Phantom Validation of a Conservation of Activity-Based Partial Volume Correction Method for Arterial Input Function in Dynamic PET Imaging.
cancer imaging
dynamic PET
kinetic modelling
partial volume correction
quantitative imaging
Journal
Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.)
ISSN: 2379-139X
Titre abrégé: Tomography
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101671170
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
21 03 2022
21 03 2022
Historique:
received:
15
01
2022
revised:
10
03
2022
accepted:
16
03
2022
entrez:
22
3
2022
pubmed:
23
3
2022
medline:
25
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Dynamic PET (dPET) imaging can be utilized to perform kinetic modelling of various physiologic processes, which are exploited by the constantly expanding range of targeted radiopharmaceuticals. To date, dPET remains primarily in the research realm due to a number of technical challenges, not least of which is addressing partial volume effects (PVE) in the input function. We propose a series of equations for the correction of PVE in the input function and present the results of a validation study, based on a purpose built phantom.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35314646
pii: tomography8020069
doi: 10.3390/tomography8020069
pmc: PMC8938778
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
842-857Références
J Nucl Med. 2017 Jun;58(6):911-919
pubmed: 28232611
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Jan;48(1):21-39
pubmed: 32430580
J Nucl Med. 2012 Jul;53(7):1041-7
pubmed: 22627001
EJNMMI Phys. 2015 Dec;2(Suppl 1):A80
pubmed: 26956342
Methods. 2002 Jul;27(3):218-25
pubmed: 12183109
J Neurochem. 1977 May;28(5):897-916
pubmed: 864466
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Jun;47(6):1353-1367
pubmed: 31418054
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011 Oct;31(10):1986-98
pubmed: 21811289
J Nucl Med. 2017 May;58(5):744-749
pubmed: 27789716
PET Clin. 2007 Apr;2(2):267-77
pubmed: 27157877
Radiol Phys Technol. 2017 Mar;10(1):41-48
pubmed: 27380307
Mol Imaging Biol. 2012 Apr;14(2):131-46
pubmed: 21842339
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2020 Mar;47(3):592-602
pubmed: 31728588
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006 Oct;33(10):1115-22
pubmed: 16763820
Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Jan 15;5(2):127-42
pubmed: 25973334
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1997 Nov-Dec;21(6):907-9
pubmed: 9386282
Ann Neurol. 1979 Nov;6(5):371-88
pubmed: 117743
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017 Sep;44(10):1682-1691
pubmed: 28540417
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1041-50
pubmed: 18042494
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2012 Nov-Dec;36(6):762-7
pubmed: 23192217
J Nucl Med. 2005 May;46(5):763-9
pubmed: 15872348
Semin Nucl Med. 2011 Jul;41(4):246-64
pubmed: 21624560
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998 Jul;18(7):716-23
pubmed: 9663501
Clin Nucl Med. 2017 Jun;42(6):e286-e293
pubmed: 28221194
J Nucl Med. 2016 Oct;57(10):1642-1649
pubmed: 27230933
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2020 Apr;40(4):895-903
pubmed: 31122112
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2010 Aug;37(8):1539-50
pubmed: 20437239
Magn Reson Imaging. 2012 Nov;30(9):1203-15
pubmed: 22819579
Med Phys. 2011 Aug;38(8):4866-80
pubmed: 21928658
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016 Jul;43(7):1288-99
pubmed: 26753602
EJNMMI Phys. 2016 Dec;3(1):30
pubmed: 27957730