Olaparib beyond progression compared with platinum chemotherapy after secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: phase III randomized, open-label MITO 35b study, a project of the MITO-MANGO groups.
Adenosine Diphosphate
/ therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
/ drug therapy
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
Female
Humans
Mangifera
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ drug therapy
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Phthalazines
Piperazines
Platinum
/ therapeutic use
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
Ribose
/ therapeutic use
BRCA1 protein
BRCA2 protein
ovarian cancer
Journal
International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society
ISSN: 1525-1438
Titre abrégé: Int J Gynecol Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9111626
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 06 2022
06 06 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
24
3
2022
medline:
9
6
2022
entrez:
23
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have transformed the management landscape for patients with ovarian cancer, demonstrating remarkable improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival. Unfortunately, most relapses are due to an acquired mechanism of resistance to these agents. We hypothesize that secondary cytoreductive surgery, removing resistant clones, might help to overcome the development of resistance to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, prolonging their therapeutic effect. To determine the efficacy of olaparib beyond progression compared with standard platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer progressed during or after poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance therapy after secondary cytoreductive surgery. Olaparib administered beyond progression is more effective in increasing progression-free survival and progression-free survival 2 compared with second-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients after secondary cytoreductive surgery. Phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive olaparib or platinum-based chemotherapy of the investigator's choice. Eligible patients must have high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer progressed during or after first-line poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance therapy and must have undergone secondary cytoreductive surgery. The dual primary endpoints will include progression-free survival and progression-free survival 2. Progression-free survival is defined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 as the time between randomization and progression or death from any cause. Progression-free survival 2 is defined by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1 as the time frame from randomization to the second progression or death from any cause after subsequent treatment. Approximately 200 patients will be enrolled in this study. Enrollment will be completed in 2024. Results will be presented in 2026. EudraCT 2021-000245-41 NCT05255471.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have transformed the management landscape for patients with ovarian cancer, demonstrating remarkable improvements in progression-free survival and overall survival. Unfortunately, most relapses are due to an acquired mechanism of resistance to these agents. We hypothesize that secondary cytoreductive surgery, removing resistant clones, might help to overcome the development of resistance to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, prolonging their therapeutic effect.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
To determine the efficacy of olaparib beyond progression compared with standard platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer progressed during or after poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance therapy after secondary cytoreductive surgery.
STUDY HYPOTHESIS
Olaparib administered beyond progression is more effective in increasing progression-free survival and progression-free survival 2 compared with second-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients after secondary cytoreductive surgery.
TRIAL DESIGN
Phase III, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. Eligible patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive olaparib or platinum-based chemotherapy of the investigator's choice.
MAJOR ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
Eligible patients must have high-grade serous or endometrioid ovarian cancer progressed during or after first-line poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor maintenance therapy and must have undergone secondary cytoreductive surgery.
PRIMARY ENDPOINT
The dual primary endpoints will include progression-free survival and progression-free survival 2. Progression-free survival is defined by the investigator using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 as the time between randomization and progression or death from any cause. Progression-free survival 2 is defined by the investigator using RECIST version 1.1 as the time frame from randomization to the second progression or death from any cause after subsequent treatment.
SAMPLE SIZE
Approximately 200 patients will be enrolled in this study.
ESTIMATED DATES FOR COMPLETING ACCRUAL AND PRESENTING RESULTS
Enrollment will be completed in 2024. Results will be presented in 2026.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
EudraCT 2021-000245-41 NCT05255471.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35318277
pii: ijgc-2022-003435
doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003435
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents
0
Phthalazines
0
Piperazines
0
Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors
0
Platinum
49DFR088MY
Adenosine Diphosphate
61D2G4IYVH
Ribose
681HV46001
olaparib
WOH1JD9AR8
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05255471']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
799-803Informations de copyright
© IGCS and ESGO 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: FP reports honoraria for educational and advisory activity from Incyte, GSK, Eli Lilly, Ipsen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Roche, BMS, Bayer, Clovis, Pierre Fabre and grants for clinical trials to his institution from Roche, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, MSD, Bayer, Incyte Taiho, Janssen, Exelixis, Ailenor, Daiichi Sankyo. SP reports honoraria from AstraZeneca, MSD, Roche, Pfizer, Clovis, GSK, Pharmamar and research funding from MSD, Roche, AstraZeneca and Pfizer. NN reports personal financial interests (speaker’s fee and/or advisory boards): MSD, Qiagen, Bayer, Biocartis, Illumina, Incyte, Roche, BMS, MERCK, Thermofisher, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Novartis and institutional financial interests (financial support to research projects) from MERCK, Thermofisher, QIAGEN, Roche, AstraZeneca, Biocartis, Illumina, Blueprint.