Primary balloon angioplasty of venous Sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension.
angioplasty
intracranial pressure
stenosis
stent
Journal
Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences
ISSN: 2385-2011
Titre abrégé: Interv Neuroradiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9602695
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Aug 2023
Historique:
pmc-release:
01
08
2024
medline:
4
8
2023
pubmed:
25
3
2022
entrez:
24
3
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Venous sinus stenosis (VSS) stenting has emerged as an effective treatment for patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH). However, stenting carries risk of in-stent stenosis/thrombosis and cumulative bleeding risk from long-term dual antiplatelet (DAPT) use. Thus, we investigated the potential safety and efficacy of primary balloon angioplasty as an alternative to stenting in IIH. A prospectively maintained single-center registry of IIH patients undergoing endovascular procedures was queried. Inclusion criteria included patients with confirmed IIH and angiographically demonstrable VSS who underwent interventions from 2012- 2021. Patients were dichotomized into primary balloon angioplasty (Group A) and primary stenting (Group S), comparing clinical outcomes using bivariate analyses. 62 patients were included with median age of 33 [IQR 26-37], 74% females. Group A (9/62) and Group S (53/62) had similar baseline characteristics. Papilledema improvement was higher in Group S at 6 weeks and 6 months (44 vs. 93, p = 0.002 and 44 vs. 92%, p = 0.004), with similar improvements across all symptoms. Group S had higher mean post-procedure venous pressure gradient change (8 vs. 3 mmHg, p = 0.02) and a lower CSF opening pressure at 6 months (23 vs. 36 cmH2O, p < 0.001). VPS rescue rate was higher in Group A (44 vs. 2%, p = 0.001). There was only one procedural complications; a subdural hematoma in Group A. Primary VSS balloon angioplasty provides a marginal and short-lived improvement of IIH symptoms compared to stenting. These findings suggest a cautious and limited role for short-term rescue angioplasty in poor shunting and stenting candidates with refractory IIH.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Venous sinus stenosis (VSS) stenting has emerged as an effective treatment for patients with Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH). However, stenting carries risk of in-stent stenosis/thrombosis and cumulative bleeding risk from long-term dual antiplatelet (DAPT) use. Thus, we investigated the potential safety and efficacy of primary balloon angioplasty as an alternative to stenting in IIH.
METHODS
METHODS
A prospectively maintained single-center registry of IIH patients undergoing endovascular procedures was queried. Inclusion criteria included patients with confirmed IIH and angiographically demonstrable VSS who underwent interventions from 2012- 2021. Patients were dichotomized into primary balloon angioplasty (Group A) and primary stenting (Group S), comparing clinical outcomes using bivariate analyses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
62 patients were included with median age of 33 [IQR 26-37], 74% females. Group A (9/62) and Group S (53/62) had similar baseline characteristics. Papilledema improvement was higher in Group S at 6 weeks and 6 months (44 vs. 93, p = 0.002 and 44 vs. 92%, p = 0.004), with similar improvements across all symptoms. Group S had higher mean post-procedure venous pressure gradient change (8 vs. 3 mmHg, p = 0.02) and a lower CSF opening pressure at 6 months (23 vs. 36 cmH2O, p < 0.001). VPS rescue rate was higher in Group A (44 vs. 2%, p = 0.001). There was only one procedural complications; a subdural hematoma in Group A.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Primary VSS balloon angioplasty provides a marginal and short-lived improvement of IIH symptoms compared to stenting. These findings suggest a cautious and limited role for short-term rescue angioplasty in poor shunting and stenting candidates with refractory IIH.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35323053
doi: 10.1177/15910199221089446
pmc: PMC10399507
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
358-362Références
Radiology. 2005 Nov;237(2):620-6
pubmed: 16192322
J Neurosurg. 2018 Sep;129(3):723-731
pubmed: 28984521
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jan;15(1):78-91
pubmed: 26700907
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 Jul;27(7):1870-1877
pubmed: 29530461
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;127:75-8
pubmed: 25459247
Neurology. 2005 Oct 11;65(7):1090-3
pubmed: 16217064
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Feb;11(2):175-178
pubmed: 29871989
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Apr;11(4):380-385
pubmed: 30166333
J Neuroophthalmol. 2013 Jun;33(2):117-22
pubmed: 23502837
J Neuroophthalmol. 2017 Jun;37(2):113-121
pubmed: 27556959
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Apr;22(4):685-9
pubmed: 25579238
Neurosurgery. 2008 May;62(5):1053-60; discussion 1060-2
pubmed: 18580803
Surg Neurol Int. 2021 Jan 13;12:14
pubmed: 33500829
JAMA. 2014 Apr 23-30;311(16):1641-51
pubmed: 24756514
J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Aug;10(8):721-728
pubmed: 29523749
Am J Cardiol. 1984 Jun 15;53(12):69C-71C
pubmed: 6233891
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007 Apr;28(4):656-9
pubmed: 17416816
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jul;151:e86-e93
pubmed: 33819705
J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar 2;130(3):999-1005
pubmed: 29498569