Semantic systems are mentalistically activated for and by social partners.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
22 03 2022
22 03 2022
Historique:
received:
08
06
2021
accepted:
03
03
2022
entrez:
23
3
2022
pubmed:
24
3
2022
medline:
6
5
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
A recently discovered electrophysiological response, the social N400, suggests that we use our language system to track how social partners comprehend language. Listeners show an increased N400 response, when themselves not, only a communicative partner experiences a semantic incongruity. Does the N400 reflect purely semantic or mentalistic computations as well? Do we attribute language comprehension to communicative partners using our semantic systems? In five electrophysiological experiments we identified two subcomponents of the social N400. First, we manipulated the presence-absence of an Observer during object naming: the semantic memory system was activated by the presence of a social partner in addition to semantic predictions for the self. Next, we induced a false belief-and a consequent miscomprehension-in the Observer. Participants showed the social N400, over and above the social presence effect, to labels that were incongruent for the Observer, even though they were congruent for them. This effect appeared only if participants received explicit instructions to track the comprehension of the Observer. These findings suggest that the semantic systems of the brain are not merely sensitive to social information and contribute to the attribution of comprehension, but they appear to be mentalistic in nature.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35318349
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08306-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-08306-w
pmc: PMC8941134
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4866Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 7;31(36):12849-54
pubmed: 21900563
Psychol Sci. 2018 Apr;29(4):614-622
pubmed: 29447070
Psychol Sci. 2012 Aug 1;23(8):842-7
pubmed: 22760885
Dev Sci. 2019 Mar;22(2):e12751
pubmed: 30184313
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):128-34
pubmed: 24825307
Science. 1980 Jan 11;207(4427):203-5
pubmed: 7350657
Brain Res. 2012 Mar 29;1446:127-43
pubmed: 22361114
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
pubmed: 17695343
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 Nov;11(6):657-71
pubmed: 10601747
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Dec 1;4(12):463-470
pubmed: 11115760
Brain Lang. 2006 Jun;97(3):279-93
pubmed: 16343606
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Dec;9(12):920-33
pubmed: 19020511
Psychol Sci. 2019 Jan;30(1):3-19
pubmed: 30444681
Psychol Bull. 2021 Mar;147(3):293-327
pubmed: 33151703
Child Dev. 2009 Mar-Apr;80(2):318-26
pubmed: 19466994
J Neurosci. 2003 Jun 15;23(12):5258-63
pubmed: 12832550
Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):211-38
pubmed: 8039362
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Sep 27;108(39):16428-33
pubmed: 21885736
Psychol Bull. 2020 Nov;146(11):941-969
pubmed: 32852961
J Exp Child Psychol. 2017 Dec;164:45-54
pubmed: 28779699
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Dec;19(12):2767-96
pubmed: 19329570
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):728-33
pubmed: 22692337
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 13;9:1453
pubmed: 30150960
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Aug 25;117(34):20483-20494
pubmed: 32788359
Neuroreport. 2004 Apr 29;15(6):991-5
pubmed: 15076721
Cognition. 2014 Jan;130(1):128-33
pubmed: 24216021
Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47
pubmed: 20809790
Science. 2010 Dec 24;330(6012):1830-4
pubmed: 21205671
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Aug;8(8):1117-21
pubmed: 16007080
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
pubmed: 5146491
Conscious Cogn. 2016 Apr;41:93-103
pubmed: 26897297
Cortex. 2020 Sep;130:413-425
pubmed: 32540159
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 26;4:863
pubmed: 24324449
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2020 Jun;43:100783
pubmed: 32510346
Psychol Rev. 2009 Oct;116(4):953-70
pubmed: 19839692