Is It Time to Commit to a Process to Re-Evaluate Oncology Drugs? A Descriptive Analysis of Systemic Therapies for Solid Tumour Indications Reviewed in Canada from 2017 to 2021.

drug access drug reimbursement health technology assessment reassessment

Journal

Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.)
ISSN: 1718-7729
Titre abrégé: Curr Oncol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 9502503

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 03 2022
Historique:
received: 19 12 2021
revised: 02 03 2022
accepted: 08 03 2022
entrez: 24 3 2022
pubmed: 25 3 2022
medline: 15 4 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

We undertook an analysis of the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH)'s health technology assessments (HTAs) of systemic therapies for solid tumour indications to determine if a mechanism to re-evaluate HTA decisions is needed based on the level of certainty supporting the original recommendation. To measure the certainty in the evidence, we analysed if: (1) overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint in the pivotal trial, (2) median OS was available at the time of the recommendation, and (3) the expert review committee explicitly identified gaps in the evidence. There were 96 drugs approved by Health Canada that met our eligibility criteria between 1 January 2017 and 31 October 2021. Median OS was not estimable at the time of the recommendation in 57% of the positive recommendations, and the uncertainty in the magnitude of clinical benefit was identified by the expert review committee in 21% of the positive recommendations. There is uncertainty at the time of the HTA recommendation for many drugs, and thus a need to implement a process to re-evaluate drugs in Canada to allow patients timely access to promising therapies while ensuring long-term value of therapies to patients and the healthcare system.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35323356
pii: curroncol29030156
doi: 10.3390/curroncol29030156
pmc: PMC8947363
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1919-1931

Références

Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 May 01;11(5):642-650
pubmed: 33131224
CMAJ. 2021 Oct 12;193(40):E1573-E1574
pubmed: 35040803
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2020 Jun;36(3):187-190
pubmed: 32398176
Oncologist. 2020 Jan;25(1):e130-e137
pubmed: 31506392
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;4(6):849-856
pubmed: 29494733
Ann Oncol. 2022 Feb 14;:
pubmed: 35176459
Cancer J. 2009 Sep-Oct;15(5):401-5
pubmed: 19826360
BMJ. 2020 Nov 4;371:m4087
pubmed: 33148535
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011 Oct 18;9(1):41-7
pubmed: 22009075
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;37(4):336-349
pubmed: 30707056
Ann Oncol. 2016 Mar;27(3):373-8
pubmed: 26578738
Health Policy. 2019 Feb;123(2):182-190
pubmed: 28420539
Ann Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;28(10):2340-2366
pubmed: 28945867
Value Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;17(1):98-108
pubmed: 24438723
Health Policy. 2019 Mar;123(3):267-274
pubmed: 30316540

Auteurs

Sandeep Sehdev (S)

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre and The University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.

Alexandra Chambers (A)

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Inc. Canada, Dorval, ON H9S 1A9, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH