A preliminary simulation-based qualitative study of healthcare students' experiences of interprofessional primary care scenarios.

Focus group Healthcare students Interprofessional Primary care Simulation Sub-acute scenarios

Journal

Advances in simulation (London, England)
ISSN: 2059-0628
Titre abrégé: Adv Simul (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101700425

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 17 05 2021
accepted: 06 03 2022
entrez: 22 3 2022
pubmed: 23 3 2022
medline: 23 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Introducing interprofessional education (IPE) in healthcare curricula can prepare students for healthcare practices that have become increasingly complex. The use of simulation is promoted to support IPE. This study explores healthcare students' experiences of participating in common, sub-acute patient scenarios that routinely occur in clinical practice in primary care. More specifically, it looks at how sub-acute patient scenarios from primary care can help develop interprofessional collaborative competence. Medical students (N = 10), master's students in advanced geriatric nursing (N = 8) and bachelor's students in nursing (N = 9) participated in the simulations. The students were in their last or second-to-last year of education. We conducted five semi-structured focus group interviews with the participants' directly after the simulation training to elicit experiences related to the scenarios, the simulation and interprofessional collaboration. The transcripts were analysed using systematic text condensation. To supplement the focus group interviews, the students also completed the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment survey (ICCAS), which measures the students' self-assessed interprofessional competence. Three main themes emerged from the analysis of the focus group interviews: realism, uncertainty and reflection. The students emphasised the importance of authentic and recognisable scenarios. They said the vague and unspecific patient symptoms created uncertainty in the situation, making it difficult to understand the patient's diagnosis. Despite that uncertainty, they described the experience as positive. Further, the students expressed that the simulation increased their confidence in interprofessional collaboration and prepared them for future work. The results from the ICCAS questionnaire showed that the students reported a subjective positive change in their interprofessional competence after participating in the scenarios. This study showed that simulation-based IPE with sub-acute primary care scenarios contributes to develop interprofessional collaborative competence in healthcare education. Sub-acute scenarios can supplement the more common approaches with acute care scenarios and aid in developing the collaborative competence required to work in healthcare teams.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Introducing interprofessional education (IPE) in healthcare curricula can prepare students for healthcare practices that have become increasingly complex. The use of simulation is promoted to support IPE. This study explores healthcare students' experiences of participating in common, sub-acute patient scenarios that routinely occur in clinical practice in primary care. More specifically, it looks at how sub-acute patient scenarios from primary care can help develop interprofessional collaborative competence.
METHODS METHODS
Medical students (N = 10), master's students in advanced geriatric nursing (N = 8) and bachelor's students in nursing (N = 9) participated in the simulations. The students were in their last or second-to-last year of education. We conducted five semi-structured focus group interviews with the participants' directly after the simulation training to elicit experiences related to the scenarios, the simulation and interprofessional collaboration. The transcripts were analysed using systematic text condensation. To supplement the focus group interviews, the students also completed the interprofessional collaborative competency attainment survey (ICCAS), which measures the students' self-assessed interprofessional competence.
RESULTS RESULTS
Three main themes emerged from the analysis of the focus group interviews: realism, uncertainty and reflection. The students emphasised the importance of authentic and recognisable scenarios. They said the vague and unspecific patient symptoms created uncertainty in the situation, making it difficult to understand the patient's diagnosis. Despite that uncertainty, they described the experience as positive. Further, the students expressed that the simulation increased their confidence in interprofessional collaboration and prepared them for future work. The results from the ICCAS questionnaire showed that the students reported a subjective positive change in their interprofessional competence after participating in the scenarios.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study showed that simulation-based IPE with sub-acute primary care scenarios contributes to develop interprofessional collaborative competence in healthcare education. Sub-acute scenarios can supplement the more common approaches with acute care scenarios and aid in developing the collaborative competence required to work in healthcare teams.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35314003
doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00204-5
pii: 10.1186/s41077-022-00204-5
pmc: PMC8935844
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

9

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

J Interprof Care. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):907-913
pubmed: 33222563
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 24;19(1):276
pubmed: 31340808
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Dec;8(6):372-377
pubmed: 31705482
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Mar 18;14:52
pubmed: 24636554
MedEdPORTAL. 2019 Oct 18;15:10844
pubmed: 31911935
Med Educ. 2012 Jan;46(1):58-70
pubmed: 22150197
Simul Healthc. 2014 Dec;9(6):339-49
pubmed: 25188485
Simul Healthc. 2006 Spring;1(1):49-55
pubmed: 19088574
J Interprof Care. 2020 Mar-Apr;34(2):184-192
pubmed: 31429336
Nurs Educ Perspect. 2020 May/Jun;41(3):141-145
pubmed: 32028379
J Interprof Care. 2021 Jul-Aug;35(4):604-611
pubmed: 32744140
Adv Simul (Lond). 2017 Apr 08;2:8
pubmed: 29450009
Br J Nurs. 2020 Mar 26;29(6):364-372
pubmed: 32207646
Scand J Public Health. 2012 Dec;40(8):795-805
pubmed: 23221918
J Allied Health. 2019 Fall;48(3):159-166
pubmed: 31487353
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Nov 12;20(1):424
pubmed: 33183276
Lancet. 2010 Dec 4;376(9756):1923-58
pubmed: 21112623
J Interprof Care. 2014 Nov;28(6):553-8
pubmed: 24828620
Simul Healthc. 2016 Jun;11(3):209-17
pubmed: 27254527
Nurse Educ Today. 2021 Apr;99:104816
pubmed: 33662866
Adv Simul (Lond). 2020 Sep 3;5:24
pubmed: 32963816
J Interprof Care. 2021 May 23;:1-6
pubmed: 34027791
J Interprof Care. 2017 Jan;31(1):28-34
pubmed: 27849422
J Interprof Care. 2020 May-Jun;34(3):332-342
pubmed: 31329469
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Nov;75(11):e14725
pubmed: 34382304
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 3;21(1):416
pubmed: 34344334
J Interprof Care. 2018 Jan;32(1):95-97
pubmed: 28862486
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i2-10
pubmed: 15465951
Acad Med. 2014 Jun;89(6):869-75
pubmed: 24871237

Auteurs

Lene Lunde (L)

Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. lene.lunde@medisin.uio.no.

Anne Moen (A)

Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Rune B Jakobsen (RB)

Department of Health Management and Health Economics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Britta Møller (B)

Department of Communication and Psychology, Humanistic Faculty, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Elin O Rosvold (EO)

Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Anja M Brænd (AM)

Department of General Practice, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Classifications MeSH