Methods for bone quality assessment in human bone tissue: a systematic review.
Bone composition
Bone quality
Imaging
Mechanical testing
Journal
Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research
ISSN: 1749-799X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop Surg Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265112
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 Mar 2022
21 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
31
12
2021
accepted:
02
03
2022
entrez:
22
3
2022
pubmed:
23
3
2022
medline:
24
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
For biomechanical investigations on bone or bone implants, bone quality represents an important potential bias. Several techniques for assessing bone quality have been described in the literature. This study aims to systematically summarize the methods currently available for assessing bone quality in human bone tissue, and to discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques. A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to April 2021. References will be screened and evaluated for eligibility by two independent reviewers as per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies must apply to bone quality assessment with imaging techniques, mechanical testing modalities, and compositional characterization. The terms used for the systematic search were: "(bone quality". Ti,ab.) AND "(human bone specimens)". The systematic review identified 502 relevant articles in total. Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Among them, forty-seven articles investigated several imaging modalities, including radiography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), CT-based techniques, and MRI-based methods. Nineteen articles dealt with mechanical testing approaches, including traditional testing modalities and novel indentation techniques. Nine articles reported the correlation between bone quality and compositional characterization, such as degree of bone mineralization (DBM) and organic composition. A total of 2898 human cadaveric bone specimens were included. Advanced techniques are playing an increasingly important role due to their multiple advantages, focusing on the assessment of bone morphology and microarchitecture. Non-invasive imaging modalities and mechanical testing techniques, as well as the assessment of bone composition, need to complement each other to provide comprehensive and ideal information on the bone quality of human bone specimens.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
For biomechanical investigations on bone or bone implants, bone quality represents an important potential bias. Several techniques for assessing bone quality have been described in the literature. This study aims to systematically summarize the methods currently available for assessing bone quality in human bone tissue, and to discuss the advantages and limitations of these techniques.
METHODS
METHODS
A systematic review of the literature was carried out by searching the PubMed and Web of Science databases from January 2000 to April 2021. References will be screened and evaluated for eligibility by two independent reviewers as per PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Studies must apply to bone quality assessment with imaging techniques, mechanical testing modalities, and compositional characterization. The terms used for the systematic search were: "(bone quality". Ti,ab.) AND "(human bone specimens)".
RESULTS
RESULTS
The systematic review identified 502 relevant articles in total. Sixty-eight articles met the inclusion criteria. Among them, forty-seven articles investigated several imaging modalities, including radiography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), CT-based techniques, and MRI-based methods. Nineteen articles dealt with mechanical testing approaches, including traditional testing modalities and novel indentation techniques. Nine articles reported the correlation between bone quality and compositional characterization, such as degree of bone mineralization (DBM) and organic composition. A total of 2898 human cadaveric bone specimens were included.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Advanced techniques are playing an increasingly important role due to their multiple advantages, focusing on the assessment of bone morphology and microarchitecture. Non-invasive imaging modalities and mechanical testing techniques, as well as the assessment of bone composition, need to complement each other to provide comprehensive and ideal information on the bone quality of human bone specimens.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35313901
doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03041-4
pii: 10.1186/s13018-022-03041-4
pmc: PMC8935787
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
174Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Orthop Res. 2020 May;38(5):972-983
pubmed: 31793028
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jul;21(7):887-93
pubmed: 21872492
Bone. 2012 Apr;50(4):925-9
pubmed: 22270054
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 May;21:9-16
pubmed: 23454364
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Aug;469(8):2128-38
pubmed: 21116752
Bone. 2012 Nov;51(5):953-60
pubmed: 22884723
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 30;8(12):e83662
pubmed: 24386247
J Biomech Eng. 2010 Dec;132(12):121006
pubmed: 21142320
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Feb;42:311-24
pubmed: 25455607
Calcif Tissue Int. 2006 Sep;79(3):160-8
pubmed: 16969591
Bone. 2014 Sep;66:205-13
pubmed: 24928495
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2014 Sep;37:174-85
pubmed: 24929851
Bone. 2015 Jul;76:158-68
pubmed: 25863123
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2015 Dec;52:120-130
pubmed: 26530231
Bone. 2015 Jun;75:1-7
pubmed: 25659950
Diabetes. 1991 Apr;40(4):405-12
pubmed: 2010041
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Jul 19;15:242
pubmed: 25037451
J Craniofac Surg. 2018 Sep;29(6):1661-1665
pubmed: 29762319
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006 Mar;126(2):93-100
pubmed: 16456662
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 10;8(1):15095
pubmed: 30305658
Injury. 2016 Jun;47 Suppl 2:S11-20
pubmed: 27338221
Bone. 2006 Dec;39(6):1218-25
pubmed: 16904959
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 1;25(3):292-7
pubmed: 10703099
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2020 Mar;103:103585
pubmed: 32090913
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Feb 1;25(3):353-7
pubmed: 10703109
Eur Radiol. 2003 Apr;13(4):663-71
pubmed: 12664101
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 May;85(4):611-7
pubmed: 12793573
Aging Dis. 2018 Dec 4;9(6):976-987
pubmed: 30574411
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2013 Jan;28(1):110-6
pubmed: 23141422
Bone. 2016 Jun;87:97-101
pubmed: 27072518
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Aug;20(8):767-71
pubmed: 19489931
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:137
pubmed: 24113838
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2010 May;25(4):292-8
pubmed: 20080324
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2017 Feb;47(1):20-29
pubmed: 28261521
J Biomech. 2004 Jan;37(1):27-35
pubmed: 14672565
J Biomech Eng. 2013 May;135(5):54505
pubmed: 24231966
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020 Feb 07;11:15
pubmed: 32117052
Bone. 2019 Mar;120:187-193
pubmed: 30394355
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35047
pubmed: 22514706
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Aug;85(6):906-12
pubmed: 12931817
Sports Med. 2014 Jan;44(1):37-53
pubmed: 24092631
Surg Radiol Anat. 2016 May;38(4):389-93
pubmed: 26464301
Spine J. 2010 Sep;10(9):784-8
pubmed: 20381430
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012 Nov 13;13:221
pubmed: 23148627
Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):5089-98
pubmed: 19994519
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Sep;25(9):2039-50
pubmed: 20499379
Bone. 2006 Dec;39(6):1210-7
pubmed: 16962838
Bone. 2002 Jul;31(1):1-7
pubmed: 12110404
J Orthop Res. 2011 Nov;29(11):1739-44
pubmed: 21538510
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2001 Mar;16(3):257-62
pubmed: 11240062
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(7):986-95
pubmed: 16552468
Arch Osteoporos. 2018 Mar 5;13(1):18
pubmed: 29508160
Bone. 2015 Apr;73:167-75
pubmed: 25540917
Bone. 2015 Oct;79:8-14
pubmed: 26008609
J Biomed Mater Res. 1999 May;45(2):108-16
pubmed: 10397964
Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Apr;72(2):181-5
pubmed: 11372950
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Mar 2;98(5):356-62
pubmed: 26935457
Bone. 2015 Oct;79:213-21
pubmed: 26079995
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Mar;95(3):364-70
pubmed: 12627111
J Biomech Eng. 2012 Oct;134(10):101001
pubmed: 23083192
Bone. 2017 Dec;105:93-102
pubmed: 28739416
J Orthop Res. 2006 Apr;24(4):664-74
pubmed: 16514636
Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Dec;64(12):3955-62
pubmed: 23124609
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2021 Apr;171(5-6):111-119
pubmed: 33616798
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Dec;477(12):2726-2732
pubmed: 31764342
Bone. 2004 May;34(5):783-9
pubmed: 15121009
Bone. 2013 Nov;57(1):47-55
pubmed: 23899636
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Jan;25(1):64-71
pubmed: 19580459
Bone. 2003 Jan;32(1):35-44
pubmed: 12584034
Invest Radiol. 2001 Apr;36(4):210-7
pubmed: 11283418
Osteoporos Int. 2015 Mar;26(3):865-873
pubmed: 25326375
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2012;48(1):19-25
pubmed: 22456011
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Apr;25(4):746-56
pubmed: 19775199
J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Dec;28(12):2584-91
pubmed: 23677814
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Feb;21(2):195-214
pubmed: 19760059
Homo. 2007;58(2):97-115
pubmed: 17451711
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000 Sep;(378):255-63
pubmed: 10987001
Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41
pubmed: 20171303
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Apr;17(2):307-13
pubmed: 23837565