: Antimicrob Agents Chemother
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0315061
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 04 2022
19 04 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
22
3
2022
medline:
22
4
2022
entrez:
21
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Murine tuberculosis drug efficacy studies have historically monitored bacterial burden based on CFU of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in lung homogenate. In an alternative approach, a recently described molecular pharmacodynamic marker called the RS ratio quantifies drug effect on a fundamental cellular process, ongoing rRNA synthesis. Here, we evaluated the ability of different pharmacodynamic markers to distinguish between treatments in three BALB/c mouse experiments at two institutions. We confirmed that different pharmacodynamic markers measure distinct biological responses. We found that a combination of pharmacodynamic markers distinguishes between treatments better than any single marker. The combination of the RS ratio with CFU showed the greatest ability to recapitulate the rank order of regimen treatment-shortening activity, providing proof of concept that simultaneous assessment of pharmacodynamic markers measuring different properties will enhance insight gained from animal models and accelerate development of new combination regimens. These results suggest potential for a new era in which antimicrobial therapies are evaluated not only on culture-based measures of bacterial burden but also on molecular assays that indicate how drugs impact the physiological state of the pathogen.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35311519
doi: 10.1128/aac.02310-21
pmc: PMC9017352
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antitubercular Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0231021Subventions
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R21 AI135652
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI127300
Pays : United States
Organisme : BLRD VA
ID : I01 BX004527
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAID NIH HHS
ID : R01 AI135124
Pays : United States
Organisme : CSRD VA
ID : IK2 CX000914
Pays : United States
Références
J Exp Med. 1956 Nov 1;104(5):763-802
pubmed: 13367342
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jun;49(6):2294-301
pubmed: 15917524
Open Infect Dis J. 2008 Dec;2:59-76
pubmed: 23814629
J Infect Dis. 2015 Jun 15;211 Suppl 3:S83-95
pubmed: 26009617
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996 Dec;40(12):2809-12
pubmed: 9124846
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Dec 15;194(12):1532-1540
pubmed: 27387272
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Aug;52(8):3064-7
pubmed: 24871215
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep 1;188(5):608-12
pubmed: 23822735
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan 15;181(2):174-80
pubmed: 19875686
J Exp Med. 1966 Mar 1;123(3):445-68
pubmed: 4957010
J Clin Microbiol. 2011 Nov;49(11):3905-11
pubmed: 21900522
Front Microbiol. 2015 Jun 23;6:641
pubmed: 26157437
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2017 Jul;105:113-118
pubmed: 28610782
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012 Feb;56(2):731-8
pubmed: 22143517
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Feb;69(2):437-40
pubmed: 24072170
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jun 13;114(24):E4832-E4840
pubmed: 28559332
Nat Commun. 2021 May 18;12(1):2899
pubmed: 34006838
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Apr 19;66(4):e0239821
pubmed: 35315690
Front Microbiol. 2017 May 04;8:717
pubmed: 28522990
mBio. 2018 Nov 20;9(6):
pubmed: 30459198
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011 Mar;55(3):1237-47
pubmed: 21135176
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010 Nov;54(11):4540-4
pubmed: 20713662