Risk Factors for Positive Margins in High-Grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia After Transformation Zone Excision.
Journal
Journal of lower genital tract disease
ISSN: 1526-0976
Titre abrégé: J Low Genit Tract Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9704963
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Jul 2022
01 Jul 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
23
3
2022
medline:
1
7
2022
entrez:
22
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aim of the study was to evaluate risk factors for positive margins on surgical specimens of patients submitted to transformation zone excision (TZE). We conducted a retrospective study evaluating women submitted to TZE in our center, between 2012 and 2020. Our study population included only women with the diagnosis of high-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) in the pathologic examination of the TZE surgical specimen. Positive margins were defined as the presence of HSIL in the endocervical and/or ectocervical margin of the specimen. Factors evaluated included demographic characteristics, pretreatment Pap smear and human papillomavirus test, colposcopic findings, TZE indication, and pathologic features of the surgical specimen. We performed univariate analysis and logistic regression modeling including variables associated with the outcome of positive margins in the univariate analysis. Our sample included 264 women, with a 15.2% positive margins rate (40 patients). In the univariate analysis, patients with immunocompromised status, HSIL Pap smear, and higher number of quadrants involved in colposcopic examination were more likely to have positive margins. After multivariate analysis, only immunocompromised status was found to be an independent risk factor (odds ratio = 4.94; 95% CI = 1.43-17.15; p < .05). Immunocompromised status was the sole significant predictor for positive margins in TZE surgical specimens. To our knowledge, this is the first report of immunodepression as a risk factor for positive margins in cervical excisional procedures.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35314587
doi: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000668
pii: 00128360-202207000-00003
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
207-211Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, ASCCP.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared they have no conflicts of interest.
Références
Portugal Source: Globocan Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence by Cancer Site . Available at: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/620-portugal-fact-sheets.pdf . Accessed November 23, 2021.
Vieira-Baptista P, Lyra J, Melo C, et al. Immediate loop electrode excisional procedure for high-grade cervical cytology: one size fits all? J Low Genit Tract Dis 2019;23:84.
Lindeque BG. Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005;19:545–61.
Leguevaque P, Motton S, Decharme A, et al. Predictors of recurrence in high-grade cervical lesions and a plan of management. Eur J Surg Oncol 2010;36:1073–9.
Ghaem-Maghami S, Sagi S, Majeed G, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and risk of treatment failure: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2007;8:985–93.
Kyrgiou M, Athanasiou A, Kalliala IEJ, et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial lesions and early invasive disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;11:CD012847.
Öz M, Çetinkaya N, Korkmaz E, et al. Optimal cone size to predict positive surgical margins after cold knife conization (CKC) and the risk factors for residual disease. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2016;17:159–62.
Liss J, Alston M, Krull MB, et al. Predictors of positive margins at time of loop electrosurgical excision procedure. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2017;21:64–6.
Cervical cone dimension and linear CIN extension trend: 28 years' experience of a tertiary center. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2021;42:865.
Bornstein J, Bentley J, Bösze P, et al. 2011 Colposcopic Terminology of the International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:166–72.
Arbyn M, Redman CWE, Verdoodt F, et al. Incomplete excision of cervical precancer as a predictor of treatment failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol 2017;18:1665–79.
Dugué PA, Rebolj M, Garred P, et al. Immunosuppression and risk of cervical cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2013;13:29–42.
Cohen PA, Jhingran A, Oaknin A, et al. Cervical cancer. Lancet 2019;393:169–82.
Kawano K, Tsuda N, Nishio S, et al. Identification of appropriate cone length to avoid positive cone margin in high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Gynecol Oncol 2016;27:e54.
Kliemann LM, Silva M, Reinheimer M, et al. Minimal cold knife conization height for high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012;165:342–6.
Panna S, Luanratanakorn S. Positive margin prevalence and risk factors with cervical specimens obtained from loop electrosurgical excision procedures and cold knife conization. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2009;10:637–40.
Durmuş Y, Karalök A, Başaran D, et al. Can we predict surgical margin positivity while performing cervical excisional procedures? J Obstet Gynaecol 2020;40:666–72.
Tillmanns TD, Falkner CA, Engle DB, et al. Preoperative predictors of positive margins after loop electrosurgical excisional procedure–cone. Gynecol Oncol 2006;100:379–84.
Chen Y, Lu H, Wan X, et al. Factors associated with positive margins in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and postconization management. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2009;107:107–10.
Ulrich D, Tamussino K, Petru E, et al. Conization of the uterine cervix: does the level of gynecologist's training predict margin status? Int J Gynecol Pathol 2012;31:382–6.