Larger visual changes compress time: The inverted effect of asemantic visual features on interval time perception.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
16
02
2021
accepted:
04
03
2022
entrez:
22
3
2022
pubmed:
23
3
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Time perception is fluid and affected by manipulations to visual inputs. Previous literature shows that changes to low-level visual properties alter time judgments at the millisecond-level. At longer intervals, in the span of seconds and minutes, high-level cognitive effects (e.g., emotions, memories) elicited by visual inputs affect time perception, but these effects are confounded with semantic information in these inputs, and are therefore challenging to measure and control. In this work, we investigate the effect of asemantic visual properties (pure visual features devoid of emotional or semantic value) on interval time perception. Our experiments were conducted with binary and production tasks in both conventional and head-mounted displays, testing the effects of four different visual features (spatial luminance contrast, temporal frequency, field of view, and visual complexity). Our results reveal a consistent pattern: larger visual changes all shorten perceived time in intervals of up to 3min, remarkably contrary to their effect on millisecond-level perception. Our findings may help alter participants' time perception, which can have broad real-world implications.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35316292
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265591
pii: PONE-D-21-05078
pmc: PMC8939824
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0265591Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Some of the authors (LH, ZB, QS) of this manuscript were employed by Adobe, Inc. or Adobe Research during this project. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
J Vis. 2007 Jul 06;7(10):2.1-5
pubmed: 17997671
Mil Psychol. 2009 Jan 1;21(S1):S123-S129
pubmed: 20454542
PLoS One. 2007 Nov 28;2(11):e1264
pubmed: 18043760
Percept Psychophys. 2004 Oct;66(7):1171-89
pubmed: 15751474
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Apr;13(2):250-5
pubmed: 12744981
Support Care Cancer. 2011 Apr;19(4):555-64
pubmed: 20336327
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2018 Apr;24(4):1633-1642
pubmed: 29553930
Percept Psychophys. 1997 Oct;59(7):1118-40
pubmed: 9360484
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Jan;136(1):20-34
pubmed: 20955998
J Safety Res. 2002 Spring;33(1):117-28
pubmed: 11979633
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 13;9(1):4378
pubmed: 30867525
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):755-65
pubmed: 16163383
Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 21;5:917
pubmed: 25191296
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 May;80(4):929-950
pubmed: 29363029
Conscious Cogn. 2015 Dec 15;38:165-71
pubmed: 26115594
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 May;10(3):332-41
pubmed: 15147591
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2020 Feb;42(2):502-508
pubmed: 30802849
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2016 Apr;22(4):1387-95
pubmed: 26780806
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(12):1583-92
pubmed: 12887983
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 27;8(1):6690
pubmed: 29703928
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 24;13(10):e0205145
pubmed: 30356243