Developing welfare parameters for African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in fenced reserves in South Africa.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
03
05
2021
accepted:
21
02
2022
entrez:
24
3
2022
pubmed:
25
3
2022
medline:
28
4
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
South Africa has many fenced reserves harbouring small to medium sized populations of African elephant (Loxodonta africana), most of which have been translocated. Elephants on fenced reserves may be exposed to various management interventions and practices (translocation, hunting, darting, high tourism impact, contraception programs, disruption due to infrastructure maintenance, etc.). These factors may impact the welfare of elephants. Poor elephant welfare may have serious consequences such as increased inter- and intra-species aggression that could result in fatalities. This is the first study to attempt to define behavioural and physiological welfare parameters for free-ranging elephants on small to medium sized reserves. The eight study sites incorporated reserves with different social structure combinations, elephant life-histories, reserve sizes, habitat, management, and tourism intensity. Data collection consisted of behavioural observations (10-minute videos) as well as faecal samples. By incorporating both behavioural and physiological (faecal glucocorticoid metabolite (fGCM) concentration) parameters, we aimed to investigate whether the two parameters showed similar trends. Five behavioural categories were identified (Arousal, Assessing, Ambivalent, Ambivalent/ Body care, and Frustrated behaviour), with various detailed behaviours demonstrated by the elephants that may indicate the influence of anthropogenic disturbance and possibly impact on animal welfare. The study showed significant differences between the selected detailed behaviours, behavioural categories and fGCM concentrations of elephants across the eight reserves. History seemed to be a decisive factor, as reserves with predominantly ex-captive elephants showed higher frequencies of certain behaviours as well as higher fGCM concentrations. Age, sex, reserve size and season were also found to contribute to our defined welfare indices and fGCM concentrations. This indicates that behavioural parameters, indicative of certain behavioural states, are valuable indicators of welfare, as supported by the physiological response of the elephants. The results also highlight the importance of taking multiple specified behaviours from a category into consideration when evaluating the welfare of elephants, to account for individual variation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35324916
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264931
pii: PONE-D-21-13919
pmc: PMC8947097
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0264931Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following competing interests: TR and TE are employees of the Elephant Reintegration Trust. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
Physiol Behav. 2019 Feb 1;199:229-243
pubmed: 30468744
Animals (Basel). 2019 Aug 14;9(8):
pubmed: 31416158
Physiol Behav. 2007 Oct 22;92(3):375-97
pubmed: 17428510
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 6;14(2):e0210783
pubmed: 30726232
Anim Reprod Sci. 1998 Oct;53(1-4):19-34
pubmed: 9835364
Front Zool. 2013 Oct 23;10(1):62
pubmed: 24152378
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2018 Sep 15;266:150-156
pubmed: 29777687
Curr Biol. 2021 Jun 7;31(11):2437-2445.e4
pubmed: 33798431
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Sep;34(5):502-8
pubmed: 24697967
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Mar;24(3):127-35
pubmed: 19185386
Zoo Biol. 2010 Mar-Apr;29(2):237-55
pubmed: 19514018
Science. 2001 Apr 20;292(5516):491-4
pubmed: 11313492
Naturwissenschaften. 2005 Apr;92(4):158-63
pubmed: 15770465
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Oct 7;276(1672):3513-21
pubmed: 19605399
PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31818
pubmed: 22384079
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20619
pubmed: 21731620
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2016 Jan 15;226:50-5
pubmed: 26723188
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Apr 28;288(1949):20202718
pubmed: 33878919
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Apr;1224:191-206
pubmed: 21486301
Rev Sci Tech. 2005 Aug;24(2):515-28
pubmed: 16358505
Conserv Biol. 2019 Aug;33(4):803-811
pubmed: 30549308
Am J Primatol. 1989;18(1):1-13
pubmed: 31964045
Trends Ecol Evol. 2012 Dec;27(12):679-88
pubmed: 23040461
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 May;19(5):249-55
pubmed: 16701264
Behav Brain Res. 2010 Jul 29;211(1):96-104
pubmed: 20230861
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999 Jul;115(1):76-89
pubmed: 10375466
Vet Res Commun. 2002 Feb;26(2):127-39
pubmed: 11922482
Conserv Biol. 2008 Dec;22(6):1590-9
pubmed: 18759771
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Dec;1(3):191-8
pubmed: 11257907
J Evol Biol. 2017 Sep;30(9):1612-1632
pubmed: 28597938
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999 Nov;23(7):925-35
pubmed: 10580307
Animals (Basel). 2017 Aug 09;7(8):
pubmed: 28792485
J Comp Psychol. 2008 Feb;122(1):62-7
pubmed: 18298282
Vet Rec. 2016 Oct 22;179(16):412-413
pubmed: 27770094
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003 Nov;134(2):156-66
pubmed: 14511986
Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2019 Apr;213:1-13
pubmed: 32287573
Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):185-193
pubmed: 10413556
Conserv Physiol. 2017 Dec 18;5(1):cox067
pubmed: 29270294
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 14;11(7):e0144276
pubmed: 27416071
Anim Behav. 2012 Apr;83-330(4):1067-1074
pubmed: 22536004
Behav Processes. 1991 Dec;25(2-3):103-15
pubmed: 24923970