The diagnostic utility of DNA copy number analysis of core needle biopsies from soft tissue and bone tumors.
Journal
Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology
ISSN: 1530-0307
Titre abrégé: Lab Invest
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376617
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
08 2022
08 2022
Historique:
received:
30
11
2021
accepted:
08
02
2022
revised:
26
01
2022
pubmed:
24
3
2022
medline:
27
7
2022
entrez:
23
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Morphologic and immunohistochemical analysis of preoperative core needle biopsies (CNB) is important in the management of patients with soft tissue and bone tumors (STBTs). Most SBTB subtypes have more or less extensive DNA copy number aberrations (CNA), potentially providing useful diagnostic information. To evaluate the technical feasibility of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis and the diagnostic usefulness of the copy number profiles, we studied CNBs from 171 patients with suspected STBTs. SNP array analysis could be performed on 168 (98%) of the samples. The CNA profile was compatible with the CNB diagnosis in 87% of the cases. Discrepant cases were dominated by false-negative results due to nonrepresentative material or contamination with normal cells. 70 genomic profiles were indicative of specific histopathologic tumor entities and in agreement with the corresponding CNB diagnoses in 83%. In 96 of the cases with aberrant CNA profiles, the SNP profiles were of sufficient quality for segmentation, allowing clustering analysis on the basis of the Jaccard similarity index. The analysis of these segment files showed three major CNA clusters, based on the complexity levels and the predominance of gains versus losses. For 43 of these CNB samples, we had SNP array data also from their corresponding surgical samples. In 33 of these pairs, the two corresponding samples clustered next to each other, with Jaccard scores ranging from 0.61 to 0.99 (median 0.96). Also, for those tumor pairs that did not cluster together, the Jaccard scores were relatively high (median 0.9). 10 cases showed discrepant results, mainly due to varying degrees of normal cell contamination or technical issues. Thus, the copy number profile seen in a CNB is typically highly representative of the major cell population in the tumor.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35318454
doi: 10.1038/s41374-022-00770-2
pii: S0023-6837(22)00094-0
pmc: PMC9309094
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
838-845Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 10;9(1):3662
pubmed: 30201954
Sci Transl Med. 2020 Jun 10;12(547):
pubmed: 32522803
Cell. 2017 Feb 9;168(4):613-628
pubmed: 28187284
Sci Rep. 2016 Oct 31;6:36158
pubmed: 27796336
Hum Pathol. 2002 Jan;33(1):111-5
pubmed: 11823981
Genome Biol. 2011 Oct 24;12(10):R108
pubmed: 22023820
Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Jan;33(1):50-7
pubmed: 18852676
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;4(10):1398-1404
pubmed: 29801054
Cell. 2021 Apr 15;184(8):2239-2254.e39
pubmed: 33831375
Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jan;51(1):75-83
pubmed: 25466504
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2113-23
pubmed: 17908885
J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Feb;9(2):
pubmed: 33637599
Cytopathology. 2021 Jan;32(1):7-19
pubmed: 32926591
Cancer Genet. 2011 Apr;204(4):203-6
pubmed: 21536238
Transl Oncol. 2020 Dec;13(12):100870
pubmed: 32950930
Nat Med. 2010 Jul;16(7):781-7
pubmed: 20581836
Am J Surg Pathol. 2021 Jun 1;45(6):812-819
pubmed: 33239505
Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2019 Feb;58(2):111-123
pubmed: 30382607
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 1;25(21):6346-6356
pubmed: 31175097