Developing an evaluation framework for assessing the impact of recovery colleges: protocol for a participatory stakeholder engagement process and cocreated scoping review.
medical education & training
mental health
psychiatry
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 03 2022
21 03 2022
Historique:
entrez:
22
3
2022
pubmed:
23
3
2022
medline:
15
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recovery colleges (RCs) are mental health centres aimed at equipping people with skills to live a meaningful life despite the presence of mental distress. Unique to them is the aspect of cocreation; RCs are designed collaboratively with people of lived experiences of mental health and addictions and care providers. Despite established benefits, there remains a lack of empirical evidence on how RCs work and on their impact. We aim to address this gap by designing a cocreated evaluation framework for RCs. This will be accomplished by engaging RC student/facilitators to provide perspectives on RCs/RC evaluation and cocreate a scoping review identifying evaluation gaps in the literature. Themes identified through these processes will form the evaluation framework. Two methodologies will be used to explore RC evaluation: student/facilitator engagement and a scoping review of current published and grey literature on RC evaluation. Engagement will be achieved using a participatory action research approach consisting of informant interviews of ~25 RC students/facilitators across Canada, which will be thematically analysed. The scoping review will follow methodology described by Arksey and O'Malley modified to support cocreation. Concurrent conducting of the engagement process and scoping review will allow RC students and peer facilitators the opportunity to shape RC evaluations, address gaps in the literature and codesign an evaluation framework focused on recovery-oriented processes and outcomes mattering most to RCs students/facilitators. Ethics approval was received for the RC student/facilitator engagement component from the Centre for Addictions and Mental Health Research Ethics Board (#042-2020) and Ontario Shores Centre for Mental Health Sciences (#20-013-B). Scoping review results will be copresented through national and international medical education conferences and published in open-access peer-reviewed journals. Furthermore, a dissemination strategy on evaluation for the national RC community will be created.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35314472
pii: bmjopen-2021-055289
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055289
pmc: PMC8938698
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e055289Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Dec 1;69(12):1222-1229
pubmed: 30220242
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jan 26;10:26
pubmed: 20102609
Psychiatr Serv. 2020 Sep 1;71(9):928-940
pubmed: 32460684
Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1994;384:140-6
pubmed: 7879636
BMJ. 2013 Nov 20;347:f6753
pubmed: 24259324
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
Health Expect. 2016 Dec;19(6):1183-1202
pubmed: 27878937
World Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;18(2):141-142
pubmed: 31059628
Acad Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;44(2):159-167
pubmed: 31873923
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 09;10(4):e0122499
pubmed: 25856569
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019 Apr 11;17(1):60
pubmed: 30975153
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015 Fall;35 Suppl 2:S70-4
pubmed: 26954006
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 23;13:48
pubmed: 23522333
Qual Health Res. 2016 Nov;26(13):1753-1760
pubmed: 26613970
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 21;18(1):148
pubmed: 30463515