First in-human trial and prospective case series of an articulated laparoscopic camera system in minimally invasive surgery in gynecology: an IDEAL stage 1 and 2a study.
development study
device evaluation
minimally invasive surgical procedures
natural orifice endoscopic surgery
obstetrics and gynecology devices
Journal
BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies
ISSN: 2631-4940
Titre abrégé: BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764673
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
24
09
2021
accepted:
15
02
2022
entrez:
24
3
2022
pubmed:
25
3
2022
medline:
25
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Precision Robotics' Sirius Robotic Flexible Endoscopic System is a new, fully integrated, compact three-dimensional laparoscopic camera system with a disposable single-use flexible tip that can change its viewing direction. This IDEAL Stage 1 and 2a study assessed its safety, reliability and potential efficacy particularly for single incision laparoscopic surgery and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Prospective single-institution, single-surgeon study. The study was conducted in a multispecialty hospital. Women aged 18-70 years scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery were invited to participate. An information sheet and consent was available for the women and an informed consent was obtained. Thirteen participants completed this study. The laparoscopic procedures were done in the usual manner. The only difference was the Sirius System was used in place of the conventional laparoscope. All other procedures and instruments remained the same. Primary outcome was the proportion of women who successfully completed the intended procedure using the Sirius System without conversion to another camera system, camera users and surgeon's view and experience, and iterations and modifications to the system. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications during the first 6 weeks following surgery, and duration of surgery. 85% (11/13) of women had their procedure completed successfully using the Sirius System. Two women required immediate conversion to the conventional laparoscope due to technical issues. There were no intraoperative complications. Users agreed that the improved field of view was beneficial for laparoscopic surgery. Iterative improvements were made in the imaging quality, user interface and manufacturing quality. Sirius System has early indications for safety and efficacy for intermediate and major minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures in gynecology. Further studies are needed to confirm it can replace a conventional laparoscope in the surgical workflow. NCT05048407.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35321072
doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2021-000117
pii: bmjsit-2021-000117
pmc: PMC8900025
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05048407']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e000117Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: TYN is Clinical Advisor to Precision Robotics (Hong Kong) Limited, SYN is employee of Precision Robotics (Hong Kong) Limited, PLBL is employee of Precision Robotics (Hong Kong) Limited.
Références
Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;46(10):1663-1675
pubmed: 29948372
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jun;28(6):1254-1261
pubmed: 33516958
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542
Br J Surg. 2016 Apr;103(5):607-15
pubmed: 26865013
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Jan;31(1):12-39
pubmed: 33397713
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov - Dec;24(7):1083-1095
pubmed: 28705751
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(8):1147-53
pubmed: 22548907
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Sep;48(14):2155-62
pubmed: 22503396
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1105-12
pubmed: 19782876
Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):82-85
pubmed: 32649459
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):772-80
pubmed: 20638899
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):211-220
pubmed: 29697448
Rep U S. 2012 Oct 12;2012:1988-1993
pubmed: 24748998
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):1088-94
pubmed: 26009278
JAMA. 2017 Mar 28;317(12):1224-1233
pubmed: 28350928