Field evaluation of the enhanced MM3-COPRO ELISA test for the diagnosis of Fasciola hepatica infection in sheep.


Journal

PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2022
Historique:
received: 19 10 2021
accepted: 03 03 2022
entrez: 24 3 2022
pubmed: 25 3 2022
medline: 6 5 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Fasciolosis is a severe zoonosis responsible for major economic losses in livestock. The enhanced MM3-COPRO test (eMM3-COPRO) and the commercial version BIO K 201 (Bio-X Diagnostics, Rochefort, Belgium) are widely used as immunodiagnostic tools for the specific detection of coproantigens released by Fasciola during the late prepatent and patent stages of infection. However, performance of the eMM3-COPRO has never been evaluated under field conditions. To address this gap, a large number of ovine faecal samples, collected in a region where fasciolosis is endemic (Galicia, NW Spain), were analyzed. Two groups of sheep flocks were selected according to the Fasciola infection status: 'Fasciola-free' and 'Fasciola-infected' flocks. 'Fasciola-free' flocks were seronegative flocks with no history of fasciolosis detected by either coproscopy or necropsy in the last 5 years. Faecal samples from these sheep were used to calculate a cut-off value for infection (OD = 0.021). The cut-off was calculated using a bootstrap resampling method that enables estimation of the sampling distribution of the statistical parameters without making assumptions about the underlying data distribution. 'Fasciola-infected' flocks were characterized by high seroprevalence, a history of fasciolosis and periodical treatment with flukicides. Samples from these flocks were used to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of the eMM3-COPRO relative to coproscopy, which although limited by poor sensitivity is the only reference test available for diagnosing fasciolosis in vivo. To overcome this limitation, all animals classified positive by eMM3-COPRO were treated with triclabendazole and then retested. The eMM3-COPRO displayed higher sensitivity than coproscopy, as it detected coproantigens in all samples with positive coproscopy and in 12% of samples with negative coproscopy. The test also proved highly specific as coproantigens disappeared after the treatment. The eMM3-COPRO was less time consuming than coproscopy, particularly when the procedure involved numerous samples, and showed promise as a tool for monitoring flukicide efficacy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35324959
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265569
pii: PONE-D-21-33455
pmc: PMC8947386
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e0265569

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Références

Vet Parasitol. 2008 May 6;153(1-2):44-51
pubmed: 18329811
Vet Parasitol. 2008 Nov 7;157(3-4):235-43
pubmed: 18774648
Parasitol Res. 2016 Jul;115(7):2581-7
pubmed: 26997342
Vet Parasitol. 2015 Sep 15;212(3-4):181-7
pubmed: 26234898
Vet Parasitol. 2016 Dec 15;232:8-11
pubmed: 27890084
Clin Biochem. 2019 Sep;71:14-16
pubmed: 31199902
Vet Parasitol. 2010 Feb 26;168(1-2):36-44
pubmed: 19897308
Parasitol Int. 2010 Dec;59(4):610-5
pubmed: 20833265
Vet Parasitol. 2012 Aug 13;188(1-2):194-9
pubmed: 22503038
Trends Parasitol. 2021 May;37(5):430-444
pubmed: 33461901
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 26;11(8):e0161621
pubmed: 27564546
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 06;11(9):e0162420
pubmed: 27598003
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 4;7(1):7319
pubmed: 28779120
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2013 Dec 11;4(1):48-54
pubmed: 24596668
Int J Parasitol. 2006 Sep;36(10-11):1153-8
pubmed: 16843470
Microorganisms. 2021 Aug 10;9(8):
pubmed: 34442776
Parasitol Res. 2011 Sep;109(3):953-7
pubmed: 21472403
Vet Clin Pathol. 2012 Dec;41(4):441-53
pubmed: 23240820
Clin Chem. 2005 Nov;51(11):2198-200
pubmed: 16244304
Parasit Vectors. 2011 Sep 15;4:176
pubmed: 21917183
Vet Parasitol. 2009 Jan 22;159(1):77-81
pubmed: 19019548
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2019 Jan;34(1):89-94
pubmed: 30728678
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011 Nov;5(11):e1376
pubmed: 22087343
Aust Vet J. 1969 Jul;45(7):326-8
pubmed: 5817298
Vet Parasitol. 2012 Nov 23;190(1-2):272-6
pubmed: 22818198
Vet Parasitol. 2015 Jan 15;207(1-2):34-43
pubmed: 25529143
J Parasitol. 2009 Apr;95(2):450-5
pubmed: 18763850
Vet Parasitol. 2018 Feb 15;251:85-89
pubmed: 29426482
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Sep 15;11(9):e0005931
pubmed: 28915255
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Jul 1;195(1-2):65-71
pubmed: 23411375
Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2020 Apr;12:39-59
pubmed: 32179499
Theriogenology. 1998 Sep;50(4):587-93
pubmed: 10732149
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Mar 10;176(2-3):170-6
pubmed: 21112153
Vet Parasitol. 2002 May 10;105(4):337-43
pubmed: 11983308
Vet Parasitol. 2021 Jun;294:109435
pubmed: 33946031
Clin Chim Acta. 2003 Aug;334(1-2):5-23
pubmed: 12867273
Vet Parasitol. 2020 Jan;277:109019
pubmed: 31918044
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Oct 18;197(1-2):277-82
pubmed: 23743420
Vet Rec. 2012 Nov 17;171(20):502
pubmed: 23077134
J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2020 Jun;73(6):392-409
pubmed: 32132676
Vet Rec. 2019 Apr 20;184(16):502
pubmed: 30824600
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010 Dec;8(12 Suppl):S2-6
pubmed: 21548182
J Parasitol. 2007 Feb;93(1):65-72
pubmed: 17436943
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Aug 25;180(3-4):237-42
pubmed: 21459514
Aust Vet J. 2014 Sep;92(9):357-61
pubmed: 25156056
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988 May 21;296(6634):1454-6
pubmed: 3132290
Int J Parasitol. 2021 Oct;51(11):913-924
pubmed: 33901437
Stat Med. 2000 May 15;19(9):1141-64
pubmed: 10797513
Vet Parasitol. 1992 Sep;44(1-2):35-44
pubmed: 1441190
Vet Parasitol. 2021 Oct;298:109504
pubmed: 34271316
Vet Parasitol. 2011 Feb 28;176(1):34-42
pubmed: 21093156
J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Jan;32(1):190-3
pubmed: 8126178
Vet Parasitol. 2020 Jan;277:109016
pubmed: 31901738
Vet Parasitol. 2012 Nov 23;190(1-2):80-6
pubmed: 22749330
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 Jul 20;10(7):e0004872
pubmed: 27438470
Vet Parasitol. 2015 Apr 15;209(1-2):117-24
pubmed: 25771931
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009 Jul;81(1):156-62
pubmed: 19556582
Ann Clin Biochem. 1991 May;28 ( Pt 3):207-11
pubmed: 1872563
Vet Parasitol. 2013 Sep 23;196(3-4):417-26
pubmed: 23643623
Vet Parasitol. 2017 Nov 15;246:60-69
pubmed: 28969782
J Parasitol. 2004 Aug;90(4):845-52
pubmed: 15357080
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 May;17(5):630-6
pubmed: 22413850
Am J Vet Res. 1998 May;59(5):533-7
pubmed: 9582951
Vet Parasitol. 2012 Jul 6;187(3-4):436-44
pubmed: 22421492
Front Neurol. 2015 Aug 19;6:179
pubmed: 26347708

Auteurs

Mercedes Mezo (M)

Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo, AGACAL, Abegondo, A Coruña, España.

Marta González-Warleta (M)

Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo, AGACAL, Abegondo, A Coruña, España.

José Antonio Castro-Hermida (JA)

Laboratorio de Parasitología, Centro de Investigaciones Agrarias de Mabegondo, AGACAL, Abegondo, A Coruña, España.

Victoria Martínez-Sernández (V)

Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España.

Florencio M Ubeira (FM)

Laboratorio de Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH