Corneal and corneal epithelial thickness distribution characteristics in healthy North Indian eyes using spectral domain optical coherence tomography.


Journal

Indian journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1998-3689
Titre abrégé: Indian J Ophthalmol
Pays: India
ID NLM: 0405376

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Historique:
entrez: 25 3 2022
pubmed: 26 3 2022
medline: 14 4 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To determine the pattern of corneal thickness and epithelial thickness distribution in healthy North Indian eyes by using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). The observational study measured total corneal and epithelial thickness in the central 2 mm zone and eight sectors each in paracentral 2-5 mm (ring 1) and midperipheral 5-7 mm (ring 2) zones on SD-OCT. The study included 67 eyes of 67 subjects with a male:female ratio of 32:35 and mean age of 25.04 ± 4.54 years. The mean central corneal and epithelial thicknesses were 505.97 ± 30.12 μm and 60.48 ± 8.37 μm, respectively. The epithelium of inferior and infero-nasal sectors in ring 1 and inferior sector in ring 2 was significantly thicker than the radially opposite sectors of the respective rings (P = 0.001; P = 0.01 and P = 0.02, respectively). Sector-wise analysis did not reveal any significant correlation between the total corneal thickness and epithelial thickness (all P > 0.05) except in the outer superior sector where there was a weak positive correlation (r = 0.28, P = 0.02). Central epithelial thickness in males (60.59 ± 9.28 μm) and females (60.37 ± 7.58 μm) was comparable (P = 0.91). Pachymetry was thinnest in the inferior, inferonasal, and inferotemporal sectors in 44.79% of eyes (n = 30), while thinnest epithelium was seen in the superior, superonasal, and superotemporal quadrants in 50.75% of eyes (n = 34). The epithelial thickness distribution in this sample of topographically normal healthy North Indian eyes was nonuniform and independent of the underlying corneal thickness. Epithelium was thinner in the superior cornea, whereas total corneal thickness was minimum in the inferior part.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35326008
pii: IndianJOphthalmol_2022_70_4_1171_340180
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_2259_21
pmc: PMC9240488
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1171-1178

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

None

Références

Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 May 04;53(6):2580-5
pubmed: 22427573
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 Mar;39(3):487-501
pubmed: 9501858
J Refract Surg. 2009 Jul;25(7):604-10
pubmed: 19662917
Cornea. 2003 May;22(4):304-7
pubmed: 12792471
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Mar 1;59(3):1652-1658
pubmed: 29625491
J Ophthalmol. 2015;2015:860313
pubmed: 26060579
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Jan;44(1):10-5
pubmed: 12506049
Eye Contact Lens. 2004 Oct;30(4):189-93; discussion 205-6
pubmed: 15499246
Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;83(6):360-5
pubmed: 16772894
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Sep;30(9):1851-60
pubmed: 15342046
J Refract Surg. 2010 Apr;26(4):259-71
pubmed: 20415322
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 01;8(8):e66158
pubmed: 23936291
Ophthalmology. 2012 Dec;119(12):2425-33
pubmed: 22917888
Ophthalmic Res. 2019;62(3):134-140
pubmed: 31266046
Surv Ophthalmol. 2020 Mar - Apr;65(2):187-204
pubmed: 31560871
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 May;82(5):416-9
pubmed: 15894917
Refract Corneal Surg. 1993 Jan-Feb;9(1):42-50
pubmed: 8481372
Cornea. 2012 Sep;31(9):1036-43
pubmed: 22357393
J Refract Surg. 2013 Mar;29(3):173-9
pubmed: 23446013
J Refract Surg. 2008 Jun;24(6):571-81
pubmed: 18581782
Am J Ophthalmol. 1980 Apr;89(4):507-16
pubmed: 7369314
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 25;15(11):e0239124
pubmed: 33237913
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jun;45(6):1812-6
pubmed: 15161844
Cornea. 2013 Nov;32(11):1493-8
pubmed: 24042485
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Dec;68(12):2819-2830
pubmed: 33229657
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017 Jan;43(1):60-66
pubmed: 28317679
J Ophthalmol. 2017;2017:1018321
pubmed: 28607770
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;69(9):2425-2429
pubmed: 34427236
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Feb;42(2):284-95
pubmed: 27026454
J Refract Surg. 2015 Jul;31(7):438-45
pubmed: 26186562

Auteurs

Chintan Malhotra (C)

Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Barkha Gupta (B)

Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Rajneesh Dhiman (R)

Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Arun K Jain (AK)

Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Amit Gupta (A)

Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Jagat Ram (J)

Advanced Eye Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH