School-based self-management intervention using theatre to improve asthma control in adolescents: a pilot cluster-randomised controlled trial.
Asthma
Paediatrics
School
Self-management
Journal
Pilot and feasibility studies
ISSN: 2055-5784
Titre abrégé: Pilot Feasibility Stud
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101676536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Mar 2022
23 Mar 2022
Historique:
received:
06
07
2021
accepted:
15
02
2022
entrez:
24
3
2022
pubmed:
25
3
2022
medline:
25
3
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Children with poorly controlled asthma have higher rates of unplanned healthcare use and school absences, as well as lower rates of medication adherence and knowledge. They also feel less comfortable using their medication at school, due to social fears and bullying. In this study, this was addressed through two school-based self-management interventions piloted to determine which one to use in a full trial. We sought to assess the feasibility and acceptability of two school-based self-management intervention aimed at improving asthma control. Schools in London were randomised to (i) a theatre workshop for the whole year group aimed at raising awareness of asthma in schools, followed by self-management workshops for children (full intervention), (ii) theatre workshop alone (theatre only), or (iii) usual care (controls). Opt-out consent was obtained from parents. The study was a cluster randomised pilot trial, using London schools as the unit of allocation. Our primary aim was to assess the feasibility of delivering a self-management intervention in schools aimed at improving the asthma control test (ACT) score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included acceptability of the school-based interventions, suitability of the theatre intervention and the full intervention with the self-management workshops, and generation of randomised data to inform future power calculations. Data were analysed by generalised mixed-effect models. The recruitment strategy for this trial was effective. Five schools were randomised to full intervention (189 children), four to theatre only (103 children), and six to controls (83 children). Asthma control test (ACT) score at baseline and 6 months was obtained from 178/358 participating children. Compared with the controls, there were no large differences found in ACT score with the full intervention; knowledge and perception of asthma improved though. GP and hospital visits increased in the full intervention group. Compared with controls, ACT score was unchanged in the theatre only group. The asthma self-management intervention trial in schools is feasible and acceptable. The full intervention consisting of both theatre and self-management workshop for asthmatics tended to be better suited to improve outcomes than the theatre intervention on its own. This full intervention should be the one carried forward into a main trial if funding for further research was sought. Further work is needed to understand why there was evidence that unscheduled visits to healthcare professionals increased with the full intervention. The study was registered on the clinical trials database on 14th May 2018 (ID NCT03536416 ).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Children with poorly controlled asthma have higher rates of unplanned healthcare use and school absences, as well as lower rates of medication adherence and knowledge. They also feel less comfortable using their medication at school, due to social fears and bullying. In this study, this was addressed through two school-based self-management interventions piloted to determine which one to use in a full trial.
METHODS
METHODS
We sought to assess the feasibility and acceptability of two school-based self-management intervention aimed at improving asthma control. Schools in London were randomised to (i) a theatre workshop for the whole year group aimed at raising awareness of asthma in schools, followed by self-management workshops for children (full intervention), (ii) theatre workshop alone (theatre only), or (iii) usual care (controls). Opt-out consent was obtained from parents. The study was a cluster randomised pilot trial, using London schools as the unit of allocation. Our primary aim was to assess the feasibility of delivering a self-management intervention in schools aimed at improving the asthma control test (ACT) score at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included acceptability of the school-based interventions, suitability of the theatre intervention and the full intervention with the self-management workshops, and generation of randomised data to inform future power calculations. Data were analysed by generalised mixed-effect models.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The recruitment strategy for this trial was effective. Five schools were randomised to full intervention (189 children), four to theatre only (103 children), and six to controls (83 children). Asthma control test (ACT) score at baseline and 6 months was obtained from 178/358 participating children. Compared with the controls, there were no large differences found in ACT score with the full intervention; knowledge and perception of asthma improved though. GP and hospital visits increased in the full intervention group. Compared with controls, ACT score was unchanged in the theatre only group.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The asthma self-management intervention trial in schools is feasible and acceptable. The full intervention consisting of both theatre and self-management workshop for asthmatics tended to be better suited to improve outcomes than the theatre intervention on its own. This full intervention should be the one carried forward into a main trial if funding for further research was sought. Further work is needed to understand why there was evidence that unscheduled visits to healthcare professionals increased with the full intervention.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
The study was registered on the clinical trials database on 14th May 2018 (ID NCT03536416 ).
Identifiants
pubmed: 35321754
doi: 10.1186/s40814-022-01031-1
pii: 10.1186/s40814-022-01031-1
pmc: PMC8941818
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03536416']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
67Subventions
Organisme : barts' charity
ID : MGU0400
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Thorax. 2019 May;74(5):432-438
pubmed: 30686788
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009 Oct;124(4):719-23.e1
pubmed: 19767070
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Mar;111(3):498-502
pubmed: 12642828
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jul;114(1):40-7
pubmed: 15241342
J Pediatr Psychol. 2003 Jul-Aug;28(5):323-33
pubmed: 12808009
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Sep 2;6:122
pubmed: 32884832
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 23;9(4):e025867
pubmed: 31015270
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6
pubmed: 10987780
J Asthma. 2017 Dec;54(10):1033-1040
pubmed: 28332884
Lancet. 2018 Jan 27;391(10118):303-304
pubmed: 29413036
BMJ. 2008 Sep 29;337:a1655
pubmed: 18824488
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 28;1:CD011651
pubmed: 30687940
Eur Respir J. 2006 May;27(5):921-8
pubmed: 16455821
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Nov;64(628):564
pubmed: 25348975
J Psychosom Res. 2006 Jun;60(6):631-7
pubmed: 16731240
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Mar;117(3):549-56
pubmed: 16522452
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42
pubmed: 21513547
Schizophr Res. 2000 May 5;42(3):241-7
pubmed: 10785582