Screening for Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy: Is There a Need?

cardiomyopathy cardiovascular disease maternal mortality pregnancy

Journal

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease
ISSN: 2308-3425
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101651414

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Mar 2022
Historique:
received: 20 02 2022
revised: 12 03 2022
accepted: 15 03 2022
entrez: 24 3 2022
pubmed: 25 3 2022
medline: 25 3 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Maternal mortality in the United States has been on the rise. Every year, about 700 women die from pregnancy-related complications. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for a large majority of pregnancy-related deaths driven by the lack of recognition and delays in diagnosis due to the overlap of normal pregnancy symptoms with those of CVD. Risk factors for CVD including race, advanced maternal age, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, socioeconomic status, and geographic region play an important role in CVD-related deaths. Several risk assessment models are available to stratify women with a known diagnosis of CVD. However, most women who die from CVD during pregnancy or the postpartum period do not have a prior diagnosis of CVD, and cardiomyopathy is an important contributor. The California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative (CMQCC) developed an algorithm to screen all pregnant and postpartum women to allow stratification into low or high risk for CVD. The algorithm has been validated in diverse patient populations. We propose universal CVD screening for all women in the antepartum and postpartum period to identify women at risk and to provide education and awareness for both patients and healthcare providers. This screening tool would work to reduce the increasing rates of severe maternal mortality and morbidity while having a significant impact on healthcare costs in the United States.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35323636
pii: jcdd9030089
doi: 10.3390/jcdd9030089
pmc: PMC8953180
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Références

Obstet Gynecol. 2017 May;129(5):819-826
pubmed: 28383382
Eur Heart J. 2010 Sep;31(17):2124-32
pubmed: 20584777
AJP Rep. 2020 Oct;10(4):e362-e368
pubmed: 33214931
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 29;71(21):2419-2430
pubmed: 29793631
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1029-36
pubmed: 23090519
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 6;19(1):1234
pubmed: 31492118
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Mar 31;75(12):1443-1452
pubmed: 32216913
Circulation. 2022 Feb 15;145(7):549-551
pubmed: 35157521
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 7;39(34):3165-3241
pubmed: 30165544
Circulation. 2020 Jun 9;141(23):e884-e903
pubmed: 32362133
Hypertension. 2020 Jan;75(1):33-34
pubmed: 31707839
Circulation. 2022 Feb 15;145(7):502-504
pubmed: 35157515
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;213(3):379.e1-10
pubmed: 25979616
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 29;55(10):
pubmed: 31569595
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;63(4):808-814
pubmed: 33060374

Auteurs

Melissa E Chambers (ME)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA.

Madushka Y De Zoysa (MY)

Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA.

Afshan B Hameed (AB)

Department of Maternal Fetal Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, USA.

Classifications MeSH